Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,860 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Direct Inference on Admissible Sets (Diona)

Abstract

We propose a new regression method named Direct Inference on Admissible Sets (Diona) that directly uses samples to estimate the state and its derivatives at a query point, along with their admissible bounds, without long global training. By casting the values and derivatives at the query and neighbouring samples as latent variables in a constrained optimisation problem, the burden of long training loops becomes one of on-demand local solves. We establish Diona's theoretical properties including finite-sample coverage and, in the noiseless case, convergence to the true state and derivatives under dense sampling. In a nonlinear regression benchmark on six functions of three to eight dimensions, Diona was more accurate than a Gaussian process (GP) on noiseless data especially with denser data sets. Furthermore, as with GP, it produced uncertainty bounds that contained the true value at more than 95% of query points in four functions. Diona's time to a first prediction after a data set update was three to four orders of magnitude shorter than that of the GP, and two to three orders shorter than that of a neural network, which was more accurate but offers no uncertainty quantification. This low latency is paid for by on-demand predictions, so this latency advantage applies when relatively few predictions are needed between data updates.

Related

  1. Counting Residue-Class Survivor Sets: An Asymptotic Comparison with Prime-Admissible Sets
    Mario Raso, Daniele Venturi
    arXivPreprintCC BY-SA 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  2. Counting Admissible Sets of Integers: A Proof of the Erdős--Nicolas--Sárközy Conjecture
    Guoqing Wang, Wenkai Yang
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  3. Admissible sets of integers in imaginary quadratic fields of class number 1
    Daniel Shiu
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  4. Inference for Fréchet Mean Sets
    Ryunosuke Miyazaki
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Parametric inference for the average hazard approach in time-to-event analysis with sparse risk sets
    Zihan Qian, Lu Tian, Hajime Uno
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{jr2026direct,
  title = {{Direct Inference on Admissible Sets (Diona)}},
  author = {Lorenzo Sabug Jr. and Eric Kerrigan},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.31526},
  eprint = {2610.31526},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31526},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Direct Inference on Admissible Sets (Diona)
AU  - Lorenzo Sabug Jr.
AU  - Eric Kerrigan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/22
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.31526
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31526
AB  - We propose a new regression method named Direct Inference on Admissible Sets (Diona) that directly uses samples to estimate the state and its derivatives at a query point, along with their admissible bounds, without long global training. By casting the values and derivatives at the query and neighbouring samples as latent variables in a constrained optimisation problem, the burden of long training loops becomes one of on-demand local solves. We establish Diona's theoretical properties including finite-sample coverage and, in the noiseless case, convergence to the true state and derivatives under dense sampling. In a nonlinear regression benchmark on six functions of three to eight dimensions, Diona was more accurate than a Gaussian process (GP) on noiseless data especially with denser data sets. Furthermore, as with GP, it produced uncertainty bounds that contained the true value at more than 95% of query points in four functions. Diona's time to a first prediction after a data set update was three to four orders of magnitude shorter than that of the GP, and two to three orders shorter than that of a neural network, which was more accurate but offers no uncertainty quantification. This low latency is paid for by on-demand predictions, so this latency advantage applies when relatively few predictions are needed between data updates.
ER  -