Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 50 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

Social foragers rely more on dynamic cues than prior beliefs in unpredictable natural environments

  1. 1Max Planck Institute for Human Development

Abstract

Foraging is a prime example of adaptive decision-making in uncertain and changing environments. Foragers need to continuously integrate their direct experiences and observations of what others are doing with what they already know about the distribution of prey. Yet little is known about the importance of prior knowledge relative to dynamically sampled information in social foraging settings. Here, we investigated the role of prior beliefs in five large-scale ice-fishing competitions involving 49--53 highly experienced ice-fishers in 251 foraging trips. To quantify their prior spatial beliefs, participants marked areas they believed to have high resource abundance on topographic maps containing isoclines (i.e., depth curves) before each competition. GPS devices and headcams tracked behavioural states and foraging success. We found that prior beliefs about the fish distribution are to a large extent driven by lake topography and therefore converge across individuals. However, these prior beliefs were not systematically linked to foraging success. While prior beliefs predicted spot choices, especially in the beginning of competitions, they were heavily outweighed by dynamic personal and social information sources. Exploring how the use of prior beliefs differed between foraging trips, we found that high reliance on prior beliefs was associated with reduced avoidance of unsuccessful locations which resulted in limited spatial exploration. We conclude that dynamic information sampling and accumulation are key processes in social foraging decisions, with prior spatial beliefs playing only a minor role in natural environments where resources are hard to predict in advance.

Related

  1. Thiamine availability and uptake in lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) eggs and embryos: contrasting natural and artificial environments
    Matthew H. Futia, Colin Clark, Christopher P. Suffridge +3
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEcologyCrossref
  2. An integrated instance segmentation and deep feature fusion model for robust leaf species classification in natural environments
    K. Arunkumar, S. Leninisha
    Frontiers in Plant SciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPlant biologyCrossrefEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
  3. Tracking human foragers and their prey reveals adaptive predator-prey dynamics
    F. Dhellemmes, A. Schakowski, V. Chirkov +7
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textZoology & animal behaviourbioRxiv
  4. Credible Signaling through Sound – the Role of Timbre in Music Recognition in Young BaYaka Foragers
    Matthias M. C. van der Vlist, Jiaxin Li, Frans T. M. van Schaik +3
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textEvolutionary biologyOSF
  5. How natural dynamic pH conditions could affect compounds mediating marine diatom-bacteria interactions: a chemical theoretical perspective
    Christina C. Roggatz
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyCrossrefDOAJ
BibTeX
@misc{schakowski2026social,
  title = {{Social foragers rely more on dynamic cues than prior beliefs in unpredictable natural environments}},
  author = {A. Schakowski and D. Deffner and R. Kortet and P. T. Niemela and M. M. Kavelaars and M. Pykala and R. H. J. M. Kurvers},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.30.763071},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.30.763071v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Social foragers rely more on dynamic cues than prior beliefs in unpredictable natural environments
AU  - A. Schakowski
AU  - D. Deffner
AU  - R. Kortet
AU  - P. T. Niemela
AU  - M. M. Kavelaars
AU  - M. Pykala
AU  - R. H. J. M. Kurvers
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.30.763071
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.30.763071v1
AB  - Foraging is a prime example of adaptive decision-making in uncertain and changing environments. Foragers need to continuously integrate their direct experiences and observations of what others are doing with what they already know about the distribution of prey. Yet little is known about the importance of prior knowledge relative to dynamically sampled information in social foraging settings. Here, we investigated the role of prior beliefs in five large-scale ice-fishing competitions involving 49--53 highly experienced ice-fishers in 251 foraging trips. To quantify their prior spatial beliefs, participants marked areas they believed to have high resource abundance on topographic maps containing isoclines (i.e., depth curves) before each competition. GPS devices and headcams tracked behavioural states and foraging success. We found that prior beliefs about the fish distribution are to a large extent driven by lake topography and therefore converge across individuals. However, these prior beliefs were not systematically linked to foraging success. While prior beliefs predicted spot choices, especially in the beginning of competitions, they were heavily outweighed by dynamic personal and social information sources. Exploring how the use of prior beliefs differed between foraging trips, we found that high reliance on prior beliefs was associated with reduced avoidance of unsuccessful locations which resulted in limited spatial exploration. We conclude that dynamic information sampling and accumulation are key processes in social foraging decisions, with prior spatial beliefs playing only a minor role in natural environments where resources are hard to predict in advance.
ER  -