Comparative analysis of coronal balance with clinical correlation between degenerative and isthmic lumbar spondylolisthesis: a retrospective study
- 1Department of Spine Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- 2Department of Spine Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
Abstract
ObjectiveFew studies have examined the relationship between lumbar spondylolisthesis and coronal balance. This study compared coronal radiographic parameters between degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) and isthmic spondylolisthesis (IS) and investigated their associations with clinical characteristics.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 150 patients with single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis and persistent symptoms after at least 3 months of conservative treatment. Standing whole-spine anteroposterior radiographs were used to measure clavicle angle, T1 tilt, pelvic coronal tilt, segmental wedge angle, spondylolisthesis vertebral tilt angle, lateral vertebral translation, lumbar Cobb angle, lumbar coronal balance, and C7 plumb line deviation from the central sacral vertical line. Demographic, clinical, and radiographic variables were compared between groups. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors distinguishing DS from IS. A decision tree assessed whether segmental wedge angle predicted lower limb pain distribution in DS.ResultsPatients with DS were older, whereas those with IS were taller and heavier. Segmental wedge angle, spondylolisthesis vertebral tilt angle, and lumbar coronal balance were greater in the DS group than in the IS group (2.7 ± 1.9° vs. 1.8 ± 1.7°, P = 0.005; 4.7 ± 3.6° vs. 3.5 ± 2.4°, P = 0.016; and 10 ± 7 mm vs. 5 ± 3 mm, P < 0.001, respectively). Segmental wedge angle and lumbar coronal balance independently distinguished DS from IS. The DS group had higher leg-pain VAS scores (6.0 ± 1.1 vs. 4.6 ± 1.6, P < 0.001), but back-pain VAS and ODI scores did not differ between groups. In patients with DS and a segmental wedge angle of 1.3° to <5.0°, lower limb pain was associated with wedge orientation and occurred mainly on the concave side. Pain distribution was not predictable from wedge orientation when the angle was <1.3° or ≥5.0°.ConclusionDS is associated with greater lumbar coronal imbalance and segmental wedging than IS. Segmental wedge angle and lumbar coronal balance may help distinguish these conditions. In DS, wedge orientation may also indicate the side of lower limb pain when the segmental wedge angle is between 1.3° and <5.0°.
Related
- Biomechanical comparative analysis of minimally invasive decompression and minimally invasive fusion with internal fixation in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a finite element study.
- Comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression for single-segment degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective comparative study involving clinical efficacy and cost analysis
- Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Total Disc Replacement with a Viscoelastic Prosthesis for Single-Level Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease in Young Adults: A Comparative Retrospective Cohort Study
- Lumbar Facet Joint Morphology and Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
- Midterm Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Transarticular Trephonic Plasty-Assisted Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study
BibTeX
@article{li2026comparative,
title = {{Comparative analysis of coronal balance with clinical correlation between degenerative and isthmic lumbar spondylolisthesis: a retrospective study}},
author = {Hengren Li and Chen Liu and Xiaodong Liu and Heng Yang and Xiaoyang Liu and Fei Jia and Fei Jia and Xingang Cui and Xingang Cui},
journal = {Frontiers in Medicine},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fmed.2026.1902310},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1902310},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Comparative analysis of coronal balance with clinical correlation between degenerative and isthmic lumbar spondylolisthesis: a retrospective study
AU - Hengren Li
AU - Chen Liu
AU - Xiaodong Liu
AU - Heng Yang
AU - Xiaoyang Liu
AU - Fei Jia
AU - Fei Jia
AU - Xingang Cui
AU - Xingang Cui
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/23
JO - Frontiers in Medicine
DO - 10.3389/fmed.2026.1902310
UR - https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1902310
AB - ObjectiveFew studies have examined the relationship between lumbar spondylolisthesis and coronal balance. This study compared coronal radiographic parameters between degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) and isthmic spondylolisthesis (IS) and investigated their associations with clinical characteristics.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 150 patients with single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis and persistent symptoms after at least 3 months of conservative treatment. Standing whole-spine anteroposterior radiographs were used to measure clavicle angle, T1 tilt, pelvic coronal tilt, segmental wedge angle, spondylolisthesis vertebral tilt angle, lateral vertebral translation, lumbar Cobb angle, lumbar coronal balance, and C7 plumb line deviation from the central sacral vertical line. Demographic, clinical, and radiographic variables were compared between groups. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors distinguishing DS from IS. A decision tree assessed whether segmental wedge angle predicted lower limb pain distribution in DS.ResultsPatients with DS were older, whereas those with IS were taller and heavier. Segmental wedge angle, spondylolisthesis vertebral tilt angle, and lumbar coronal balance were greater in the DS group than in the IS group (2.7 ± 1.9° vs. 1.8 ± 1.7°, P = 0.005; 4.7 ± 3.6° vs. 3.5 ± 2.4°, P = 0.016; and 10 ± 7 mm vs. 5 ± 3 mm, P < 0.001, respectively). Segmental wedge angle and lumbar coronal balance independently distinguished DS from IS. The DS group had higher leg-pain VAS scores (6.0 ± 1.1 vs. 4.6 ± 1.6, P < 0.001), but back-pain VAS and ODI scores did not differ between groups. In patients with DS and a segmental wedge angle of 1.3° to <5.0°, lower limb pain was associated with wedge orientation and occurred mainly on the concave side. Pain distribution was not predictable from wedge orientation when the angle was <1.3° or ≥5.0°.ConclusionDS is associated with greater lumbar coronal imbalance and segmental wedging than IS. Segmental wedge angle and lumbar coronal balance may help distinguish these conditions. In DS, wedge orientation may also indicate the side of lower limb pain when the segmental wedge angle is between 1.3° and <5.0°.
SN - 2296-858X
ER -