Assessing the Economic Benefits of Space Weather Mitigation Investment Decisions: Evidence From Aotearoa New Zealand
- 1Geography and Geoinformation Sciences George Mason University Fairfax VA USA
- 2Transpower New Zealand Ltd Wellington New Zealand
- 3Department of Physics University of Otago Dunedin New Zealand
Abstract
Space weather events pose a growing threat to modern economies, yet their macroeconomic consequences remain underexplored. This study presents the first dedicated economic assessment of geomagnetic storm impacts on Aotearoa New Zealand, quantifying potential gross domestic product (GDP) losses across seven conservative disruption and mitigation scenarios due to an extreme coronal mass ejection (CME). The primary focus is on the damaging impacts of geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) on the electrical power transmission network. We support space weather mitigation investment decisions by providing a first‐order approximation of their potential economic benefits, using best‐in‐class scientific models, via a coupled physics‐engineering‐economic spatial modeling framework. Recognizing uncertainty in the economic interpretation of power outage impacts, we compare four different estimation methods. In the most severe unmitigated scenario, estimated GDP losses reach NZ$3.58 billion (0.98% of annual GDP). Targeted GIC‐informed scenarios still produce material losses, with no mitigation reaching up to NZ$1.48 billion (0.41% of annual GDP). Mitigation substantially reduces these impacts. Operational strategies, including optimized switching and islanding, achieve benefit‐cost ratios as high as 330 to 1, while physical protections such as GIC blocking devices produce returns up to 34.4 to 1. When also acknowledging additional unmodeled impacts, including multi‐billion losses in capital equipment and long‐term revenue, the economic rationale for pre‐emptive mitigation becomes even more pertinent.
Related
- Atmosphere mitigation in cosmic microwave background observations using multifrequency time-domain component separation
- Foreground Characterization and Mitigation in the Observations of the CD/EoR with the SKA
- LIGHTS: Limitations of far-infrared tracers for Galactic cirrus mitigation in the era of ultra-deep imaging
- Investigation and Mitigation of a Prominent Off-Axis Stray Light Path in Rubin Observatory Commissioning
- Demonstrating the Use of the Spherical Fourier Bessel Basis for Large Scale Clustering Systematics Discovery and Mitigation with eBOSS
BibTeX
@article{oughton2026assessing,
title = {{Assessing the Economic Benefits of Space Weather Mitigation Investment Decisions: Evidence From Aotearoa New Zealand}},
author = {Edward J. Oughton and Andrew Renton and Daniel H. Mac Manus and Dennies Bor and Craig J. Rodger},
journal = {Space Weather},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1029/2025sw004919},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1029/2025sw004919},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Assessing the Economic Benefits of Space Weather Mitigation Investment Decisions: Evidence From Aotearoa New Zealand
AU - Edward J. Oughton
AU - Andrew Renton
AU - Daniel H. Mac Manus
AU - Dennies Bor
AU - Craig J. Rodger
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - Space Weather
DO - 10.1029/2025sw004919
UR - https://doi.org/10.1029/2025sw004919
AB - Space weather events pose a growing threat to modern economies, yet their macroeconomic consequences remain underexplored. This study presents the first dedicated economic assessment of geomagnetic storm impacts on Aotearoa New Zealand, quantifying potential gross domestic product (GDP) losses across seven conservative disruption and mitigation scenarios due to an extreme coronal mass ejection (CME). The primary focus is on the damaging impacts of geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) on the electrical power transmission network. We support space weather mitigation investment decisions by providing a first‐order approximation of their potential economic benefits, using best‐in‐class scientific models, via a coupled physics‐engineering‐economic spatial modeling framework. Recognizing uncertainty in the economic interpretation of power outage impacts, we compare four different estimation methods. In the most severe unmitigated scenario, estimated GDP losses reach NZ$3.58 billion (0.98% of annual GDP). Targeted GIC‐informed scenarios still produce material losses, with no mitigation reaching up to NZ$1.48 billion (0.41% of annual GDP). Mitigation substantially reduces these impacts. Operational strategies, including optimized switching and islanding, achieve benefit‐cost ratios as high as 330 to 1, while physical protections such as GIC blocking devices produce returns up to 34.4 to 1. When also acknowledging additional unmodeled impacts, including multi‐billion losses in capital equipment and long‐term revenue, the economic rationale for pre‐emptive mitigation becomes even more pertinent.
SN - 1542-7390
ER -