Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 51 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Environmental Chemistry Letters

Marine plastic pollution and bioplastic alternatives: a review

Abstract

Marine environments are polluted by plastics debris originating from land sources and from plastics used in maritime sectors such as fisheries and aquaculture, shipping, and offshore energy infrastructures. Here we review marine plastic pollution with emphasis on plastic sources, socioeconomic impact on marine industries, regulations, circular economy, and the use of bioplastics to mitigate pollution. Marine pollution sources include fisheries, aquaculture, shipping, boat industries, tourism, offshore energy plants, and artificial reefs. Fisheries and aquaculture use about 2.1 million tons of plastic annually and contribute approximately 18% of marine-based plastic pollution, primarily through lost, abandoned, or discarded fishing gear. Maritime transport contributes to plastic pollution through waste discharge, accidental container losses, and emissions from paint coatings. Marine coatings alone account for approximately 3.7% of primary microplastics entering the ocean. Coastal and marine tourism, and cruise ships generate plastic pollution via single-use plastic waste and greywater release. Artificial reefs generate plastic pollution via weathering of underwater structures. The use of bioplastics in marine and coastal tourism is increasing, particularly for single-use packaging. Bioplastics are being tested in prototype gear and nets. Nonetheless, there are limitations in the use of bioplastics because some of them are not or hardly biodegradable, some of them are not biobased, and bioplastic-derived microplastics have been detected in marine environments and biota with ecotoxicological effects comparable to those of conventional microplastics.

Related

  1. A pioneering plastic particle footprint concept for addressing the challenges posed by plastic pollution
    Valérie Guillard, Elisa Chapuis, Joshua Sohn +1
    Science AdvancesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full text1 citedEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  2. Integrated environmental assessment of plastic pollution in the São Francisco River estuary, Brazil.
    Isabella Ferreira Nascimento Maynard, Pamela Cunha Bortoluzzi, Thigna Carvalho Batista +6
    Environmental monitoring and assessmentPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionEurope PMCPMC
  3. Integrated marine spatial planning for Chonburi Province, Thailand: Addressing pollution, blue carbon, and conservation
    Yue Qiao, Zhen Guo, Zhiwei Zhang +8
    Ecological IndicatorsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionDOAJ
  4. Tracking Blastocystis sp. in mussels from Northern France in a One Health context : Seasonal dynamics, implications in marine fecal pollution and risk in human health
    Manon Ryckman, Constance Denoyelle, Magali Chabé +8
    Environmental PollutionPeer-reviewedCC BYGeneral biologyEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  5. Early Life Ambient Air Pollution and Child Neurodevelopment: Critical Review of Cohort Evidence
    Abdulrahman A. Al-Atram, Mohammad Elkossi, Shimaa Elwardany Aly +4
    Journal of xenobioticsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{ali2026marine,
  title = {{Marine plastic pollution and bioplastic alternatives: a review}},
  author = {Wajid Ali and Périne Doyen and Rachid Amara},
  journal = {Environmental Chemistry Letters},
  year = {2026},
  month = may,
  doi = {10.1007/s10311-026-01906-2},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05828551v1},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Marine plastic pollution and bioplastic alternatives: a review
AU  - Wajid Ali
AU  - Périne Doyen
AU  - Rachid Amara
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/05/21
JO  - Environmental Chemistry Letters
DO  - 10.1007/s10311-026-01906-2
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05828551v1
AB  - Marine environments are polluted by plastics debris originating from land sources and from plastics used in maritime sectors such as fisheries and aquaculture, shipping, and offshore energy infrastructures. Here we review marine plastic pollution with emphasis on plastic sources, socioeconomic impact on marine industries, regulations, circular economy, and the use of bioplastics to mitigate pollution. Marine pollution sources include fisheries, aquaculture, shipping, boat industries, tourism, offshore energy plants, and artificial reefs. Fisheries and aquaculture use about 2.1 million tons of plastic annually and contribute approximately 18% of marine-based plastic pollution, primarily through lost, abandoned, or discarded fishing gear. Maritime transport contributes to plastic pollution through waste discharge, accidental container losses, and emissions from paint coatings. Marine coatings alone account for approximately 3.7% of primary microplastics entering the ocean. Coastal and marine tourism, and cruise ships generate plastic pollution via single-use plastic waste and greywater release. Artificial reefs generate plastic pollution via weathering of underwater structures. The use of bioplastics in marine and coastal tourism is increasing, particularly for single-use packaging. Bioplastics are being tested in prototype gear and nets. Nonetheless, there are limitations in the use of bioplastics because some of them are not or hardly biodegradable, some of them are not biobased, and bioplastic-derived microplastics have been detected in marine environments and biota with ecotoxicological effects comparable to those of conventional microplastics.
SN  - 1610-3653
SN  - 1610-3661
ER  -