Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Pure dephasing destroys two-photon amplitude, not nonlinear phase

Abstract

A two-level emitter chirally coupled to a waveguide imprints a π conditional phase on a two-photon pulse, a key component assumed in quantum photonic neural network architectures, but whether it survives the pure dephasing of a solid-state emitter is unknown, since no two-photon scattering treatment includes it. We derive the dephased two-photon amplitude in closed form and validate it against an independent Fock-state master equation. The conditional phase is pinned at exactly π at every dephasing rate examined: dephasing destroys the amplitude carrying the nonlinear phase rather than rotating it. The one- and two-photon channels are not attenuated equally, so dephasing does not simply scale the node down but reweights it between photon-number sectors---an error no phase setting can train away. The standard factorization of two-photon correlators, exact for arbitrary loss, fails at first order in γϕ, discarding $16−−81\%$ of pairs over γϕ/γ=0.1--$1$.

Related

  1. Horizon, Null-Orbit, and Photon-Sphere Phase Structures in Logarithmic Nonlinear Electrodynamics
    Peshwaz Abdulkareem Abdoul
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGravitation & general relativityHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  2. Boson Sampling Using Fock States from On-Demand Single Photon Source Arrays: Quantum Complexity & Impact of Dephasing
    Swarnabha Chattaraj, Anupam Madhukar
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptics & photonicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Dynamically suppressing cavity dephasing induced by frequency fluctuations of a coupled nonlinear mode
    Yunwei Lu, Xinyuan You, Ziwen Huang +3
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Optimal phase estimation in the presence of correlated dephasing
    Srijon Ghosh, Arkadiusz Kobus, Stanisław Kurdziałek +1
    QuantumPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Quantum physics & quantum informationQuantumCrossref
  5. Dephasing-Enhanced Response and Phase Transitions in Quantum Boltzmann Samplers
    Yu-Xuan Zhang, Jing-Ling Chen, Leong-Chuan Kwek +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{kozma2026pure,
  title = {{Pure dephasing destroys two-photon amplitude, not nonlinear phase}},
  author = {Matthew Kozma and Stephen Hughes},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.30098},
  eprint = {2610.30098},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30098},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Pure dephasing destroys two-photon amplitude, not nonlinear phase
AU  - Matthew Kozma
AU  - Stephen Hughes
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/21
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.30098
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30098
AB  - A two-level emitter chirally coupled to a waveguide imprints a π conditional phase on a two-photon pulse, a key component assumed in quantum photonic neural network architectures, but whether it survives the pure dephasing of a solid-state emitter is unknown, since no two-photon scattering treatment includes it. We derive the dephased two-photon amplitude in closed form and validate it against an independent Fock-state master equation. The conditional phase is pinned at exactly π at every dephasing rate examined: dephasing destroys the amplitude carrying the nonlinear phase rather than rotating it. The one- and two-photon channels are not attenuated equally, so dephasing does not simply scale the node down but reweights it between photon-number sectors---an error no phase setting can train away. The standard factorization of two-photon correlators, exact for arbitrary loss, fails at first order in γ_ϕ, discarding $16−−81\%$ of pairs over γ_ϕ/γ=0.1--$1$.
ER  -