Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
PreprintCC BYmedRxiv

Sedatives reduce human gastric slow-wave amplitude, assessed by a multicenter study of endoscopic gastric mapping

  1. 1The University of Auckland

Abstract

BackgroundGastrointestinal (GI) motility disorders are prevalent, impose a significant burden, and are associated with disrupted spatial propagation of bioelectrical gastric slow waves. High-resolution endoscopic gastric mapping (EGM) is an emerging minimally invasive technique for imaging gastric electrical activity; however, EGM is performed alongside standard gastroscopy and requires procedural sedation, which may interact with gastric electrical activity, distorting clinical insights. This study explored the influence of procedural sedation on EGM-recorded slow-wave activity.

MethodsEGM was performed for [~]7 min in 32 patients undergoing upper GI endoscopy at two New Zealand hospitals. Endoscopists administered procedural sedation (fentanyl and midazolam) according to best clinical practice. The relationship between slow-wave amplitude and patient characteristics was then investigated using a variety of statistical techniques.

Key ResultsGastric slow waves were detected in 30 of 32 patients who underwent EGM. Symptom scores and demographic measures were comparable between sites. Fentanyl (A, 93.4 {+/-} 13.7 g vs B, 137.5 {+/-} 33.7 g, p[≤]0.001) and midazolam (A, 5.0 {+/-} 0.9 mg vs B, 7.4 {+/-} 1.6 mg, p[≤]0.001) doses were higher at Hospital B than Hospital A. Correspondingly, slow-wave amplitudes were lower at Hospital B than Hospital A (A, 2.33 {+/-} 1.61 mV vs B, 0.86 {+/-} 1.01 mV, p=0.004). All other slow-wave metrics were consistent between hospitals. Combined sedative dose was negatively correlated with slow-wave amplitude (p=0.037).

Conclusions & InferencesHigher procedural sedative doses are associated with lower-amplitude gastric slow-waves. Procedural sedation dose and opiate administration should be carefully considered when interpreting GI electrophysiology measurements.

Related

  1. Comparative validation and local adaptation of gastric cancer risk assessment models in a large multicenter endoscopic screening cohort in China.
    Xue Li, Ying Chen, Juan Zhu +5
    BMC medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCDOAJ
  2. Increasing Adoption Trends of Gastric Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy Over Gastric Electrical Stimulation for Refractory Gastroparesis: A Nationwide Analysis.
    Mohamed H Eldesouki, Youssef Hafez, Ahmed Ibrahim +3
    Gastro hep advancesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Completely endoscopic reversal of vertical banded gastroplasty using magnetic compression gastro-gastric anastomosis.
    Yung Lee, Salvador Navarrete, Hassan Siddiki +1
    EndoscopyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  4. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided left gastric vein embolization: a novel minimally invasive approach for gastroesophageal varices-1.
    Guilian Cheng, Jialiang Huang, Duanmin Hu
    EndoscopyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Endoscopic accessibility and conduit passage after retrosternal vs. posterior mediastinal gastric conduit reconstruction following McKeown esophagectomy: a retrospective cohort study
    Journal of thoracic diseasePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{tremain2026sedatives,
  title = {{Sedatives reduce human gastric slow-wave amplitude, assessed by a multicenter study of endoscopic gastric mapping}},
  author = {P. Tremain and J. Dowrick and C.-H. A. Chan and D. Rowbotham and G. Lim and G. O'Grady and L. K. Cheng and J. Mckeage and T. R. Angeli-Gordon},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.15.26365429},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.15.26365429v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Sedatives reduce human gastric slow-wave amplitude, assessed by a multicenter study of endoscopic gastric mapping
AU  - P. Tremain
AU  - J. Dowrick
AU  - C.-H. A. Chan
AU  - D. Rowbotham
AU  - G. Lim
AU  - G. O'Grady
AU  - L. K. Cheng
AU  - J. Mckeage
AU  - T. R. Angeli-Gordon
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/15
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.15.26365429
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.15.26365429v1
AB  - BackgroundGastrointestinal (GI) motility disorders are prevalent, impose a significant burden, and are associated with disrupted spatial propagation of bioelectrical gastric slow waves. High-resolution endoscopic gastric mapping (EGM) is an emerging minimally invasive technique for imaging gastric electrical activity; however, EGM is performed alongside standard gastroscopy and requires procedural sedation, which may interact with gastric electrical activity, distorting clinical insights. This study explored the influence of procedural sedation on EGM-recorded slow-wave activity.  MethodsEGM was performed for [~]7 min in 32 patients undergoing upper GI endoscopy at two New Zealand hospitals. Endoscopists administered procedural sedation (fentanyl and midazolam) according to best clinical practice. The relationship between slow-wave amplitude and patient characteristics was then investigated using a variety of statistical techniques.  Key ResultsGastric slow waves were detected in 30 of 32 patients who underwent EGM. Symptom scores and demographic measures were comparable between sites. Fentanyl (A, 93.4 {+/-} 13.7 g vs B, 137.5 {+/-} 33.7 g, p[≤]0.001) and midazolam (A, 5.0 {+/-} 0.9 mg vs B, 7.4 {+/-} 1.6 mg, p[≤]0.001) doses were higher at Hospital B than Hospital A. Correspondingly, slow-wave amplitudes were lower at Hospital B than Hospital A (A, 2.33 {+/-} 1.61 mV vs B, 0.86 {+/-} 1.01 mV, p=0.004). All other slow-wave metrics were consistent between hospitals. Combined sedative dose was negatively correlated with slow-wave amplitude (p=0.037).  Conclusions & InferencesHigher procedural sedative doses are associated with lower-amplitude gastric slow-waves. Procedural sedation dose and opiate administration should be carefully considered when interpreting GI electrophysiology measurements.
ER  -