Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 24 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Batteries

SCARO: Scenario-Conditioned Risk Optimization for Day-Ahead Battery Energy Storage Scheduling

  1. 1School of Computer and Information Management, Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics, Hohhot 010070, China
  2. 2School of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China

Abstract

Day-ahead battery arbitrage requires assessing the return and downside risk of complete charge–discharge cycles. We propose Scenario-Conditioned Risk Optimization (SCARO), which corrects supply and demand forecasts and maps jointly resampled whole-day residuals to price paths. An exact planner identifies adverse outcomes separately for each feasible schedule and combines mean and lower-tail profit to select an operating cycle or no operation. A 182-day rolling evaluation in the Western Inner Mongolia real-time electricity market compares SCARO with 21 baselines for a battery with zero initial and terminal states of charge and at most one daily cycle. The configurations use a single price model (SCARO-S) or ensembles (SCARO-E and SCARO-L), with the ensemble configurations differing in boundary correction. SCARO-S achieves the highest mean profit in 13 of 16 efficiency–cost conditions. At nominal efficiency and zero cycle cost, its mean and worst-month profits exceed the strongest baseline for each metric by 4.72% and 8.76%, respectively; SCARO-L achieves the highest oracle capture. With forecasts held fixed, lower-tail scheduling improves mean profit and loss frequency for SCARO-E and SCARO-L relative to their risk-neutral controls.

Related

  1. Economic Optimization of Battery Storage for Power Ramp- Rate Control and Energy Arbitrage in PV and Wind Power Systems
    Rodolfo Dufo-López, Juan M. Lujano-Rojas, José L. Bernal-Agustín
    BatteriesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Electrochemistry & energyCrossref
  2. Sequence-Conditioned Physics-Informed Neural Network for Lithium-Ion Battery State of Health Estimation Using Charging Segments at High State of Charge
    Pengxiang Wang, Tao Wang, Xiaodong Xu +5
    BatteriesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.01 citedElectrochemistry & energyCrossref
  3. Prussian blue@tetracyanoquinodimethane as a high-rate sodium-ion battery cathode with multiple sodium-storage sites
    Fuhua Zhang, Yiwei Zhao, Yongzheng Zheng +3
    RSC advancesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral chemistryEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
  4. Asymmetric Zinc-Nitrate/Hydrogen Battery Chemistry Coupling Electrochemical Hydrogen Charge and Energy Storage.
    Zhijie Yan, Xinrong Chen, Chunpeng Yang
    JACS AuPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral chemistryEurope PMCPMC
  5. Rapid One-Step Synthesis of Sodium-Ion Battery Cathodes from Desalination Waste: A Sustainable Approach to High-Performance Energy Storage
    Noa Capistrant, Alfred Chen, Michael Guo
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BYFull textGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
BibTeX
@article{li2026scaro,
  title = {{SCARO: Scenario-Conditioned Risk Optimization for Day-Ahead Battery Energy Storage Scheduling}},
  author = {Jinchen Li and Xingxing Wang},
  journal = {Batteries},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/batteries12100404},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2313-0105/12/10/404},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - SCARO: Scenario-Conditioned Risk Optimization for Day-Ahead Battery Energy Storage Scheduling
AU  - Jinchen Li
AU  - Xingxing Wang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/07
JO  - Batteries
DO  - 10.3390/batteries12100404
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2313-0105/12/10/404
AB  - Day-ahead battery arbitrage requires assessing the return and downside risk of complete charge–discharge cycles. We propose Scenario-Conditioned Risk Optimization (SCARO), which corrects supply and demand forecasts and maps jointly resampled whole-day residuals to price paths. An exact planner identifies adverse outcomes separately for each feasible schedule and combines mean and lower-tail profit to select an operating cycle or no operation. A 182-day rolling evaluation in the Western Inner Mongolia real-time electricity market compares SCARO with 21 baselines for a battery with zero initial and terminal states of charge and at most one daily cycle. The configurations use a single price model (SCARO-S) or ensembles (SCARO-E and SCARO-L), with the ensemble configurations differing in boundary correction. SCARO-S achieves the highest mean profit in 13 of 16 efficiency–cost conditions. At nominal efficiency and zero cycle cost, its mean and worst-month profits exceed the strongest baseline for each metric by 4.72% and 8.76%, respectively; SCARO-L achieves the highest oracle capture. With forecasts held fixed, lower-tail scheduling improves mean profit and loss frequency for SCARO-E and SCARO-L relative to their risk-neutral controls.
SN  - 2313-0105
ER  -