Nurses ethical dilemmas in responding to requests to withdraw life-sustaining treatment: A qualitative study from bioethical and Maqashid Al-Shariah perspectives
- 1Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia
Abstract
Background: Ethical dilemmas surrounding the limitation of life-sustaining treatment in patients experiencing medical futility remain complex because they involve clinical, ethical, legal, and religious considerations. Nurses frequently encounter these situations because of their close involvement with patients and families during end-of-life care.
Purpose: This study aimed to explore nurses’ ethical dilemmas in responding to the limitation of life-sustaining treatment from bioethical and maqashid al-Shari’ah perspectives.
Methods: This descriptive qualitative study used purposive sampling. Eleven participants, comprising seven nursing professionals and four religious leaders from Sumedang and Bandung, Indonesia, were recruited. Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews and analyzed using the Miles and Huberman interactive analysis model.
Results: Four major themes emerged: (1) limitations of nurses’ authority in decision-making; (2) nurses’ roles as patient advocates and communication mediators; (3) integration of bioethical principles and maqashid al-Shari’ah in treatment limitation under conditions of medical futility; and (4) transformation of nursing care toward palliative and spiritual approaches. Participants emphasized that nurses do not have independent authority to discontinue life-sustaining treatment but play essential roles in advocacy, communication, comfort care, and spiritual support. Treatment-limitation decisions were understood as multidisciplinary clinical decisions guided by bioethical principles and the concept of hifz al-nafs.
Conclusions: Ethical dilemmas related to treatment limitation in medical futility require an integrative approach combining clinical, ethical, legal, and spiritual considerations. The findings highlight the importance of collaboration among healthcare professionals, families, and religious leaders in supporting ethical, patient-centered end-of-life care.
Related
- Barriers to substance use disorder treatment among Asian Americans in New York City: A qualitative study of provider perspectives
- Young ERC Resuscitation Science Masterclass Journal Club article: “Estimating bias from withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment”
- Pre-Existing Mood Disorder is Associated with Higher Odds of Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment (WOLST) After Severe Stroke: A Retrospective Cohort Study
- A Case of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Responding to Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab after Lenvatinib Treatment
- Strategies for sustaining sexual and reproductive health services during recurrent flooding in Adamawa State, Nigeria. A qualitative study.
BibTeX
@article{zahro2026nurses,
title = {{Nurses ethical dilemmas in responding to requests to withdraw life-sustaining treatment: A qualitative study from bioethical and Maqashid Al-Shariah perspectives}},
author = {Lulu Azizah Zahro and Alyya Dwiyulianti Pratiwi and Lugita Julian Pamungkas and Nabila Komarudin and R Intania Putri Az Zahra and Tedi Supriyadi and Akhmad Faozi},
journal = {Lentera Perawat},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.52235/lp.v7i3.865},
url = {https://doi.org/10.52235/lp.v7i3.865},
note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Nurses ethical dilemmas in responding to requests to withdraw life-sustaining treatment: A qualitative study from bioethical and Maqashid Al-Shariah perspectives
AU - Lulu Azizah Zahro
AU - Alyya Dwiyulianti Pratiwi
AU - Lugita Julian Pamungkas
AU - Nabila Komarudin
AU - R Intania Putri Az Zahra
AU - Tedi Supriyadi
AU - Akhmad Faozi
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/01
JO - Lentera Perawat
DO - 10.52235/lp.v7i3.865
UR - https://doi.org/10.52235/lp.v7i3.865
AB - Background: Ethical dilemmas surrounding the limitation of life-sustaining treatment in patients experiencing medical futility remain complex because they involve clinical, ethical, legal, and religious considerations. Nurses frequently encounter these situations because of their close involvement with patients and families during end-of-life care. Purpose: This study aimed to explore nurses’ ethical dilemmas in responding to the limitation of life-sustaining treatment from bioethical and maqashid al-Shari’ah perspectives. Methods: This descriptive qualitative study used purposive sampling. Eleven participants, comprising seven nursing professionals and four religious leaders from Sumedang and Bandung, Indonesia, were recruited. Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews and analyzed using the Miles and Huberman interactive analysis model. Results: Four major themes emerged: (1) limitations of nurses’ authority in decision-making; (2) nurses’ roles as patient advocates and communication mediators; (3) integration of bioethical principles and maqashid al-Shari’ah in treatment limitation under conditions of medical futility; and (4) transformation of nursing care toward palliative and spiritual approaches. Participants emphasized that nurses do not have independent authority to discontinue life-sustaining treatment but play essential roles in advocacy, communication, comfort care, and spiritual support. Treatment-limitation decisions were understood as multidisciplinary clinical decisions guided by bioethical principles and the concept of hifz al-nafs. Conclusions: Ethical dilemmas related to treatment limitation in medical futility require an integrative approach combining clinical, ethical, legal, and spiritual considerations. The findings highlight the importance of collaboration among healthcare professionals, families, and religious leaders in supporting ethical, patient-centered end-of-life care.
SN - 2722-2837
SN - 2830-1846
ER -