Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,335 studies31 sourcesUpdated 38 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCJournal of International Medical Research

Artificial intelligence in hepatitis: Advances in diagnosis, treatment optimization, and prognostic prediction

Abstract

Hepatitis remains a major global health challenge and an important contributor to liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver-related mortality worldwide. Early diagnosis, effective treatment selection, and accurate prognostic stratification remain critical unmet needs in clinical hepatology. Artificial intelligence, particularly machine learning and deep learning, has emerged as a promising approach to addressing these challenges through the integration and analysis of large-scale, heterogeneous biomedical datasets. This narrative review synthesizes advances in artificial intelligence applications in hepatitis research and clinical practice published over the past decade, organized across three clinical domains: diagnosis, treatment optimization, and prognosis prediction. In the diagnostic domain, artificial intelligence–based approaches have been applied to medical imaging, digital pathology, and multi-omics data to enhance the detection, classification, and staging of liver disease. In the therapeutic domain, machine learning models have been increasingly deployed to support drug discovery, optimize therapeutic regimens, and predict individual treatment responses. In the prognostic domain, artificial intelligence–driven models have shown promising performance in predicting disease progression, survival outcomes, and clinical complications. Nevertheless, key limitations persist, including data heterogeneity, limited external generalizability, and barriers to clinical translation. Future progress will depend on prospective multicenter evaluation, use of interoperable multimodal data, development of transparent models that account for uncertainty, and evidence that artificial intelligence improves clinical decisions and patient outcomes rather than performance metrics alone.

Related

  1. Prognostic prediction of pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma using a transformer-based artificial intelligence model: a two-center retrospective cohort study
    Lei Liu, Linchuan Liang, Dawei Wang +7
    Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyCrossrefDOAJ
  2. Artificial intelligence empowering the diagnosis and treatment of rotator cuff tears: A systematic review from image optimization to prognosis prediction.
    Haitao Wang, Deming Guo, Yingqi Gao +2
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  3. An explainable artificial intelligence system for prognostic assessment and decision support in diabetic foot ulcer care: a multicentre derivation and validation study with prospective randomised evaluation
    Jia-Yu Zhang, Yangyang Zhuang, Qingping Cao +9
    eClinicalMedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0General medicineCrossref
  4. Artificial Intelligence‐Assisted Automated Optical Coherence Tomography Analysis for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Planning: From Plaque Analysis to Precision Lesion Preparation and Stent Optimization
    Kevin Mohee, Eirinaios Tsiartas, Jason Sangha +2
    Journal of the American Heart AssociationPeer-reviewedLicence not statedCardiovascular medicineCrossref
  5. Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Diagnosis, Phenotypic Characterization, and Risk Prediction
    Yu-Jie Xiang, Yu-Cong Zheng, Ju Han +3
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{qu2026artificial,
  title = {{Artificial intelligence in hepatitis: Advances in diagnosis, treatment optimization, and prognostic prediction}},
  author = {Jie Qu and Zhouyi Xie and Junbo Xiang and Lingqian Li and Ying Chen and Jingwen Sheng and Yan Li and Keda Yang},
  journal = {Journal of International Medical Research},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1177/03000605261500644},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605261500644},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Artificial intelligence in hepatitis: Advances in diagnosis, treatment optimization, and prognostic prediction
AU  - Jie Qu
AU  - Zhouyi Xie
AU  - Junbo Xiang
AU  - Lingqian Li
AU  - Ying Chen
AU  - Jingwen Sheng
AU  - Yan Li
AU  - Keda Yang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/24
JO  - Journal of International Medical Research
DO  - 10.1177/03000605261500644
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605261500644
AB  - Hepatitis remains a major global health challenge and an important contributor to liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver-related mortality worldwide. Early diagnosis, effective treatment selection, and accurate prognostic stratification remain critical unmet needs in clinical hepatology. Artificial intelligence, particularly machine learning and deep learning, has emerged as a promising approach to addressing these challenges through the integration and analysis of large-scale, heterogeneous biomedical datasets. This narrative review synthesizes advances in artificial intelligence applications in hepatitis research and clinical practice published over the past decade, organized across three clinical domains: diagnosis, treatment optimization, and prognosis prediction. In the diagnostic domain, artificial intelligence–based approaches have been applied to medical imaging, digital pathology, and multi-omics data to enhance the detection, classification, and staging of liver disease. In the therapeutic domain, machine learning models have been increasingly deployed to support drug discovery, optimize therapeutic regimens, and predict individual treatment responses. In the prognostic domain, artificial intelligence–driven models have shown promising performance in predicting disease progression, survival outcomes, and clinical complications. Nevertheless, key limitations persist, including data heterogeneity, limited external generalizability, and barriers to clinical translation. Future progress will depend on prospective multicenter evaluation, use of interoperable multimodal data, development of transparent models that account for uncertainty, and evidence that artificial intelligence improves clinical decisions and patient outcomes rather than performance metrics alone.
SN  - 1473-2300
SN  - 0300-0605
ER  -