Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways versus conventional perioperative care for colorectal resection.
10 affiliations
- 1Department of Colorectal Surgery, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea, South.
- 2Institute of Evidence Based Medicine, Institute of Convergence Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea, South.
- 3Department of Urology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea, South.
- 4Department of Precision Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea, South.
- 5Institute of Evidence Based Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea, South.
- 6Department of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Wonju, Korea, South.
- 7Department of Acute Care Surgery, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea, South.
- 8Department of Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea, South.
- 9Yonsei Wonju Medical Library, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea, South.
- 10Health Check-up Center, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea, South.
Abstract
Objectives
This is a protocol for a Cochrane review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the effects of ERAS pathways compared with conventional perioperative care in people undergoing colorectal resection for malignant or benign conditions.
Related
- Perioperative inflammation in gynecologic oncology: nursing strategies for enhanced recovery and complication prevention
- Cold snare polypectomy versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal polyps 15 mm or smaller: delayed bleeding and resection outcomes in a retrospective cohort.
- IMpact of PerioperAtive KeTamine on Enhanced Recovery After abdominal Surgery (IMPAKT ERAS). Comment on Br J Anaesth 2025; 135: 1770–8
- Perioperative parameters to consider for enhanced recovery in surgery (ERS) in gynecology (excluding breast surgery)
- Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Cardiac Surgery: From Evidence to Precision Perioperative Medicine
BibTeX
@article{an2026enhanced,
title = {{Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways versus conventional perioperative care for colorectal resection.}},
author = {Sanghyun An and Jae Hung Jung and Insik Shin and Won Yeol Kim and Woo Seong Won and Myung Ha Kim and Kwangmin Kim and supported by Cochrane Colorectal Review Group},
journal = {The Cochrane database of systematic reviews},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1002/14651858.cd016406},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42905959},
note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways versus conventional perioperative care for colorectal resection.
AU - Sanghyun An
AU - Jae Hung Jung
AU - Insik Shin
AU - Won Yeol Kim
AU - Woo Seong Won
AU - Myung Ha Kim
AU - Kwangmin Kim
AU - supported by Cochrane Colorectal Review Group
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/21
JO - The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
DO - 10.1002/14651858.cd016406
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42905959
AB - Objectives This is a protocol for a Cochrane review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the effects of ERAS pathways compared with conventional perioperative care in people undergoing colorectal resection for malignant or benign conditions.
SN - 1469-493X
ER -