Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 48 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYEcological Indicators

Scale-sensitive river water quality indicators reveal spatially heterogeneous drivers across China

  1. 1Key Laboratory of Lake and Watershed Science for Water Security, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 211135, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  2. 2Key Laboratory of Lake and Watershed Science for Water Security, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 211135, China; Corresponding authors at: Key Laboratory of Lake and Watershed Science for Water Security, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 211135, China.

Abstract

River water quality degradation poses a critical challenge to water security, yet one-size-fits-all management approaches often overlook region-specific pollution sources and drivers, thereby constraining effective water quality improvement. To address this issue, we conducted a multi-scale analysis of river water quality drivers and management priorities under different regional contexts, using observations from 725 monitoring stations across China and a framework integrating Bayesian hierarchical modeling, machine learning, pathway analysis, and exploratory change-point analysis. Results revealed that eutrophication remained the primary constraint on nationwide water quality improvement. Total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), and permanganate index (COD Mn ) were the principal indicators of water quality degradation. Water quality exhibited marked spatial heterogeneity, with poorer conditions in northern rivers than in southern rivers. Indicator responses varied by scale and region: TN, TP, and COD Mn were best explained at riparian buffer scales, whereas the eutrophication index and water quality index were better explained at the sub-basin scale. Landscape composition dominated in both regions (41.40–43.40%), while natural factors contributed more in the north (14.05%) and socioeconomic factors in the south (17.80%). Pathway analysis suggested that riparian-scale drivers were more directly linked to pollutant indicators, whereas sub-basin conditions were more strongly associated with integrated water quality status. Exploratory change-point analysis identified distinct regional priorities, including reducing farmland dominance and atmospheric nitrogen pressure in northern China and limiting construction land expansion and population pressure in southern China. These findings support differentiated water quality management in China, while offering a transferable framework for water quality governance in other spatially heterogeneous regions.

Related

  1. Non-linear responses of ecological indicators to urban environmental drivers across Europe
    Bernardo Rocha, Paula Matos, Paolo Giordani +9
    Journal of Environmental ManagementPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full text1 citedEcologyEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  2. Interpretable machine learning reveals predictability and spatially heterogeneous factors associated with the RSEI in China
    Guoqing Chen, Chao Jian, Yanhui Zhang +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textClimate scienceCrossref
  3. Compost Quality and Application Rate as Drivers of Soil Health, Nutrient Cycling, and Crop Performance: A Critical Review and Practical Rate-Design Framework
    Bonface Ombasa Manono
    NitrogenPeer-reviewedCC BY7 citedHydrology & soilsOpenAlex
  4. Quantifying spatially varying associations between water quality and sub-basin structural characteristics: a multiscale spatial approach
    Seon Yeon Choi, Hun Kyun Bae, Chang Dae Jo +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textHydrology & soilsCrossref
  5. Spatiotemporal patterns of habitat quality and associated drivers in Anshun City, China, based on InVEST and Geodetector
    Hongyi Yang, Jiegang Liu, Shuang Li +6
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text1 citedClimate scienceDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{gu2026scalesensitive,
  title = {{Scale-sensitive river water quality indicators reveal spatially heterogeneous drivers across China}},
  author = {Yang Gu and Xiaolong Wang and Cai Li and Xijun Lai},
  journal = {Ecological Indicators},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.115494},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.115494},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Scale-sensitive river water quality indicators reveal spatially heterogeneous drivers across China
AU  - Yang Gu
AU  - Xiaolong Wang
AU  - Cai Li
AU  - Xijun Lai
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
JO  - Ecological Indicators
DO  - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.115494
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.115494
AB  - River water quality degradation poses a critical challenge to water security, yet one-size-fits-all management approaches often overlook region-specific pollution sources and drivers, thereby constraining effective water quality improvement. To address this issue, we conducted a multi-scale analysis of river water quality drivers and management priorities under different regional contexts, using observations from 725 monitoring stations across China and a framework integrating Bayesian hierarchical modeling, machine learning, pathway analysis, and exploratory change-point analysis. Results revealed that eutrophication remained the primary constraint on nationwide water quality improvement. Total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), and permanganate index (COD Mn ) were the principal indicators of water quality degradation. Water quality exhibited marked spatial heterogeneity, with poorer conditions in northern rivers than in southern rivers. Indicator responses varied by scale and region: TN, TP, and COD Mn were best explained at riparian buffer scales, whereas the eutrophication index and water quality index were better explained at the sub-basin scale. Landscape composition dominated in both regions (41.40–43.40%), while natural factors contributed more in the north (14.05%) and socioeconomic factors in the south (17.80%). Pathway analysis suggested that riparian-scale drivers were more directly linked to pollutant indicators, whereas sub-basin conditions were more strongly associated with integrated water quality status. Exploratory change-point analysis identified distinct regional priorities, including reducing farmland dominance and atmospheric nitrogen pressure in northern China and limiting construction land expansion and population pressure in southern China. These findings support differentiated water quality management in China, while offering a transferable framework for water quality governance in other spatially heterogeneous regions.
SN  - 1470-160X
SN  - 1872-7034
ER  -