Exploring how the sustainability of water and sanitation projects influences community health outcomes in Butambala District, Uganda
- 1University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa
- 2Department of Business Leadership, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa
Abstract
Purpose: This study explores how the sustainability of water and sanitation projects influences community health outcomes in rural Uganda.
Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative design was adopted, involving in-depth interviews with 18 purposively selected participants at saturation, including caregivers, LC1 chairpersons, water committee members, borehole caretakers and village health team members. Data were analysed thematically to identify patterns linking sustainability dynamics to hygiene practices and disease exposure.
Findings: Findings reveal that infrastructure breakdowns directly increase health risks, while weak leadership, limited accountability and low social trust undermine maintenance and community commitment. Coping strategies often involve health trade-offs, and environmental stress further intensifies system fragility. Strong participatory governance and community ownership were found to strengthen both sustainability and preventive health behaviours.
Practical implications: Practically, the study highlights the need for integrated governance reforms, climate-responsive planning, transparent financial management and strengthened community ownership mechanisms to safeguard health outcomes. The findings suggest that water infrastructure investments alone are insufficient without sustained institutional support and adaptive capacity building.
Originality/value: The study contributes an integrated sustainability–health perspective, demonstrating that achieving safe water and sanitation outcomes requires not only infrastructure provision but also accountable governance, social cohesion and climate-responsive management in rural contexts.
Related
- Exploring Finnish software practitioners’ views on sustainability in agile software development
- Past flow intermittence duration influences microbial and invertebrate community structure and ecological processes after flow resumption
- Non-sewered sanitation systems reshape microplastics into chemically complex and reactive contaminants
- Flooding-driven sanitation failure and enteric disease risk in urban informal settlements: Cholera as an illustrative case for climate-resilient sanitation in low- and middle-income countries
- Comparison of bin and windrow composting systems for urine-diverted fecal sludge from container-based sanitation in Haiti
BibTeX
@article{sophia2026exploring,
title = {{Exploring how the sustainability of water and sanitation projects influences community health outcomes in Butambala District, Uganda}},
author = {Namiyingo Sophia and Lunga Msengana},
journal = {International journal of health care quality assurance},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.1108/ijhcqa-02-2026-0049},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13729229},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Exploring how the sustainability of water and sanitation projects influences community health outcomes in Butambala District, Uganda
AU - Namiyingo Sophia
AU - Lunga Msengana
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/04
JO - International journal of health care quality assurance
DO - 10.1108/ijhcqa-02-2026-0049
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13729229
AB - Purpose: This study explores how the sustainability of water and sanitation projects influences community health outcomes in rural Uganda. Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative design was adopted, involving in-depth interviews with 18 purposively selected participants at saturation, including caregivers, LC1 chairpersons, water committee members, borehole caretakers and village health team members. Data were analysed thematically to identify patterns linking sustainability dynamics to hygiene practices and disease exposure. Findings: Findings reveal that infrastructure breakdowns directly increase health risks, while weak leadership, limited accountability and low social trust undermine maintenance and community commitment. Coping strategies often involve health trade-offs, and environmental stress further intensifies system fragility. Strong participatory governance and community ownership were found to strengthen both sustainability and preventive health behaviours. Practical implications: Practically, the study highlights the need for integrated governance reforms, climate-responsive planning, transparent financial management and strengthened community ownership mechanisms to safeguard health outcomes. The findings suggest that water infrastructure investments alone are insufficient without sustained institutional support and adaptive capacity building. Originality/value: The study contributes an integrated sustainability–health perspective, demonstrating that achieving safe water and sanitation outcomes requires not only infrastructure provision but also accountable governance, social cohesion and climate-responsive management in rural contexts.
SN - 0952-6862
SN - 1758-6542
ER -