Barriers and facilitators to translating infection prevention knowledge into clinical practice at Bule Hora University Teaching Hospital, Ethiopia: mixed-methods study
- 1Institute of Health, Department of Environmental Health Science, Bule Hora University
- 2Institute of Health, Department of Medical Laboratory, Bule Hora University
- 3Department of Public Health, Institute of Health, Dambi Dollo University
Abstract
Healthcare-associated infections remain a significant global challenge, with systemic and behavioral barriers often impeding the translation of knowledge into practice. This study assessed the barriers and facilitators to applying infection prevention knowledge among frontline healthcare workers at Bule Hora University Teaching Hospital in Southern Ethiopia. A concurrent triangulation (convergent parallel) mixed-methods design was employed from August to September 2025. Quantitative data were collected from 186 randomly selected healthcare workers using stratified sampling with proportional allocation, while qualitative data were obtained from eight purposively selected key informants. The Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation (COM-B) behavioral framework guided this study. Quantitative data were processed using Epi Info version 4.6.1 and analyzed with SPSS version 26. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors of compliance, and qualitative data were analyzed using a hybrid deductive-inductive thematic analysis. Findings were integrated at the interpretation stage using a joint display, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Overall, 66.7% (95% CI: 59.9–73.5) of frontline staff had moderate knowledge, whereas only 57.53% (95% CI: 50.0–64.2) had good compliance with infection prevention and control (IPC) practices. Key physical opportunity gaps included the lack of ward-level handwashing facilities (55.4%), improper waste segregation at the point of generation (60.2%), and the absence of Hepatitis B vaccination (54.8%). In the multivariable logistic regression model, poor IPC compliance was significantly more likely among healthcare workers with a high workload (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 3.4; 95% CI: 1.4–8.4), those without ward-level handwashing facilities (AOR = 5.7; 95% CI: 2.2–14.3), and those working in departments with inadequate infrastructure (AOR = 5.1; 95% CI: 2.06–12.7). Qualitative findings supported these structural barriers and further identified automatic motivational constraints, including optimism bias, cognitive overload, and habitual routines. A substantial knowledge-practice gap exists among frontline staff, driven primarily by structural limitations as well as cognitive and motivational barriers. Closing this gap requires more than guideline dissemination; hospital management should prioritize infrastructure improvements, including ward-level hand hygiene stations, regular formal training, and active local IPC committees to strengthen standard clinical compliance.
Related
- MRSA Knowledge, Infection-Prevention Practices, and Antibiotic Use Without Clinician Consultation Among Hajj Pilgrims Arriving in Madinah, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study †
- COVID-19 infection prevention and control preparedness among healthcare workers in public hospitals in Yemen: a comprehensive assessment of knowledge, practices, perceptions, and institutional readiness
- A preliminary qualitative exploration of perceived barriers and facilitators prior to implementation of a pressure injury prevention program in home care: perspectives of care managers in Japan.
- Translating knowledge gaps to practice: a knowledge, attitude and practice study based on 5A approach to improve smoking cessation training for healthcare providers in Karachi, Pakistan
- Oncology nurses' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to CAUTI prevention: a qualitative study guided by the nursing role effectiveness model.
BibTeX
@article{roba2026barriers,
title = {{Barriers and facilitators to translating infection prevention knowledge into clinical practice at Bule Hora University Teaching Hospital, Ethiopia: mixed-methods study}},
author = {Habtamu Roba and Hailu Lemma and Tibeso Gemechu and Lechisa Asefa and Gedeno Karbana and Megersa Werku and Mohammed Issa},
journal = {Scientific Reports},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-68359-z},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-68359-z},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Barriers and facilitators to translating infection prevention knowledge into clinical practice at Bule Hora University Teaching Hospital, Ethiopia: mixed-methods study
AU - Habtamu Roba
AU - Hailu Lemma
AU - Tibeso Gemechu
AU - Lechisa Asefa
AU - Gedeno Karbana
AU - Megersa Werku
AU - Mohammed Issa
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/01
JO - Scientific Reports
DO - 10.1038/s41598-026-68359-z
UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-68359-z
AB - Healthcare-associated infections remain a significant global challenge, with systemic and behavioral barriers often impeding the translation of knowledge into practice. This study assessed the barriers and facilitators to applying infection prevention knowledge among frontline healthcare workers at Bule Hora University Teaching Hospital in Southern Ethiopia. A concurrent triangulation (convergent parallel) mixed-methods design was employed from August to September 2025. Quantitative data were collected from 186 randomly selected healthcare workers using stratified sampling with proportional allocation, while qualitative data were obtained from eight purposively selected key informants. The Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation (COM-B) behavioral framework guided this study. Quantitative data were processed using Epi Info version 4.6.1 and analyzed with SPSS version 26. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors of compliance, and qualitative data were analyzed using a hybrid deductive-inductive thematic analysis. Findings were integrated at the interpretation stage using a joint display, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Overall, 66.7% (95% CI: 59.9–73.5) of frontline staff had moderate knowledge, whereas only 57.53% (95% CI: 50.0–64.2) had good compliance with infection prevention and control (IPC) practices. Key physical opportunity gaps included the lack of ward-level handwashing facilities (55.4%), improper waste segregation at the point of generation (60.2%), and the absence of Hepatitis B vaccination (54.8%). In the multivariable logistic regression model, poor IPC compliance was significantly more likely among healthcare workers with a high workload (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 3.4; 95% CI: 1.4–8.4), those without ward-level handwashing facilities (AOR = 5.7; 95% CI: 2.2–14.3), and those working in departments with inadequate infrastructure (AOR = 5.1; 95% CI: 2.06–12.7). Qualitative findings supported these structural barriers and further identified automatic motivational constraints, including optimism bias, cognitive overload, and habitual routines. A substantial knowledge-practice gap exists among frontline staff, driven primarily by structural limitations as well as cognitive and motivational barriers. Closing this gap requires more than guideline dissemination; hospital management should prioritize infrastructure improvements, including ward-level hand hygiene stations, regular formal training, and active local IPC committees to strengthen standard clinical compliance.
SN - 2045-2322
ER -