Pathological Response Depth and Pre-Treatment Risk Stratification After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer.
7 affiliations
- 1Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Square 2, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.
- 2Surgery Clinic III, "Pius Brînzeu" County Emergency Clinical Hospital, Liviu Rebreanu Boulevard 156, 300723 Timișoara, Romania.
- 3Department I-Anatomy and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Square 2, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.
- 4Discipline of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.
- 5Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 1 Decembrie Square 10, 410073 Oradea, Romania.
- 6Surgical Oncology Department, Emergency County Hospital Oradea, Strada Gheorghe Doja 65, 410169 Oradea, Romania.
- 7Department III Functional Sciences, Division of Public Health and Management, Faculty of Medicine, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Splaiul Tudor Vladimirescu 14, 300173 Timișoara, Romania.
Abstract
Background and objectives
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is standard care for locally advanced rectal cancer, yet whether benefit derives from treatment receipt or from response depth remains debated. We examined nCRT receipt and tumour regression against outcome, and whether poor response is predictable beforehand.Materials and methods
Eighty-nine consecutive patients undergoing resection for rectal or rectosigmoid adenocarcinoma (2020-2022; median follow-up 16 months) were analysed; outcomes were described in patients receiving nCRT (n = 60) and in those undergoing upfront surgery (n = 29), two groups whose allocation depended on stage and location and which are therefore presented as distinct clinical populations rather than as directly comparable arms. Response was graded by modified Ryan tumour regression grade. An exploratory four-item Pre-treatment Response Risk (PRR) score was derived and internally validated by bootstrap optimism correction. Comparisons used the Student t-test or Mann-Whitney U test and the chi-square or Fisher exact test, with logistic (maximum likelihood and Firth-penalised) and Cox regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses.Results
nCRT exposure was not statistically associated with mortality during follow-up (21.7% vs. 24.1%, p = 0.792), metastatic recurrence (21.7% vs. 20.7%, p > 0.999) or textbook outcome (35.0% vs. 34.5%, p > 0.999); the association with mortality remained non-significant after covariate adjustment in the whole cohort (Cox hazard ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.24-1.83) and in a sensitivity analysis restricted to rectal tumours (Charlson-adjusted Firth odds ratio 0.52, 95% CI 0.08-3.94). The median follow-up of 16 months was too short to assess disease-free survival. Among patients who received nCRT, mortality varied with the depth of pathological response rather than with treatment receipt itself, from 0% in complete responders to 62% in poor responders (p < 0.001), and each one-grade worsening of the tumour regression grade multiplied the odds of death (OR 6.26, 95% CI 1.74-22.5, p = 0.005), although response grade, residual ypT/ypN stage and comorbidity were closely collinear. Comorbidity was associated with mortality (Charlson index, Firth-penalised OR 3.41 per point, 95% CI 1.89-6.15, p < 0.001) whereas nCRT was not (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.08-1.72). In the derivation cohort, the PRR score discriminated poor response (apparent AUC 0.95, optimism-corrected 0.89) and was associated with major morbidity, which rose from 0% in the lowest to 93% in the highest risk band, and with mortality, which rose from 0% to 71% (p < 0.001 for each outcome).Conclusions
Within this cohort, nCRT exposure was not statistically associated with the evaluated short-term outcomes, which does not establish equivalence between strategies; depth of pathological response and host comorbidity carried the prognostic information, and routine pre-treatment variables showed promise for anticipating poor response. External validation is required before any clinical use.
Related
- Complete pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer and systemic oncologic benefit: a retrospective cohort study in Korea.
- Analysis of the Correlation Between Peripheral Blood Lymphocyte Subsets and Pathological Complete Response Rate in Rectal Cancer Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
- Prediction Models for Pathological Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Risk Stratification Based on Endoscopic Ulcerative Findings in Patients with Endoscopic Non-Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.
- Pre-Treatment CD44 and CD47 Expression and Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Therapy in Breast Cancer: An Exploratory Single-Center Study
BibTeX
@article{negru2026pathological,
title = {{Pathological Response Depth and Pre-Treatment Risk Stratification After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer.}},
author = {Tibiana Negru and Loredana Gabriela Stana and Livia Stanga and Danut Dejeu and Adrian Cosmin Ilie and Stelian Pantea},
journal = {Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/medsci14060632},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42930551},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Pathological Response Depth and Pre-Treatment Risk Stratification After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer.
AU - Tibiana Negru
AU - Loredana Gabriela Stana
AU - Livia Stanga
AU - Danut Dejeu
AU - Adrian Cosmin Ilie
AU - Stelian Pantea
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/02
JO - Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)
DO - 10.3390/medsci14060632
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42930551
AB - Background and objectives Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is standard care for locally advanced rectal cancer, yet whether benefit derives from treatment receipt or from response depth remains debated. We examined nCRT receipt and tumour regression against outcome, and whether poor response is predictable beforehand.Materials and methods Eighty-nine consecutive patients undergoing resection for rectal or rectosigmoid adenocarcinoma (2020-2022; median follow-up 16 months) were analysed; outcomes were described in patients receiving nCRT (n = 60) and in those undergoing upfront surgery (n = 29), two groups whose allocation depended on stage and location and which are therefore presented as distinct clinical populations rather than as directly comparable arms. Response was graded by modified Ryan tumour regression grade. An exploratory four-item Pre-treatment Response Risk (PRR) score was derived and internally validated by bootstrap optimism correction. Comparisons used the Student t-test or Mann-Whitney U test and the chi-square or Fisher exact test, with logistic (maximum likelihood and Firth-penalised) and Cox regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses.Results nCRT exposure was not statistically associated with mortality during follow-up (21.7% vs. 24.1%, p = 0.792), metastatic recurrence (21.7% vs. 20.7%, p > 0.999) or textbook outcome (35.0% vs. 34.5%, p > 0.999); the association with mortality remained non-significant after covariate adjustment in the whole cohort (Cox hazard ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.24-1.83) and in a sensitivity analysis restricted to rectal tumours (Charlson-adjusted Firth odds ratio 0.52, 95% CI 0.08-3.94). The median follow-up of 16 months was too short to assess disease-free survival. Among patients who received nCRT, mortality varied with the depth of pathological response rather than with treatment receipt itself, from 0% in complete responders to 62% in poor responders (p < 0.001), and each one-grade worsening of the tumour regression grade multiplied the odds of death (OR 6.26, 95% CI 1.74-22.5, p = 0.005), although response grade, residual ypT/ypN stage and comorbidity were closely collinear. Comorbidity was associated with mortality (Charlson index, Firth-penalised OR 3.41 per point, 95% CI 1.89-6.15, p < 0.001) whereas nCRT was not (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.08-1.72). In the derivation cohort, the PRR score discriminated poor response (apparent AUC 0.95, optimism-corrected 0.89) and was associated with major morbidity, which rose from 0% in the lowest to 93% in the highest risk band, and with mortality, which rose from 0% to 71% (p < 0.001 for each outcome).Conclusions Within this cohort, nCRT exposure was not statistically associated with the evaluated short-term outcomes, which does not establish equivalence between strategies; depth of pathological response and host comorbidity carried the prognostic information, and routine pre-treatment variables showed promise for anticipating poor response. External validation is required before any clinical use.
SN - 2076-3271
ER -