Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
210,043 studies31 sourcesUpdated 54 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine

Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: A Health Economic Perspective

  • Megan B. Meechem1,2
  • Kevin Liu3
  • Toshiro WS Sembo3
  • Holly N Smith3
  • Daniel D Holloway3
  • Muhammad R Ahsan3
  • Ganesh Shanmugam3
  • Bob Kiaii3
  • William DT Kent3
  • Corey Adams3
  • Ali Fatehi Hassanabad3,4
4 affiliations
  1. 1Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
  2. 2Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
  3. 3Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiac Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
  4. 4Section of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York Presbyterian University, New York, NY 10032, USA
Read full textPDFDOICite

Abstract

This study aimed to review the contemporary literature on the health economics of minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS). MICS is being increasingly adopted worldwide. While the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of MICS have been established, uncertainty remains regarding the health economic aspect of MICS. This review aims to address that knowledge gap. This is a comprehensive narrative review of articles evaluating the health economics of MICS across various jurisdictions and healthcare systems. Electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Scopus, were searched from inception through November 2025. Search terms included combinations of MICS, health economics, minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass, mini-aortic valve replacement, mini-thoracotomy, hemi-sternotomy, aortic valve replacement, right anterior mini thoracotomy, robotic cardiac surgery, robot-assisted cardiac surgery, video-assisted cardiac surgery, and port-access cardiac surgery. Across procedure types, studies consistently demonstrated that high-volume, well-standardized MICS programs can achieve cost neutrality or cost savings, relative to conventional surgery, with reported hospital cost reductions ranging from approximately 9% for mini-aortic valve replacement to CAD 16,700 for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. These savings are largely attributable to improved postoperative efficiency and reduced resource utilization. In contrast, centers with low surgical volumes or fragmented workflows often incur significantly higher costs per case and risk underutilizing expensive technologies, such as robotic systems. When implemented in well-resourced, experienced centers, MICS appears to be a promising, value-driven strategy for contemporary cardiac care. Health systems should consider centralizing MICS services to optimize capital investment and realize sustainable economic value, rather than distributing these resources broadly across lower-volume centers.

Related

  1. Transaxillary valve surgery: innovation through simplicity in minimally invasive cardiac surgery
    Annals of Cardiothoracic SurgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. A case report-prone position ventilation as an ECMO sparing strategy for re-expansion pulmonary edema following minimally invasive cardiac surgery.
    Alok Sonthalia, Charles Chan, Rana Sayeed +2
    Saudi journal of anaesthesiaPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
  3. Cost-Effectiveness of Angle-Based Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS): A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations.
    See Teng Tan, Shayne S Tan, Hla M Htoon +3
    Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Postoperative analgesia and recovery after minimally invasive cardiac surgery
    H. Note, T. Kajiura, A. Muramatsu +10
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiamedRxiv
  5. Preoperative platelet-related inflammatory burden is associated with delayed early hemodynamic recovery following minimally invasive cardiac surgery.
    Bekir Boğachan Akkaya, Enis Burak Gül, Gizem Işık +4
    BMC cardiovascular disordersPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textOncologyEurope PMCDOAJ

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@article{meechem2026minimally,
  title = {{Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: A Health Economic Perspective}},
  author = {Megan B. Meechem and Kevin Liu and Toshiro WS Sembo and Holly N Smith and Daniel D Holloway and Muhammad R Ahsan and Ganesh Shanmugam and Bob Kiaii and William DT Kent and Corey Adams and Ali Fatehi Hassanabad},
  journal = {Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.31083/rcm53209},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.31083/rcm53209},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: A Health Economic Perspective
AU  - Megan B. Meechem
AU  - Kevin Liu
AU  - Toshiro WS Sembo
AU  - Holly N Smith
AU  - Daniel D Holloway
AU  - Muhammad R Ahsan
AU  - Ganesh Shanmugam
AU  - Bob Kiaii
AU  - William DT Kent
AU  - Corey Adams
AU  - Ali Fatehi Hassanabad
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/12
JO  - Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
DO  - 10.31083/rcm53209
UR  - https://doi.org/10.31083/rcm53209
AB  - This study aimed to review the contemporary literature on the health economics of minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS). MICS is being increasingly adopted worldwide. While the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of MICS have been established, uncertainty remains regarding the health economic aspect of MICS. This review aims to address that knowledge gap. This is a comprehensive narrative review of articles evaluating the health economics of MICS across various jurisdictions and healthcare systems. Electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Scopus, were searched from inception through November 2025. Search terms included combinations of MICS, health economics, minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass, mini-aortic valve replacement, mini-thoracotomy, hemi-sternotomy, aortic valve replacement, right anterior mini thoracotomy, robotic cardiac surgery, robot-assisted cardiac surgery, video-assisted cardiac surgery, and port-access cardiac surgery. Across procedure types, studies consistently demonstrated that high-volume, well-standardized MICS programs can achieve cost neutrality or cost savings, relative to conventional surgery, with reported hospital cost reductions ranging from approximately 9% for mini-aortic valve replacement to CAD 16,700 for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. These savings are largely attributable to improved postoperative efficiency and reduced resource utilization. In contrast, centers with low surgical volumes or fragmented workflows often incur significantly higher costs per case and risk underutilizing expensive technologies, such as robotic systems. When implemented in well-resourced, experienced centers, MICS appears to be a promising, value-driven strategy for contemporary cardiac care. Health systems should consider centralizing MICS services to optimize capital investment and realize sustainable economic value, rather than distributing these resources broadly across lower-volume centers.
SN  - 1530-6550
SN  - 2153-8174
ER  -