Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,578 studies31 sourcesUpdated 10 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDPrecision chemistry

Structural Empowerment Sensing: Decoding the Structure-Activity Relationship and Detection Application of G‑Quadruplex Aptamer.

4 affiliations
  1. 1College of Chemistry and Enviromental Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University, 81 Zhaowudalu, Hohhot 010022, China.
  2. 2School of Mining and Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, Hulunbuir University, Hulunbuir 021008, China.
  3. 3College of Pharmacy, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Jinchuankaifaqu, Hohhot 010110, China.
  4. 4Key Laboratory of Metabolic Disease Regulation and Biomedical Therapy of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Inner Mongolia Academy of Medical Sciences, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot 010010, China.

Abstract

G-Quadruplex (G4) aptamers have emerged as versatile functional nucleic acid architectures for biosensing because of their unique conformational plasticity, programmable topologies, and intrinsic signal-regulation capabilities. Unlike conventional recognition elements that mainly function as passive binding scaffolds, G4 aptamers can actively regulate signal generation and transduction through topology-dependent structural dynamics. Increasing evidence indicates that biosensing performance is closely governed by conformational energetics, folding kinetics, loop organization, ion coordination, and nano-interfacial coupling. This review summarizes recent advances in structure-guided G4 aptamer biosensing from the perspective of "structural empowerment", where conformational architectures directly determine sensing behavior and analytical output. We first discuss the structural fundamentals of G4 aptamers, including topology diversity, thermodynamic stability, folding pathways, and environmental responsiveness, emphasizing their influence on molecular recognition and signal accessibility. We then analyze the mechanistic relationship between G4 conformational transitions and multiple signal transduction modes, including fluorescence, electrochemical, colorimetric, surface-enhanced Raman scattering, photoelectrochemical, and catalytic sensing systems. Particular attention is given to the integration of G4 architectures with CRISPR platforms, nanozymes, DNA amplification circuits, metal-organic frameworks, and nanointerfacial engineering strategies. Importantly, this review establishes a structure-performance framework correlating G4 topological features and kinetic behaviors with analytical outcomes. Current limitations, including structural polymorphism, ionic dependence, reproducibility issues, and limited quantitative predictability, are critically discussed. Finally, future opportunities in adaptive biosensing, intelligent molecular interfaces, and AI-assisted structural design are highlighted. This review establishes a quantitative structure-performance framework by correlating G4 structural descriptors, conformational energetics, kinetic parameters, and analytical outputs, providing a basis for predictive design of G4-based sensing systems.

Related

  1. The role of a G-quadruplex structure in mediating the interactions of miR-1249-3p with the 3-UTR of the HNRNPK mRNA
    M. Kasaju, R. M. Palumbo, C. Gray +4
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationbioRxiv
  2. Introduction of a Double‐Headed Nucleotide Into G‐Quadruplex DNA: Position‐Dependent Stabilization and Structural Insights
    Krista Urup, Peter Reinholdt, Kasper Munch Beck +3
    Chemistry (Weinheim an Der Bergstrasse, Germany)Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationPMC
  3. A Structure–Activity Relationship Study of Trypargine and Opacaline β-Carbolines
    Dan Chen, Florent Rouvier, Jean Michel Brunel +2
    Marine drugsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text1 citedMolecular biology & gene regulationHAL
  4. Large-scale structural analysis of pre-mRNA structure using RADIS
    C. Fleurisson, S. Chen, R. M. Macdonald +8
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationbioRxiv
  5. Chapter 14: Unwinding Quadruplex Structures with RNA Helicases
    John C. Marecki, Jun Gao, Kevin D. Raney
    Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)Peer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationPMC
BibTeX
@article{bao2026structural,
  title = {{Structural Empowerment Sensing: Decoding the Structure-Activity Relationship and Detection Application of G‑Quadruplex Aptamer.}},
  author = {Wenji Bao and Ailing Su and Denggerile Ao and Lu Ga and Lan Yu and Jun Ai},
  journal = {Precision chemistry},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1021/prechem.6c00083},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42953285},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Structural Empowerment Sensing: Decoding the Structure-Activity Relationship and Detection Application of G‑Quadruplex Aptamer.
AU  - Wenji Bao
AU  - Ailing Su
AU  - Denggerile Ao
AU  - Lu Ga
AU  - Lan Yu
AU  - Jun Ai
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/28
JO  - Precision chemistry
DO  - 10.1021/prechem.6c00083
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42953285
AB  - G-Quadruplex (G4) aptamers have emerged as versatile functional nucleic acid architectures for biosensing because of their unique conformational plasticity, programmable topologies, and intrinsic signal-regulation capabilities. Unlike conventional recognition elements that mainly function as passive binding scaffolds, G4 aptamers can actively regulate signal generation and transduction through topology-dependent structural dynamics. Increasing evidence indicates that biosensing performance is closely governed by conformational energetics, folding kinetics, loop organization, ion coordination, and nano-interfacial coupling. This review summarizes recent advances in structure-guided G4 aptamer biosensing from the perspective of "structural empowerment", where conformational architectures directly determine sensing behavior and analytical output. We first discuss the structural fundamentals of G4 aptamers, including topology diversity, thermodynamic stability, folding pathways, and environmental responsiveness, emphasizing their influence on molecular recognition and signal accessibility. We then analyze the mechanistic relationship between G4 conformational transitions and multiple signal transduction modes, including fluorescence, electrochemical, colorimetric, surface-enhanced Raman scattering, photoelectrochemical, and catalytic sensing systems. Particular attention is given to the integration of G4 architectures with CRISPR platforms, nanozymes, DNA amplification circuits, metal-organic frameworks, and nanointerfacial engineering strategies. Importantly, this review establishes a structure-performance framework correlating G4 topological features and kinetic behaviors with analytical outcomes. Current limitations, including structural polymorphism, ionic dependence, reproducibility issues, and limited quantitative predictability, are critically discussed. Finally, future opportunities in adaptive biosensing, intelligent molecular interfaces, and AI-assisted structural design are highlighted. This review establishes a quantitative structure-performance framework by correlating G4 structural descriptors, conformational energetics, kinetic parameters, and analytical outputs, providing a basis for predictive design of G4-based sensing systems.
SN  - 2771-9316
ER  -