Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 51 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYCancers

Dosimetric Feasibility of Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy with Simultaneously Integrated Central Boost for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.

  1. 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
  2. 2Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
  3. 3Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

Abstract

Background: Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare malignancies that pose challenges due to their large size and proximity to organs-at-risk (OARs). Compared to conventional 5-week radiation therapy (RT), hypofractionated RT (HFRT) offers a shorter alternative with potential biologic benefit, and simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) can increase delivered dose. We evaluated the dosimetric feasibility of HFRT with a central tumor SIB for bulky RPS. Methods: Fifteen patients with RPS previously treated with preoperative conventionally fractionated RT were replanned using HFRT with a central SIB. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were created to deliver 42.75 Gy in 15 fractions to the planning target volume (PTV), 45 Gy to the internal gross tumor volume (iGTV), and 52.5 Gy to the SIB volume (1 cm contraction of iGTV). OAR planning objectives were prioritized during optimization. Dosimetric plan-generation feasibility was defined as generation of a treatment plan meeting prespecified target-coverage criteria; compliance with each OAR objective was assessed separately. Results: Mean tumor size was 18.3 cm (range 5.8-28.2 cm), with mean volumes for iGTV, SIB, and PTV of 1633.8 cc, 926.9 cc, and 3323.2 cc, respectively. All plans met the prespecified target coverage criteria for iGTV, SIB, and PTV. Ten of 15 plans met all target-coverage criteria and all prespecified OAR objectives; five met the target coverage criteria and non-bowel OAR objectives but exceeded at least one bowel objective by <1% of the specified constraint. All non-bowel OAR objectives were met except that the bilateral kidney objective was exceeded in 4 of 11 evaluable patients. The average homogeneity index for the iGTV and SIB were 0.21 (range 0.18-0.25) and 0.05 (range 0.04-0.06), respectively. The PTV 95% conformality index was 0.99 (range 0.97-1.0), indicating excellent target conformation with minimal normal tissue spillage. Conclusions: These findings support the dosimetric feasibility of generating hypofractionated radiation therapy plans with a central SIB for large retroperitoneal sarcomas. However, one-third of plans exceeded at least one bowel objective, and these planning results do not establish clinical deliverability, safety, or efficacy.

Related

  1. Hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for synchronous bilateral breast cancer: clinical and dosimetric outcomes
    Bahar Cepni, Line Hoeltgen, David Neugebauer +11
    Strahlentherapie Und OnkologiePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textApplied physics & instrumentationPMC
  2. Feasibility of Urethra-Sparing Ultra-Hypofractionated Three-Dose-Level Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer with a Dominant Intraprostatic Lesion Abutting the High-Dose Avoidance Zone.
    Annalisa Muscato, Denis La Fauci, Anna Viola +2
    Precision radiation oncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textApplied physics & instrumentationEurope PMC
  3. Dosimetric feasibility of lattice radiotherapy for bulky tumors: a paired VMAT vs. helical tomotherapy comparison - the STRYKE trial
    Mottareale R, Serra M, Pezzulla D +18
    Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textApplied physics & instrumentationCrossref
  4. Simultaneously achieving Heisenberg- and Landau-limited precision in equilibrium quantum thermometry
    Jingyi Fan, Shengshi Pang
    npj Quantum InformationPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationCrossref
  5. Six-Fraction Ultra-Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Tumours Adjacent to or Involving the Brachial Plexus: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Maximilian Sturz, Gabriela Studer, Christoph Glanzmann +3
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textApplied physics & instrumentationEurope PMCCrossref
BibTeX
@article{cosner2026dosimetric,
  title = {{Dosimetric Feasibility of Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy with Simultaneously Integrated Central Boost for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.}},
  author = {Zoe L Cosner and Katie Lee and Yaguang Pei and Kevin X Liu and Elizabeth H Baldini and Miranda B Lam},
  journal = {Cancers},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.3390/cancers18193114},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42882809},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Dosimetric Feasibility of Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy with Simultaneously Integrated Central Boost for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.
AU  - Zoe L Cosner
AU  - Katie Lee
AU  - Yaguang Pei
AU  - Kevin X Liu
AU  - Elizabeth H Baldini
AU  - Miranda B Lam
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/25
JO  - Cancers
DO  - 10.3390/cancers18193114
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42882809
AB  - Background: Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare malignancies that pose challenges due to their large size and proximity to organs-at-risk (OARs). Compared to conventional 5-week radiation therapy (RT), hypofractionated RT (HFRT) offers a shorter alternative with potential biologic benefit, and simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) can increase delivered dose. We evaluated the dosimetric feasibility of HFRT with a central tumor SIB for bulky RPS. Methods: Fifteen patients with RPS previously treated with preoperative conventionally fractionated RT were replanned using HFRT with a central SIB. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were created to deliver 42.75 Gy in 15 fractions to the planning target volume (PTV), 45 Gy to the internal gross tumor volume (iGTV), and 52.5 Gy to the SIB volume (1 cm contraction of iGTV). OAR planning objectives were prioritized during optimization. Dosimetric plan-generation feasibility was defined as generation of a treatment plan meeting prespecified target-coverage criteria; compliance with each OAR objective was assessed separately. Results: Mean tumor size was 18.3 cm (range 5.8-28.2 cm), with mean volumes for iGTV, SIB, and PTV of 1633.8 cc, 926.9 cc, and 3323.2 cc, respectively. All plans met the prespecified target coverage criteria for iGTV, SIB, and PTV. Ten of 15 plans met all target-coverage criteria and all prespecified OAR objectives; five met the target coverage criteria and non-bowel OAR objectives but exceeded at least one bowel objective by <1% of the specified constraint. All non-bowel OAR objectives were met except that the bilateral kidney objective was exceeded in 4 of 11 evaluable patients. The average homogeneity index for the iGTV and SIB were 0.21 (range 0.18-0.25) and 0.05 (range 0.04-0.06), respectively. The PTV 95% conformality index was 0.99 (range 0.97-1.0), indicating excellent target conformation with minimal normal tissue spillage. Conclusions: These findings support the dosimetric feasibility of generating hypofractionated radiation therapy plans with a central SIB for large retroperitoneal sarcomas. However, one-third of plans exceeded at least one bowel objective, and these planning results do not establish clinical deliverability, safety, or efficacy.
SN  - 2072-6694
ER  -