Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,761 studies31 sourcesUpdated 19 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of nanobiotechnology

Functionalized metal-organic frameworks as smart nanoplatforms: advancing tumor precision therapy through post-synthetic surface tailoring, challenges, and prospects for clinical translation.

15 affiliations
  1. 1Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  2. 2Student Research Committee, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  3. 3Department of Medical Nanotechnology, Faculty of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  4. 4Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. [email protected].
  5. 5Department of Medical Nanotechnology, Faculty of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. [email protected].
  6. 6Research and Development Department, Nano Asayesh Parsina Co (NAP), Tehran, Iran. [email protected].
  7. 7Department of Medical Nanotechnology, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  8. 8Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  9. 9Nanotechnology Research Center, Pharmaceutical Technology Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
  10. 10Department of Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
  11. 11Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  12. 12Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  13. 13Colorectal Research Center, Burn Research Center, Neuroscience Research Center, and Razi Drug Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  14. 14Department of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1, Warsaw, 02-097, Poland.
  15. 15Department of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1, Warsaw, 02-097, Poland. [email protected].

Abstract

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have garnered significant attention as versatile nanocarriers for oncological drug delivery, owing to their exceptional porosity, structural tunability, extensive specific surface areas, and favorable drug loading and release kinetics, which collectively enable targeted payload delivery and reduced systemic toxicity. Nevertheless, the clinical promise of unmodified MOFs is severely curtailed by substantial in vivo biological barriers-including rapid bio-clearance, the immunosuppressive and acidic tumor microenvironment (TME), and inefficient cellular internalization-challenges that are ubiquitous across nanomedicine platforms and critically undermine therapeutic outcomes. This review provides a comprehensive examination of post-synthetic modification (PSM) as an indispensable strategy to surmount these obstacles. It systematically categorizes the diverse array of surface modifiers reported to date into natural polymers, synthetic polymers, nonpolymeric small molecules, inorganic materials, and multifunctional hybrid architectures, while elucidating how each class can enhance biocompatibility, colloidal stability, circulation half-life, active targeting, and stimuli-responsive cargo release. Crucially, the review critically appraises the intrinsic trade-offs introduced by surface engineering, including increased hydrodynamic diameter, impaired tumor penetration, heightened synthetic and characterization complexity, and unpredictable perturbations to biodegradation pathways and immune system interactions. Despite robust preclinical validation, the translational trajectory of surface-engineered MOF-based therapeutics remains encumbered by formidable challenges spanning scalable and reproducible manufacturing, long-term biosafety assessment, and stringent regulatory approval. By delineating current advances, critical limitations, and prospective directions, this review highlights the delicate equilibrium between surface functionalization and biological performance that must be achieved to realize the clinical potential of PSM-optimized MOF nanomedicines.

Related

  1. Biomass-to-biomass strategy: sulphonic acid functionalized covalent organic frameworks for metal-free esterification of biomass-derived acids.
    Shradhanjali Samal, Muskan Memon, Entesar Alhousin +2
    RSC advancesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral chemistryEurope PMC
  2. Electronic Modulation of Bromide and Iodide Recognition in Functionalized Hexacationic Cages: A Comparative Theoretical Study of meta - and para -Frameworks
    Fernando de Melo Cruz, Vinícius Glitz, João Vítor de Jesus Damante +4
    ACS OmegaPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral chemistryCrossref
  3. Functionalized bioresorbable biliary stents: materials design, coating engineering, and clinical translation.
    Bowen Wang, Wei Gong
    RSC advancesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMaterials & polymersEurope PMCPMC
  4. Advancing Blue‐Light Photoactivatable TAM Kinase Inhibitors for Cancer Treatment: Challenges in Using π ‐Extended Coumarins as Photocleavable Protecting Groups
    Sébastien Billotte, Gaëlle Fontaine, Frédéric Bolze +3
    ChemPhotoChemPeer-reviewedCC BYGeneral biologyMedicinal chemistry & drug discoveryHAL
  5. Advances in Polydopamine-Based Nanoplatforms: Antioxidant Mechanisms and Applications in Oxidative Stress-Mediated Diseases
    Zhilin Wang, Zhu Liu, Luming Song +6
    Nano-Micro LettersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text12 citedMaterials & polymersOpenAlex
BibTeX
@article{velayati2026functionalized,
  title = {{Functionalized metal-organic frameworks as smart nanoplatforms: advancing tumor precision therapy through post-synthetic surface tailoring, challenges, and prospects for clinical translation.}},
  author = {Shiva Velayati and Masoumeh Zahmatkeshan and Fariba Esmaeili and Seyed Mohammad Hosseini and Seyed Mahdi Rezayat and Mahmoud Reza Jaafari and Kazem Mousavizadeh and Gholamreza Taheripak and Moein Adel and Anna Lesniak and Iraj Alipourfard},
  journal = {Journal of nanobiotechnology},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1186/s12951-026-04757-9},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42907997},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Functionalized metal-organic frameworks as smart nanoplatforms: advancing tumor precision therapy through post-synthetic surface tailoring, challenges, and prospects for clinical translation.
AU  - Shiva Velayati
AU  - Masoumeh Zahmatkeshan
AU  - Fariba Esmaeili
AU  - Seyed Mohammad Hosseini
AU  - Seyed Mahdi Rezayat
AU  - Mahmoud Reza Jaafari
AU  - Kazem Mousavizadeh
AU  - Gholamreza Taheripak
AU  - Moein Adel
AU  - Anna Lesniak
AU  - Iraj Alipourfard
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - Journal of nanobiotechnology
DO  - 10.1186/s12951-026-04757-9
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42907997
AB  - Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have garnered significant attention as versatile nanocarriers for oncological drug delivery, owing to their exceptional porosity, structural tunability, extensive specific surface areas, and favorable drug loading and release kinetics, which collectively enable targeted payload delivery and reduced systemic toxicity. Nevertheless, the clinical promise of unmodified MOFs is severely curtailed by substantial in vivo biological barriers-including rapid bio-clearance, the immunosuppressive and acidic tumor microenvironment (TME), and inefficient cellular internalization-challenges that are ubiquitous across nanomedicine platforms and critically undermine therapeutic outcomes. This review provides a comprehensive examination of post-synthetic modification (PSM) as an indispensable strategy to surmount these obstacles. It systematically categorizes the diverse array of surface modifiers reported to date into natural polymers, synthetic polymers, nonpolymeric small molecules, inorganic materials, and multifunctional hybrid architectures, while elucidating how each class can enhance biocompatibility, colloidal stability, circulation half-life, active targeting, and stimuli-responsive cargo release. Crucially, the review critically appraises the intrinsic trade-offs introduced by surface engineering, including increased hydrodynamic diameter, impaired tumor penetration, heightened synthetic and characterization complexity, and unpredictable perturbations to biodegradation pathways and immune system interactions. Despite robust preclinical validation, the translational trajectory of surface-engineered MOF-based therapeutics remains encumbered by formidable challenges spanning scalable and reproducible manufacturing, long-term biosafety assessment, and stringent regulatory approval. By delineating current advances, critical limitations, and prospective directions, this review highlights the delicate equilibrium between surface functionalization and biological performance that must be achieved to realize the clinical potential of PSM-optimized MOF nanomedicines.
SN  - 1477-3155
ER  -