Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
179,152 studies31 sourcesUpdated 40 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYSustainable Environment Research

Rectifying agricultural waste in Thailand: unveiling the economic impact of transitioning from open burning to sustainable practices

  • Onicha Meangbua1
  • Yingluck Kanchanaroek1
  • Pidok Kako2
  • Totsanat Rattanakaew3
  1. 1College of Interdisciplinary Studies, Thammasat University
  2. 2Provincial Electricity Authority
  3. 3Land Development Department
Read full textDOICite

Abstract

Thailand generates approximately 114 Mt of agricultural waste annually from rice, maize, and sugarcane fields, with open burning contributing to severe economic, health, and environmental crises. This study assesses the transition from open burning to sustainable residue management—ploughing, composting, and biomass energy generation—through cost–benefit analysis and Life Cycle Assessment of greenhouse gas emissions. Data were collected using Geographic Information System, surveys, focus groups, and interviews. The findings indicate that all alternatives are economically viable, with composting yielding the biggest profitability for rice (Net Present Value (NPV) = 250,607 million Baht (1 Baht approx. = 0.03 USD), Benefit–Cost Ratio (BCR) = 5.22) and maize (NPV = 192,964 million Baht, BCR = 3.34). In comparison, biomass energy is the most cost-effective option for sugarcane (NPV = 681,936 million Baht, BCR = 4.18). To mitigate agricultural burning and pollution, policies should promote organic fertilizer production and provide sustained financial support for small-scale farmers, facilitating a large-scale transition toward sustainable waste management.

Related

  1. Editorial for the Second EJP SOIL Special Issue: “Climate‐Smart Sustainable Agricultural Soil Management for the Future II”
    Sophie Zechmeister-Boltenstern, Katharina Meurer, Klaus Jarosch +4
    European Journal of Soil SciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biologyEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  2. Sharing LCA results with field stakeholders to inform choices of agricultural practices: case study on active spring frost protection practices in viticulture
    Vincent Baillet, Angèle Mace, Christel Renaud-Gentie
    Innovations AgronomiquesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  3. Volatile organic compound emissions in croplands: The contributions of crops, soil, and agricultural management practices
    Yang Liu, Raluca Ciuraru, Letizia Abis +9
    Agriculture Ecosystems & EnvironmentPeer-reviewedCC BY7 citedAtmospheric science & meteorologyOpenAlex
  4. An in-situ characterization of Triticum aestivum sheds light on the role of wheat genotype and agricultural practices on the below-ground microbiota
    Claudia Bartoli, Enguerrand Burel, Sébastien Carrère +2
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral biologyEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  5. Soil microbial responses to long-term agricultural practices under no-till: insights from depth-resolved sampling of shallow soil layers.
    Melina Soledad Piacenza, Silvina Bacigaluppo, Mariana Maury +4
    FEMS microbiology ecologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textHydrology & soilsEurope PMC

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@article{meangbua2026rectifying,
  title = {{Rectifying agricultural waste in Thailand: unveiling the economic impact of transitioning from open burning to sustainable practices}},
  author = {Onicha Meangbua and Yingluck Kanchanaroek and Pidok Kako and Totsanat Rattanakaew},
  journal = {Sustainable Environment Research},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1186/s42834-026-00295-z},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s42834-026-00295-z},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Rectifying agricultural waste in Thailand: unveiling the economic impact of transitioning from open burning to sustainable practices
AU  - Onicha Meangbua
AU  - Yingluck Kanchanaroek
AU  - Pidok Kako
AU  - Totsanat Rattanakaew
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - Sustainable Environment Research
DO  - 10.1186/s42834-026-00295-z
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s42834-026-00295-z
AB  - Thailand generates approximately 114 Mt of agricultural waste annually from rice, maize, and sugarcane fields, with open burning contributing to severe economic, health, and environmental crises. This study assesses the transition from open burning to sustainable residue management—ploughing, composting, and biomass energy generation—through cost–benefit analysis and Life Cycle Assessment of greenhouse gas emissions. Data were collected using Geographic Information System, surveys, focus groups, and interviews. The findings indicate that all alternatives are economically viable, with composting yielding the biggest profitability for rice (Net Present Value (NPV) = 250,607 million Baht (1 Baht approx. = 0.03 USD), Benefit–Cost Ratio (BCR) = 5.22) and maize (NPV = 192,964 million Baht, BCR = 3.34). In comparison, biomass energy is the most cost-effective option for sugarcane (NPV = 681,936 million Baht, BCR = 4.18). To mitigate agricultural burning and pollution, policies should promote organic fertilizer production and provide sustained financial support for small-scale farmers, facilitating a large-scale transition toward sustainable waste management.
SN  - 2468-2039
ER  -