Observational constraints on scalar-vector-tensor dark energy with phantom-divide crossing
Abstract
We constrain a scalar-vector-tensor (SVT) dark-energy model in which the vector sector drives the dark-energy equation of state below −1 at earlier times, while a canonical scalar field subsequently drives it across −1 toward a present-day value above −1. We confront the model with DES Year 5 supernovae, DESI DR2 baryon acoustic oscillations, and compressed cosmic microwave background information, and then include Gold-2017 redshift-space-distortion (RSD) measurements to probe structure growth. The background posterior assigns substantial weight to crossing histories and gives a better best fit than the flat Λ-cold-dark-matter (ΛCDM) model. The RSD analysis preserves this qualitative background evolution, constrains the clustering amplitude, and increases the posterior support for the directional crossing criterion. Since the growth analysis also imposes additional perturbative support conditions, this increase cannot be attributed to the RSD likelihood alone. Matched PolyChord calculations give Bayes factors larger than unity for SVT relative to ΛCDM under both prior-volume conventions considered here. The quantitative Bayes factor depends on the prior normalization assigned to the regular radiation-era branch and is larger in the RSD analysis under either convention. Overall, current expansion and structure-growth data are consistent with a stable dynamical crossing of the phantom divide in the SVT model.
Related
- Addressing the DESI DR2 phantom-crossing anomaly and enhanced H 0 tension with reconstructed scalar-tensor gravity
- Constraints on Horndeski gravity with phantom crossing
- Constraints on Horndeski gravity with phantom crossing
- Constraints on Scalar--Tensor--Vector Gravity Theory Parameters Inferred from Quasiperiodic Oscillations
- Scalar-Assisted Growth of Supermassive Black Holes: Boson-Mass Windows and Observational Constraints
BibTeX
@misc{roy2026observational,
title = {{Observational constraints on scalar-vector-tensor dark energy with phantom-divide crossing}},
author = {Nandan Roy and Shinji Tsujikawa and Ying-li Zhang and Zejun Zhang},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.31113},
eprint = {2609.31113},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31113},
note = {CC0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Observational constraints on scalar-vector-tensor dark energy with phantom-divide crossing
AU - Nandan Roy
AU - Shinji Tsujikawa
AU - Ying-li Zhang
AU - Zejun Zhang
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/25
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.31113
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31113
AB - We constrain a scalar-vector-tensor (SVT) dark-energy model in which the vector sector drives the dark-energy equation of state below −1 at earlier times, while a canonical scalar field subsequently drives it across −1 toward a present-day value above −1. We confront the model with DES Year 5 supernovae, DESI DR2 baryon acoustic oscillations, and compressed cosmic microwave background information, and then include Gold-2017 redshift-space-distortion (RSD) measurements to probe structure growth. The background posterior assigns substantial weight to crossing histories and gives a better best fit than the flat Λ-cold-dark-matter (ΛCDM) model. The RSD analysis preserves this qualitative background evolution, constrains the clustering amplitude, and increases the posterior support for the directional crossing criterion. Since the growth analysis also imposes additional perturbative support conditions, this increase cannot be attributed to the RSD likelihood alone. Matched PolyChord calculations give Bayes factors larger than unity for SVT relative to ΛCDM under both prior-volume conventions considered here. The quantitative Bayes factor depends on the prior normalization assigned to the regular radiation-era branch and is larger in the RSD analysis under either convention. Overall, current expansion and structure-growth data are consistent with a stable dynamical crossing of the phantom divide in the SVT model.
ER -