Precision oncology in advanced melanoma: molecular landscapes and personalized therapy recommendations from the Molecular Tumor Board Freiburg.
11 affiliations
- 1Department of Medicine I-Medical Centre-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
- 2Comprehensive Cancer Center Freiburg, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
- 3Institute of Medical Bioinformatics and Systems Medicine (IBSM), Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
- 4German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, a partnership between DKFZ and Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
- 5Institute of Molecular Medicine and Cell Research (IMMZ), Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
- 6Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
- 7Department of Dermatology and Venereology-Medical Centre-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
- 8Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
- 9Department of Medicine III, Faculty of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
- 10Center of Personalized Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), University Hospital, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
- 11Department of Dermatology and Venereology-Medical Centre-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. [email protected].
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and BRAF/MEK kinase inhibitors have substantially improved survival in advanced melanoma; however, therapeutic resistance and severe toxicities underscore the ongoing need for alternative strategies. Here, we evaluate the clinical utility of multi-omic profiling, biomarker-stratified recommendations, and survival outcomes within a prospective cohort of 98 patients with advanced cutaneous or uveal melanoma evaluated by the Molecular Tumor Board Freiburg (MTB-FR) between 2021 and 2024. Completed profiling revealed at least one potential actionable target beyond classical BRAF V600 mutations in 83.8% of cases. Alterations in NRAS, atypical BRAF variants, CDK4/6 pathway amplifications, and DNA-damage response (DDR) gene mutations most frequently guided board recommendations. Biomarker-stratified therapies were recommended for 68.4% of patients, and personalized immunotherapy combinations for 72.4%. The treatment implementation rate was 33.8% (n = 27), achieving an overall disease control rate (DCR) of 42.9% and an overall response rate (ORR) of 10.7%. These findings demonstrate that comprehensive molecular profiling in a real-world setting uncovers actionable alterations, providing viable subsequent treatment avenues that may optimize outcomes for heavily pretreated melanoma patients beyond established standards of care. Ultimately, prospective, randomized, biomarker-driven trials remain essential to validate whether these individualized diagnostic strategies translate into a reproducible survival benefit.
Related
- Microbiome-driven precision psychiatry: integrating multi-omics, artificial intelligence, and personalized interventions along the gut-brain axis
- AI-integrated RNA therapeutics in precision oncology
- Exosomes and Extracellular Vesicles in Oncology: Next-Generation Smart Nanocarriers for Precision Cancer Therapy.
- Gut microbiota–cancer crosstalk: emerging molecular targets for personalized cancer treatment- a comprehensive review
- Conformational landscapes in cryo-electron tomography data based on molecular dynamics simulations
BibTeX
@article{lowinus2026precision,
title = {{Precision oncology in advanced melanoma: molecular landscapes and personalized therapy recommendations from the Molecular Tumor Board Freiburg.}},
author = {T Lowinus and V Schipperges and P Metzger and T Brummer and U Matysiak and E P Dopfer and M E Hess and M Fahrner and T Pauli and A Blaumeiser and H Becker and J Kuehn and M Rassner and J Falkenstein and H Bertemes and P Bovio and N Pinter and S Cysar and S Lehr and R Wäsch and L Gräßel and K Eyerich and A M Schultheis and O Schilling and S Lassmann and M Werner and A L Illert and J Duyster and R Zeiser and C C Miething and M Boerries and F Meiss and D Rafei},
journal = {NPJ precision oncology},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1038/s41698-026-01763-w},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42907470},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Precision oncology in advanced melanoma: molecular landscapes and personalized therapy recommendations from the Molecular Tumor Board Freiburg.
AU - T Lowinus
AU - V Schipperges
AU - P Metzger
AU - T Brummer
AU - U Matysiak
AU - E P Dopfer
AU - M E Hess
AU - M Fahrner
AU - T Pauli
AU - A Blaumeiser
AU - H Becker
AU - J Kuehn
AU - M Rassner
AU - J Falkenstein
AU - H Bertemes
AU - P Bovio
AU - N Pinter
AU - S Cysar
AU - S Lehr
AU - R Wäsch
AU - L Gräßel
AU - K Eyerich
AU - A M Schultheis
AU - O Schilling
AU - S Lassmann
AU - M Werner
AU - A L Illert
AU - J Duyster
AU - R Zeiser
AU - C C Miething
AU - M Boerries
AU - F Meiss
AU - D Rafei
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/21
JO - NPJ precision oncology
DO - 10.1038/s41698-026-01763-w
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42907470
AB - Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and BRAF/MEK kinase inhibitors have substantially improved survival in advanced melanoma; however, therapeutic resistance and severe toxicities underscore the ongoing need for alternative strategies. Here, we evaluate the clinical utility of multi-omic profiling, biomarker-stratified recommendations, and survival outcomes within a prospective cohort of 98 patients with advanced cutaneous or uveal melanoma evaluated by the Molecular Tumor Board Freiburg (MTB-FR) between 2021 and 2024. Completed profiling revealed at least one potential actionable target beyond classical BRAF V600 mutations in 83.8% of cases. Alterations in NRAS, atypical BRAF variants, CDK4/6 pathway amplifications, and DNA-damage response (DDR) gene mutations most frequently guided board recommendations. Biomarker-stratified therapies were recommended for 68.4% of patients, and personalized immunotherapy combinations for 72.4%. The treatment implementation rate was 33.8% (n = 27), achieving an overall disease control rate (DCR) of 42.9% and an overall response rate (ORR) of 10.7%. These findings demonstrate that comprehensive molecular profiling in a real-world setting uncovers actionable alterations, providing viable subsequent treatment avenues that may optimize outcomes for heavily pretreated melanoma patients beyond established standards of care. Ultimately, prospective, randomized, biomarker-driven trials remain essential to validate whether these individualized diagnostic strategies translate into a reproducible survival benefit.
SN - 2397-768X
ER -