Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,161 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDJACS Au

Smarter Data: Rethinking Data Generation for Machine Learning Potentials in Heterogeneous Catalysis

4 affiliations
  1. 1School of Physical Science and Technology
  2. 2ShanghaiTech University
  3. 3Queen’s University Belfast
  4. 4School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering

Abstract

Machine-learning potentials (MLPs) promise near-first-principles fidelity at scales relevant to heterogeneous catalysis, yet the key determinant of their reliability remains the quality of the training data. A paramount challenge lies in constructing training sets that capture both the system-specific structural domains and the broader chemical variability arising from the complex, dynamic nature of heterogeneous catalytic systems. In this perspective, we argue that the key question is no longer simply how to generate more data, but how to generate the right data. We reinterpret the main strategies used to construct MLP training sets for heterogeneous catalysis through the lens of scope, relevance, and coverage. We then examine the challenges of data generation in catalytic systems and how they have shaped prevailing structure-based sampling practices, which encode system relevance and targeted coverage directly into the data set. We also discuss emerging interaction-based sampling strategies that aim to broaden local-interaction support beyond narrowly predefined systems. We conclude by consolidating a possible hybrid data generation workflow that combines the strengths of both approaches, thereby bringing MLPs closer to the simulation of complex heterogeneous catalytic systems.

Related

  1. How accurate are foundational machine learning interatomic potentials for heterogeneous catalysis?
    Luuk H. E. Kempen, Raffaele Cheula, Mie Andersen
    The Journal of Chemical PhysicsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text9 citedMaterials & polymersOpenAlex
  2. Simulating enzyme catalysis with electrostatically embedded machine learning potentials
    Valentin Gradisteanu, Elliot W Chan, Lester Hedges +7
    Chemical SciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text15 citedMaterials & polymersHAL
  3. Fine-tuning universal machine learning potentials for transition state search in surface catalysis
    Raffaele Cheula, Mie Andersen, John R. Kitchin
    npj Computational MaterialsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull text7 citedMaterials & polymersOpenAlex
  4. Active Atom Identification for Information-Dense Training of Machine-Learning Potentials in Catalysis
    Haobo Zhao, Xiongwei Tian, Jixuan Lin +5
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textMaterials & polymersChemRxiv
  5. Electrical Double Layers Shape the Kinetics of Heterogeneous Thermochemical Catalysis
    Mo YAN, Yufan Zhang
    ChemRxivPreprintLicence not statedGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
BibTeX
@article{xie2026smarter,
  title = {{Smarter Data: Rethinking Data Generation for Machine Learning Potentials in Heterogeneous Catalysis}},
  author = {Wenbo Xie and Yixiao Han and Chenyu Wu and P. Hu},
  journal = {JACS Au},
  year = {2026},
  month = may,
  doi = {10.1021/jacsau.6c00100},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.6c00100},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Smarter Data: Rethinking Data Generation for Machine Learning Potentials in Heterogeneous Catalysis
AU  - Wenbo Xie
AU  - Yixiao Han
AU  - Chenyu Wu
AU  - P. Hu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/05/27
JO  - JACS Au
DO  - 10.1021/jacsau.6c00100
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.6c00100
AB  - Machine-learning potentials (MLPs) promise near-first-principles fidelity at scales relevant to heterogeneous catalysis, yet the key determinant of their reliability remains the quality of the training data. A paramount challenge lies in constructing training sets that capture both the system-specific structural domains and the broader chemical variability arising from the complex, dynamic nature of heterogeneous catalytic systems. In this perspective, we argue that the key question is no longer simply how to generate more data, but how to generate the right data. We reinterpret the main strategies used to construct MLP training sets for heterogeneous catalysis through the lens of scope, relevance, and coverage. We then examine the challenges of data generation in catalytic systems and how they have shaped prevailing structure-based sampling practices, which encode system relevance and targeted coverage directly into the data set. We also discuss emerging interaction-based sampling strategies that aim to broaden local-interaction support beyond narrowly predefined systems. We conclude by consolidating a possible hybrid data generation workflow that combines the strengths of both approaches, thereby bringing MLPs closer to the simulation of complex heterogeneous catalytic systems.
SN  - 2691-3704
ER  -