Pars plana vitrectomy under air infusion versus conventional fluid infusion for dense vitreous hemorrhage: a retrospective comparative study.
- 1The National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027, China.
- 2The National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027, China. [email protected].
Abstract
Background
Vitreous hemorrhage (VH) remains a significant clinical challenge in vitreoretinal surgery. Conventional pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) under balanced salt solution (BSS) infusion is limited by poor intraoperative visualization when hemorrhagic vitreous mixes with the irrigating solution. Vitrectomy under air infusion has been proposed as an alternative approach that may overcome these limitations. This study aimed to compare the surgical efficiency and short-term outcomes of vitrectomy under air infusion versus conventional BSS infusion in the management of dense vitreous hemorrhage.Methods
This retrospective comparative study included 32 eyes of 32 patients who underwent 23-gauge PPV for vitreous hemorrhage at a single center between August 2024 and August 2025. Sixteen eyes received air infusion (air group) and 16 eyes received conventional BSS infusion (BSS group). All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon. Primary outcome was effective vitrectomy time. Secondary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) at 1 month postoperatively, as well as intraoperative and postoperative complications.Results
Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics were comparable between groups. The mean effective vitrectomy time was shorter in the air group than in the BSS group (4.17 ± 0.97 min vs. 5.02 ± 1.18 min; p = 0.033; Cohen's d = 0.79). At 1-month follow-up, BCVA (0.336 ± 0.24 vs. 0.366 ± 0.36 logMAR; p = 0.785) and CMT (298.815 ± 132.45 vs. 265.750 ± 98.91 μm; p = 0.430) were comparable between groups. No intraoperative complications occurred in either group. Postoperative complications at 1 month occurred in 3 eyes (18.8%) in the BSS group and 1 eye (6.3%) in the air group; the study was not powered to compare complication rates.Conclusions
Vitrectomy under air infusion was associated with a shorter effective vitrectomy time than conventional BSS infusion, while achieving comparable short-term visual and anatomical outcomes. The air-vitreous interface may improve intraoperative visualization of hemorrhagic vitreous. As the two techniques produced equivalent short-term outcomes, the potential advantage of air infusion appears to lie in intraoperative efficiency rather than in superior clinical results. Larger prospective studies with longer follow-up are warranted to confirm these findings.
Related
- Twelve-month outcomes of subretinal tenecteplase-assisted vitrectomy for large submacular hemorrhage secondary to polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: a retrospective consecutive case series
- Comparative outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional minilaparotomy-assisted specimen extraction in colorectal cancer: A single-center retrospective study.
- Ultrasound-guided versus conventional sinus tract laser closure for adolescent sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease: a retrospective comparative study
- A comparative study on clinical efficacy between tension-free transtendon repair and conventional transtendon repair for partial articular-sided supraspinatus tendon avulsion (PASTA) : Study design: retrospective comparative study; level of evidence, III.
- Lean dual-portal versus conventional multi-portal robotic-assisted thoracic surgery for anatomical lung resection: a retrospective comparative cohort study of a sustainable approach harmonizing clinical efficiency, environmental protection, and next-generation education.
BibTeX
@article{xu2026pars,
title = {{Pars plana vitrectomy under air infusion versus conventional fluid infusion for dense vitreous hemorrhage: a retrospective comparative study.}},
author = {Ke Xu and Bi Sun and Ying Zhang and Weiliang Fan and Ronghan Wu},
journal = {BMC ophthalmology},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1186/s12886-026-05137-5},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42902236},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Pars plana vitrectomy under air infusion versus conventional fluid infusion for dense vitreous hemorrhage: a retrospective comparative study.
AU - Ke Xu
AU - Bi Sun
AU - Ying Zhang
AU - Weiliang Fan
AU - Ronghan Wu
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/01
JO - BMC ophthalmology
DO - 10.1186/s12886-026-05137-5
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42902236
AB - Background Vitreous hemorrhage (VH) remains a significant clinical challenge in vitreoretinal surgery. Conventional pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) under balanced salt solution (BSS) infusion is limited by poor intraoperative visualization when hemorrhagic vitreous mixes with the irrigating solution. Vitrectomy under air infusion has been proposed as an alternative approach that may overcome these limitations. This study aimed to compare the surgical efficiency and short-term outcomes of vitrectomy under air infusion versus conventional BSS infusion in the management of dense vitreous hemorrhage.Methods This retrospective comparative study included 32 eyes of 32 patients who underwent 23-gauge PPV for vitreous hemorrhage at a single center between August 2024 and August 2025. Sixteen eyes received air infusion (air group) and 16 eyes received conventional BSS infusion (BSS group). All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon. Primary outcome was effective vitrectomy time. Secondary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) at 1 month postoperatively, as well as intraoperative and postoperative complications.Results Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics were comparable between groups. The mean effective vitrectomy time was shorter in the air group than in the BSS group (4.17 ± 0.97 min vs. 5.02 ± 1.18 min; p = 0.033; Cohen's d = 0.79). At 1-month follow-up, BCVA (0.336 ± 0.24 vs. 0.366 ± 0.36 logMAR; p = 0.785) and CMT (298.815 ± 132.45 vs. 265.750 ± 98.91 μm; p = 0.430) were comparable between groups. No intraoperative complications occurred in either group. Postoperative complications at 1 month occurred in 3 eyes (18.8%) in the BSS group and 1 eye (6.3%) in the air group; the study was not powered to compare complication rates.Conclusions Vitrectomy under air infusion was associated with a shorter effective vitrectomy time than conventional BSS infusion, while achieving comparable short-term visual and anatomical outcomes. The air-vitreous interface may improve intraoperative visualization of hemorrhagic vitreous. As the two techniques produced equivalent short-term outcomes, the potential advantage of air infusion appears to lie in intraoperative efficiency rather than in superior clinical results. Larger prospective studies with longer follow-up are warranted to confirm these findings.
SN - 1471-2415
ER -