Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,123 studies31 sourcesUpdated 54 min ago
PreprintCC BYmedRxiv

A target trial emulation study to estimate the causal effect of intravenous iron use during pregnancy and its effect on haematological and birth outcomes in Pakistan

5 more authors

Abstract

BackgroundDespite several trials on the hematological outcomes of intravenous (IV) iron in pregnancy, only few have examined its effect on birth outcomes. We estimated the causal effect of IV-iron on moderate or severe anaemia and birth outcomes.

MethodsWomen presenting to routine antenatal care in Pakistan with haemoglobin [≤]10 g/dL were eligible for treatment. We used target trial emulation (TTE) methodology to estimate the effect of IV-iron treatment within 14 days of anaemia identification, compared to no treatment, on anaemia status at follow-up. A modified TTE analysis examined birth outcomes at delivery for singleton pregnancies, including birthweight, size-for-gestational-age, and mortality. We conducted a separate TTE for each of five gestational-age periods and pooled the results of each TTE.

ResultsWe screened 3115 pregnancies of which 1715 were eligible for IV-iron; 1043 participants were treated during pregnancy. Those who received IV-iron had half the risk of moderate or severe anaemia in pregnancy compared with no treatment (pooled relative risk (RR) 0.40; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.27, 0.59). The pooled effect of IV-iron on stillbirth suggested an 83% risk reduction (95% CI 55-94%), and trends were similar for perinatal and neonatal mortality.

ConclusionIV-iron treatment improved haematological status in pregnant women and was associated with a large reduction in stillbirth. Given limited data from randomised trials regarding fetal death and treatment earlier in pregnancy, this study contributes important information to the potential benefit of IV-iron in contexts where anaemia and its sequelae are a major public health problem.

Key MessagesO_LIOur research question was to assess if intravenous (IV) iron, compared with continued prophylactic oral iron alone, improves haematological and birth outcomes for those diagnosed with moderate or severe anaemia during pregnancy. C_LIO_LIThe use of IV-iron for treatment of anemia in pregnancy during routine antenatal care settings may be more effective than continuing prophylactic dose of oral iron supplementation for improving hematological outcomes and reducing the risk of stillbirth, although there was no difference in the risk of preterm or low birth weight babies. C_LIO_LIOur study assessed the effect of treatment across the gestational age continuum, measured a comprehensive set of maternal and newborn health outcomes which were not studied in many clinical trials, and used data that reflects real world management of anemia where compliance to oral iron may be poor. C_LI

Related

  1. Opioid Analgesic Initiation During Pregnancy and the Risk of Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes: A Target Trial Emulation
    B. Varney, M. B. Gillies, K. F. Huybrechts +9
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsmedRxiv
  2. Target trial emulation of effectiveness of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination during pregnancy in four European countries
    Núria Mercadé-Besora, Berta Raventós, Nhung TH Trinh +11
    Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textInfectious diseaseCrossref
  3. Long‐Term Outcomes After Elective Splenectomy for Haematological Disease: A 27‐Year Single‐Centre Study
    Salil Dutt Barrett, Anthony Downhill, Douglas Greer +7
    Anz Journal of SurgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
  4. Multisystem Outcomes of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Versus Active Comparators in Type 2 Diabetes: A Multicenter Target Trial Emulation
    Rohit Vashisht, Sanket S. Dhruva, Ayan Patel +8
    Journal of Diabetes Science and TechnologyPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textEndocrinology & metabolismPMC
  5. Comparative Effectiveness of Individual DPP-4 Inhibitors on Kidney Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes With Moderate Cardiovascular Risk: A Target Trial Emulation
    Stacey M. Sklepinski, Jeph Herrin, Joshua J. Neumiller +10
    Diabetes, Obesity, and Cardiometabolic CAREPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textEndocrinology & metabolismPMC
BibTeX
@misc{yazdani2026target,
  title = {{A target trial emulation study to estimate the causal effect of intravenous iron use during pregnancy and its effect on haematological and birth outcomes in Pakistan}},
  author = {N. S. Yazdani and E. Oakley and A. Khan and M. F. Qazi and S. Khakwani and A. Sheikh and A. Mazhar and U. M. Iqbal and J. Marquis and B. Liaqat and K. Kumari and E. C. Caniglia and A. Hotwani and I. Nisar and F. Jehan and E. R. Smith and Z. Hoodbhoy},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.08.29.26361700},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.29.26361700v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - A target trial emulation study to estimate the causal effect of intravenous iron use during pregnancy and its effect on haematological and birth outcomes in Pakistan
AU  - N. S. Yazdani
AU  - E. Oakley
AU  - A. Khan
AU  - M. F. Qazi
AU  - S. Khakwani
AU  - A. Sheikh
AU  - A. Mazhar
AU  - U. M. Iqbal
AU  - J. Marquis
AU  - B. Liaqat
AU  - K. Kumari
AU  - E. C. Caniglia
AU  - A. Hotwani
AU  - I. Nisar
AU  - F. Jehan
AU  - E. R. Smith
AU  - Z. Hoodbhoy
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/29
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.08.29.26361700
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.29.26361700v1
AB  - BackgroundDespite several trials on the hematological outcomes of intravenous (IV) iron in pregnancy, only few have examined its effect on birth outcomes. We estimated the causal effect of IV-iron on moderate or severe anaemia and birth outcomes.  MethodsWomen presenting to routine antenatal care in Pakistan with haemoglobin [≤]10 g/dL were eligible for treatment. We used target trial emulation (TTE) methodology to estimate the effect of IV-iron treatment within 14 days of anaemia identification, compared to no treatment, on anaemia status at follow-up. A modified TTE analysis examined birth outcomes at delivery for singleton pregnancies, including birthweight, size-for-gestational-age, and mortality. We conducted a separate TTE for each of five gestational-age periods and pooled the results of each TTE.  ResultsWe screened 3115 pregnancies of which 1715 were eligible for IV-iron; 1043 participants were treated during pregnancy. Those who received IV-iron had half the risk of moderate or severe anaemia in pregnancy compared with no treatment (pooled relative risk (RR) 0.40; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.27, 0.59). The pooled effect of IV-iron on stillbirth suggested an 83% risk reduction (95% CI 55-94%), and trends were similar for perinatal and neonatal mortality.  ConclusionIV-iron treatment improved haematological status in pregnant women and was associated with a large reduction in stillbirth. Given limited data from randomised trials regarding fetal death and treatment earlier in pregnancy, this study contributes important information to the potential benefit of IV-iron in contexts where anaemia and its sequelae are a major public health problem.  Key MessagesO_LIOur research question was to assess if intravenous (IV) iron, compared with continued prophylactic oral iron alone, improves haematological and birth outcomes for those diagnosed with moderate or severe anaemia during pregnancy. C_LIO_LIThe use of IV-iron for treatment of anemia in pregnancy during routine antenatal care settings may be more effective than continuing prophylactic dose of oral iron supplementation for improving hematological outcomes and reducing the risk of stillbirth, although there was no difference in the risk of preterm or low birth weight babies. C_LIO_LIOur study assessed the effect of treatment across the gestational age continuum, measured a comprehensive set of maternal and newborn health outcomes which were not studied in many clinical trials, and used data that reflects real world management of anemia where compliance to oral iron may be poor. C_LI
ER  -