Reference mapping and whole-genome alignment yield comparable phylogenomic inferences
- 1Technical University of Denmark
Abstract
Reference-genome choice can introduce mapping bias when sequencing data are analysed against a heterospecific genome, but it remains unclear how strongly this bias affects species-level phylogenomic inference. We tested this across Ursidae using nine species spanning approximately 20 million years of divergence, including the extinct giant short-faced bear (Arctodus simus). We independently mapped the same sequencing datasets to four reference genomes spanning a broad range of evolutionary distances and compared these with two assembly-based whole-genome-alignment approaches. We developed PhyloSlide to analyse all treatments consistently, offering a streamlined pipeline for sliding-window phylogenomics. Using this approach, we found that mapping reference choice strongly affected sequence recovery, with missing data generally increasing with evolutionary distance. Nonetheless, all six treatments recovered an identical species-tree topology and highly similar gene and site concordance factors. Relative divergence-time estimates were also largely consistent between approaches. Together, these findings demonstrate that mapping sequencing reads from multiple species to a shared reference genome can yield phylogenomic inferences comparable to whole-genome alignment, despite substantial reference-dependent sequence loss across millions of years of evolutionary divergence.
Related
- Comparable gonococcal resistance among PrEP users and non-users in Denmark: a phylogenomic study
- Guide-tree bias of whole genome alignment can mislead phylogenomic analyses
- Empirical Estimation of Ambient Contamination in Combinatorial Single-Cell Methods Using Multi-Reference Mapping
- Evolutionary Diversification of Nitric Oxide Signaling Components Across Metazoa: A Comparative Phylogenomic Analysis
- A comprehensive phylogenomic framework for brachiopod evolution among lophotrochozoans
BibTeX
@misc{westbury2026reference,
title = {{Reference mapping and whole-genome alignment yield comparable phylogenomic inferences}},
author = {M. V. Westbury and D. A. Duchene},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.64898/2026.10.20.760391},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.20.760391v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Reference mapping and whole-genome alignment yield comparable phylogenomic inferences
AU - M. V. Westbury
AU - D. A. Duchene
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/20
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.10.20.760391
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.20.760391v1
AB - Reference-genome choice can introduce mapping bias when sequencing data are analysed against a heterospecific genome, but it remains unclear how strongly this bias affects species-level phylogenomic inference. We tested this across Ursidae using nine species spanning approximately 20 million years of divergence, including the extinct giant short-faced bear (Arctodus simus). We independently mapped the same sequencing datasets to four reference genomes spanning a broad range of evolutionary distances and compared these with two assembly-based whole-genome-alignment approaches. We developed PhyloSlide to analyse all treatments consistently, offering a streamlined pipeline for sliding-window phylogenomics. Using this approach, we found that mapping reference choice strongly affected sequence recovery, with missing data generally increasing with evolutionary distance. Nonetheless, all six treatments recovered an identical species-tree topology and highly similar gene and site concordance factors. Relative divergence-time estimates were also largely consistent between approaches. Together, these findings demonstrate that mapping sequencing reads from multiple species to a shared reference genome can yield phylogenomic inferences comparable to whole-genome alignment, despite substantial reference-dependent sequence loss across millions of years of evolutionary divergence.
ER -