Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,335 studies31 sourcesUpdated 29 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Semi-Analytic Predictions for Strong-Lensing Perturbers in Cold and Self-Interacting Dark Matter

Abstract

Strong gravitational lensing is sensitive to the abundance and internal structure of dark matter halos, providing a probe of gravothermal evolution in self-interacting dark matter (SIDM). We combine semi-analytic cold dark matter (CDM) subhalo histories with a model for gravothermal evolution in SIDM to generate CDM and SIDM subhalo populations across SIDM parameter space. We predict their projected enclosed masses and deflection-based projected density slopes and compare them with three perturbers inferred through gravitational imaging in PJ011646, SDSS J0946+1006, and JVAS B1938+666. For SIDM model parameters σ0/mχ=147.1 cm2/g and w=120 km/s, SIDM subhalos reproduce all three perturbers more often than CDM subhalos. For PJ011646, we find ~0.6 cored SIDM subhalos per host matching the perturber, compared with ~0.002 in CDM, while core-collapsed subhalos are too steep. For SDSS J0946+1006, we find ~3 core-collapsed and ~0.004 cored SIDM subhalos per host, compared with none in 900 CDM realizations, although baryons, neglected here, may matter for such massive subhalos. For "detection V" in JVAS B1938+666, we find ~220 core-collapsed and ~20 cored SIDM subhalos per host within the 2σ posterior region, compared with ~0.2 in CDM; the CDM candidates require exceptionally early accretion, at median redshift z∼13. Simultaneously reproducing all three perturbers requires w≳102 km/s, so that the massive (~5.6×1010M⊙) progenitors of SDSS J0946+1006 candidates can collapse, and is achieved for σ0/mχ≳102 cm2/g in the parameter sets studied. Our results show how semi-analytic models can quantify how often subhalos reproduce individual perturbers in different dark matter models, and our modular framework can be readily updated as models of tidal stripping and late-stage gravothermal evolution in SIDM improve. (abridged)

Related

  1. On what scales does strong lensing robustly constrain the mass profile of low-mass perturbers?
    M Tajalli, S Vegetti
    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGalaxiesCrossref
  2. Hints of self-interacting dark matter from strong gravitational lensing
    Daniel Gilman, Kalliopi Petraki, Thomas Pignard +3
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  3. Detection of cosmic strings by gravitational wave lensing. Predictions for Einstein Telescope
    Jakub Szyndler, Tomasz Bulik
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  4. Gravitational Lensing Predictions from Wave Simulations of Fuzzy Dark Matter
    Jiajun Zhou, Zhengxiang Li, Amruth Alfred +3
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCosmologyarXiv
  5. Predictions on the abundance of primordial black holes: results from the SMILE VLBI milli-lensing sample
    Xinyue Jiang, Shuo Cao, Marek Biesiada +4
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCosmologyarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{tekverk2026semianalytic,
  title = {{Semi-Analytic Predictions for Strong-Lensing Perturbers in Cold and Self-Interacting Dark Matter}},
  author = {Jonathan Tekverk and Duncan K. Adams and Simon Birrer and Rouven Essig and Daniel Gilman},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.31881},
  eprint = {2610.31881},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31881},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Semi-Analytic Predictions for Strong-Lensing Perturbers in Cold and Self-Interacting Dark Matter
AU  - Jonathan Tekverk
AU  - Duncan K. Adams
AU  - Simon Birrer
AU  - Rouven Essig
AU  - Daniel Gilman
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/22
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.31881
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31881
AB  - Strong gravitational lensing is sensitive to the abundance and internal structure of dark matter halos, providing a probe of gravothermal evolution in self-interacting dark matter (SIDM). We combine semi-analytic cold dark matter (CDM) subhalo histories with a model for gravothermal evolution in SIDM to generate CDM and SIDM subhalo populations across SIDM parameter space. We predict their projected enclosed masses and deflection-based projected density slopes and compare them with three perturbers inferred through gravitational imaging in PJ011646, SDSS J0946+1006, and JVAS B1938+666. For SIDM model parameters σ_0/m_χ=147.1 cm^2/g and w=120 km/s, SIDM subhalos reproduce all three perturbers more often than CDM subhalos. For PJ011646, we find ~0.6 cored SIDM subhalos per host matching the perturber, compared with ~0.002 in CDM, while core-collapsed subhalos are too steep. For SDSS J0946+1006, we find ~3 core-collapsed and ~0.004 cored SIDM subhalos per host, compared with none in 900 CDM realizations, although baryons, neglected here, may matter for such massive subhalos. For "detection V" in JVAS B1938+666, we find ~220 core-collapsed and ~20 cored SIDM subhalos per host within the 2σ posterior region, compared with ~0.2 in CDM; the CDM candidates require exceptionally early accretion, at median redshift z∼13. Simultaneously reproducing all three perturbers requires w≳10^2 km/s, so that the massive (~5.6×10^10M_⊙) progenitors of SDSS J0946+1006 candidates can collapse, and is achieved for σ_0/m_χ≳10^2 cm^2/g in the parameter sets studied. Our results show how semi-analytic models can quantify how often subhalos reproduce individual perturbers in different dark matter models, and our modular framework can be readily updated as models of tidal stripping and late-stage gravothermal evolution in SIDM improve. (abridged)
ER  -