Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,123 studies31 sourcesUpdated 18 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDJournal of Clinical Virology Plus

Interpretation of single target positivity among SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR result tests

Abstract

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) recently emerged and is responsible for coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19). Diagnostic tests have been developed, mainly based on reverse-transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR). Most RT-PCR assays target at least two SARS-CoV-2 genes. In some cases, only one target gene is detected; the interpretation of such cases remains unclear. Objectives: Our objective was to analyse one target positive (OPT) RT-PCR results, using two RT-PCR assays: the Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2 (Cepheid diagnosis, "Cepheid") and the Cobas® 6800 SARS-CoV-2 Test (Roche Molecular Diagnostics, "Roche"). Methods: All SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR results performed on respiratory samples with the Roche or the Cepheid tests, from 23rd March to 6th August 2020 were collected. A patient with an OPT result was classified as "probable COVID-19" if they met at least one of the three following criteria: (i) history of a two gene-positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR result, (ii) anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody (IgG) detection or (iii) compatible chest computed tomography scan (CT-scan). Results: A total of 18,630 and 1189 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests were performed with the Roche and Cepheid tests, respectively. Among the positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR, 293 samples - corresponding to 264 patients - were OPT (11% of the positive samples). Of these patients, 180 (68%) had at least one of the three criteria listed above and were classified as probable COVID-19. Conclusions: Sixty-eight percent of the patients with an OPT result were classified as probable COVID-19 and are probably at a late stage of infection. Serology and imaging can be helpful to confirm diagnosis.

Related

  1. Timing of Earliest Documented Positive Hepatitis C Laboratory Result Relative to Delivery Among Pregnant Persons With Active Infection in West Virginia, 2022–2023
    Kady Pack, Mamoon Yousaf, Rachel A. Wattick +5
    Journal of viral hepatitisPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. From Active Compound to Target Epithelium: Local Delivery, Preclinical Model Validity, and Clinical Endpoint Interpretation in Topical Therapy for HPV-Associated Lower Genital Tract Disease—A Narrative Review
    Sandra Teodora Gavril, Răzvan Popovici, Iustina Petra Solomon Condriuc +5
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCCrossref
  3. CT-Referenced Diagnostic Performance and Complementary Error Patterns of Artificial Intelligence Versus a Single Emergency Physician in Chest Radiograph Interpretation: A Retrospective Paired Diagnostic Accuracy Study
    Ömer Damar, Mahmut Yaman
    TomographyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMedical imaging & radiologyEurope PMC
  4. False Positives in Esophageal pH Monitoring: The Pitfalls of Single-Value Interpretation
    Kyle Nguyen-Ngo, Kumael Jafri, Vinit H. Majmudar +4
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Mycoplasma pneumoniae PCR positivity rate among children in Chengdu, China: a retrospective cross-sectional epidemiological study
    Zhiyong Liao, Xiaomei Zou, Jing Liang +6
    Frontiers in pediatricsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{fenaux2026interpretation,
  title = {{Interpretation of single target positivity among SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR result tests}},
  author = {Honorine Fenaux and Théo Ghelfenstein-Ferreira and Maud Salmona and Nadia Mahjoub and Linda Feghoul and Sarah Maylin and Marie-Laure Chaix and Marine Minier and Audrey Gabassi and Jérôme Le Goff and Constance Delaugerre},
  journal = {Journal of Clinical Virology Plus},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1016/j.jcvp.2021.100021},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05783324v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Interpretation of single target positivity among SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR result tests
AU  - Honorine Fenaux
AU  - Théo Ghelfenstein-Ferreira
AU  - Maud Salmona
AU  - Nadia Mahjoub
AU  - Linda Feghoul
AU  - Sarah Maylin
AU  - Marie-Laure Chaix
AU  - Marine Minier
AU  - Audrey Gabassi
AU  - Jérôme Le Goff
AU  - Constance Delaugerre
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/07
JO  - Journal of Clinical Virology Plus
DO  - 10.1016/j.jcvp.2021.100021
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05783324v1
AB  - Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) recently emerged and is responsible for coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19). Diagnostic tests have been developed, mainly based on reverse-transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR). Most RT-PCR assays target at least two SARS-CoV-2 genes. In some cases, only one target gene is detected; the interpretation of such cases remains unclear. Objectives: Our objective was to analyse one target positive (OPT) RT-PCR results, using two RT-PCR assays: the Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2 (Cepheid diagnosis, "Cepheid") and the Cobas® 6800 SARS-CoV-2 Test (Roche Molecular Diagnostics, "Roche"). Methods: All SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR results performed on respiratory samples with the Roche or the Cepheid tests, from 23rd March to 6th August 2020 were collected. A patient with an OPT result was classified as "probable COVID-19" if they met at least one of the three following criteria: (i) history of a two gene-positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR result, (ii) anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody (IgG) detection or (iii) compatible chest computed tomography scan (CT-scan). Results: A total of 18,630 and 1189 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests were performed with the Roche and Cepheid tests, respectively. Among the positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR, 293 samples - corresponding to 264 patients - were OPT (11% of the positive samples). Of these patients, 180 (68%) had at least one of the three criteria listed above and were classified as probable COVID-19. Conclusions: Sixty-eight percent of the patients with an OPT result were classified as probable COVID-19 and are probably at a late stage of infection. Serology and imaging can be helpful to confirm diagnosis.
SN  - 2667-0380
SN  - 2667-0380
ER  -