Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 37 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of clinical medicine

Use of Tacrolimus and Voclosporin as Induction Therapy in Lupus Nephritis: A Focused Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Evidence

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Internal Medicine, Loyola Medicine MacNeal Hospital, Berwyn, IL 60402, USA
  2. 2Department of Internal Medicine, Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas, Beaumont, TX 77701, USA
  3. 3Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, El Paso, TX 79905, USA
  4. 4Department of Internal Medicine, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, IN 46845, USA

Abstract

Background: Lupus nephritis (LN) remains a major cause of morbidity among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, and treatment resistance continues to pose clinical challenges. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), including tacrolimus (TAC) and voclosporin (VCS), are used in induction regimens, but randomized evidence for the two agents arises from clinically different trial designs. This systematic review and meta-analysis separately quantifies randomized evidence for TAC-based and VCS-based induction regimens. Methods: Following PRISMA guidance, the literature search was updated to September 2026. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials enrolling adults with biopsy-proven active class III, IV, or V LN and were required to report complete and/or partial renal-response data in a form permitting extraction or calculation of an effect estimate. Study inclusion was not based on whether the treatment effect was favorable or statistically significant. Complete renal response was the prespecified primary outcome for quantitative synthesis. Separate random-effects meta-analyses were performed for TAC-based and VCS-based regimens. Because the two evidence sets did not share a sufficiently comparable common comparator, no formal TAC-versus-VCS Bucher comparison was retained. Results: Five randomized controlled trials were included in the quantitative synthesis: three TAC trials and two VCS trials. TAC-based regimens increased complete renal response relative to their respective comparators (RR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.00–1.86), although heterogeneity was substantial (I2 = 73%) and sensitivity analyses showed that the pooled result was influenced by the multitarget TAC + MMF trial. VCS added to MMF and low-dose glucocorticoids increased complete renal response versus the placebo with the same background therapy (RR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.35–2.34; I2 = 0%). Safety outcomes were summarized descriptively because definitions and reporting differed across trials. Conclusions: TAC-based and VCS-based induction regimens each showed benefits within their respective randomized trial settings. Differences in background therapy, comparators, study populations, and outcome definitions preclude a reliable indirect efficacy comparison between TAC and VCS. Head-to-head randomized trials using standardized background therapy and outcomes are needed.

Related

  1. High tacrolimus intrapatient variability is associated with graft loss after kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kittiphan Chienwichai, Pannawat Mongkolrattanakul, Arunchai Chang
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaCrossref
  2. Relevance‐Based Score for MIPD Model Selection: Systematic Review and External Evaluation of popPK Tacrolimus Models in Adult Transplant Recipients
    Samuel Baroudi, Bénédicte Franck, Jean-Baptiste Woillard +3
    CPT: Pharmacometrics and Systems PharmacologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsHAL
  3. Manual ventilation with and without a flow limiting device during induction of general anesthesia: a randomized crossover trial
    Mark F. Brady, Vendhan Ramanujam, Korinne Dankievitch +3
    Resuscitation plusPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Hemodynamic Induction of Intracranial Aneurysms via Bilateral Common Carotid Artery Ligation in Rabbits: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Laurentiu Andrei Blaj, Victor Ianole, Andrei Ionut Cucu +3
    Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. The Efficacy and Safety of Etrasimod for the Induction and Maintenance of Remission in Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
    Chaudhry Zaid Riaz, Muhammad Raza, Iman Afraz +8
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{zala2026tacrolimus,
  title = {{Use of Tacrolimus and Voclosporin as Induction Therapy in Lupus Nephritis: A Focused Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Evidence}},
  author = {Urvi Zala and Rushi Patel and Jacob Thompson and Anil Regmi},
  journal = {Journal of clinical medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.3390/jcm15197607},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13666491},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Use of Tacrolimus and Voclosporin as Induction Therapy in Lupus Nephritis: A Focused Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Evidence
AU  - Urvi Zala
AU  - Rushi Patel
AU  - Jacob Thompson
AU  - Anil Regmi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
JO  - Journal of clinical medicine
DO  - 10.3390/jcm15197607
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13666491
AB  - Background: Lupus nephritis (LN) remains a major cause of morbidity among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, and treatment resistance continues to pose clinical challenges. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), including tacrolimus (TAC) and voclosporin (VCS), are used in induction regimens, but randomized evidence for the two agents arises from clinically different trial designs. This systematic review and meta-analysis separately quantifies randomized evidence for TAC-based and VCS-based induction regimens. Methods: Following PRISMA guidance, the literature search was updated to September 2026. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials enrolling adults with biopsy-proven active class III, IV, or V LN and were required to report complete and/or partial renal-response data in a form permitting extraction or calculation of an effect estimate. Study inclusion was not based on whether the treatment effect was favorable or statistically significant. Complete renal response was the prespecified primary outcome for quantitative synthesis. Separate random-effects meta-analyses were performed for TAC-based and VCS-based regimens. Because the two evidence sets did not share a sufficiently comparable common comparator, no formal TAC-versus-VCS Bucher comparison was retained. Results: Five randomized controlled trials were included in the quantitative synthesis: three TAC trials and two VCS trials. TAC-based regimens increased complete renal response relative to their respective comparators (RR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.00–1.86), although heterogeneity was substantial (I2 = 73%) and sensitivity analyses showed that the pooled result was influenced by the multitarget TAC + MMF trial. VCS added to MMF and low-dose glucocorticoids increased complete renal response versus the placebo with the same background therapy (RR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.35–2.34; I2 = 0%). Safety outcomes were summarized descriptively because definitions and reporting differed across trials. Conclusions: TAC-based and VCS-based induction regimens each showed benefits within their respective randomized trial settings. Differences in background therapy, comparators, study populations, and outcome definitions preclude a reliable indirect efficacy comparison between TAC and VCS. Head-to-head randomized trials using standardized background therapy and outcomes are needed.
SN  - 2077-0383
ER  -