Characterizing drinking-water facility exposure to historical wildfires in Northern Colorado
4 affiliations
- 1USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station
- 2USDA Forest Service
- 3Duke University Nicholas School of the Environment
- 4USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station
Abstract
Wildfire increasingly threatens forested headwater watersheds that supply drinking water to downstream communities, yet wildfire exposure is often characterized at regional scales that do not identify which historical fires are most impactful to specific intake facilities. This limitation is especially important in managed water systems where inter-basin transfers (IBTs) expand source-water footprints beyond natural watershed boundaries. Here, we developed a reproducible spatial framework to quantify historical wildfire exposure for drinking-water intakes and applied it in northern Colorado as a case study. The analysis integrated historical (1984–2024) wildfire perimeters, burn severity, subwatershed boundaries, natural hydrologic flow paths, and IBT connectivity. Across the 7,308 km² study area, 1,895 km² burned (25.9% of the landscape), at least one fire occurred in 54 of 90 watershed, and approximately 31% of total burned area was classified as high severity. Across all fire events with downstream intake relevance, fires affected drinking-water systems serving an average of 344,854 people and 4 downstream intake facilities per event. Intake-level exposure depended not only on fire size, but also on burn severity and hydrologic connectivity. Incorporating IBTs expanded the effective source-water footprint and altered the relative importance of individual subwatersheds for evaluating fire impacts on downstream intake systems. These findings improve wildfire characterization in source-water exposure assessment and support development of decision-support tools (e.g., Forests to Faucets) linking forests, water, and communities.
Related
- Chronic Exposure to SSRI n Drinking Water: Public Health Implications under Water scarcity scenarios
- Predicting global scale exposure of humans to PCB 153 from historical emissions
- Characterizing human exposure to traffic-related air pollution through daily activities using an agent-based framework
- A South Atlantic atmospheric river dipole as a key precursor of Amazon wildfires
- Wildfires diminish vegetation control on surface runoff
BibTeX
@article{mosher2026characterizing,
title = {{Characterizing drinking-water facility exposure to historical wildfires in Northern Colorado}},
author = {Danika Leigh Mosher and Ge Sun and Peter V. Caldwell and Yulong Zhang and Stephen D. Sebestyen},
journal = {Environmental Research Letters},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1088/1748-9326/aebb4c},
url = {https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aebb4c},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Characterizing drinking-water facility exposure to historical wildfires in Northern Colorado
AU - Danika Leigh Mosher
AU - Ge Sun
AU - Peter V. Caldwell
AU - Yulong Zhang
AU - Stephen D. Sebestyen
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/29
JO - Environmental Research Letters
DO - 10.1088/1748-9326/aebb4c
UR - https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aebb4c
AB - Wildfire increasingly threatens forested headwater watersheds that supply drinking water to downstream communities, yet wildfire exposure is often characterized at regional scales that do not identify which historical fires are most impactful to specific intake facilities. This limitation is especially important in managed water systems where inter-basin transfers (IBTs) expand source-water footprints beyond natural watershed boundaries. Here, we developed a reproducible spatial framework to quantify historical wildfire exposure for drinking-water intakes and applied it in northern Colorado as a case study. The analysis integrated historical (1984–2024) wildfire perimeters, burn severity, subwatershed boundaries, natural hydrologic flow paths, and IBT connectivity. Across the 7,308 km² study area, 1,895 km² burned (25.9% of the landscape), at least one fire occurred in 54 of 90 watershed, and approximately 31% of total burned area was classified as high severity. Across all fire events with downstream intake relevance, fires affected drinking-water systems serving an average of 344,854 people and 4 downstream intake facilities per event. Intake-level exposure depended not only on fire size, but also on burn severity and hydrologic connectivity. Incorporating IBTs expanded the effective source-water footprint and altered the relative importance of individual subwatersheds for evaluating fire impacts on downstream intake systems. These findings improve wildfire characterization in source-water exposure assessment and support development of decision-support tools (e.g., Forests to Faucets) linking forests, water, and communities.
SN - 1748-9326
ER -