Methane as a surrogate for krypton for adsorption capacity evaluation
Abstract
Krypton is scarce, costly, and periodically experiences supply shortages, motivating the search for alternative probe molecules. Methane, which shares many physicochemical properties with krypton—such as kinetic diameter, polarizability, boiling point, and a lack of quadrupole moment—presents itself as a promising and more accessible surrogate. This study addresses whether methane can be used as a substitute for krypton for adsorption studies. Here, we demonstrate that across several representative adsorbents—including activated carbon, a zeolite, and flexible as well as rigid metal-organic frameworks—the adsorption-desorption isotherms of methane and krypton are remarkably similar in both shape and magnitude over a wide range of conditions. Comparative analysis reveals that differences in maximum adsorption capacities and affinity parameters between methane and krypton are minor, generally within experimental uncertainty, and that the qualitative adsorption mechanisms—including phase transitions in flexible MOFs—are consistently captured by both probes. To the best of our knowledge at the exception of H 2 isotopes, we show for the first time that same adsorption capacity data can be obtained with two different adsorbates.
Related
- Alterations in Coal Permeability and Adsorption Capacity Post Oxidation Treatment: Insights into Enhancing Coalbed Methane Production
- Pore Structure, Fractal Dimension, and Methane Adsorption Capacity of Coals: A Case Study from the Huaibei Coalfield, China
- Physicochemical Controls on Methane Adsorption Capacity of Coal Seams Beneath Red Beds: Roles of Pore Structure and Surface Chemistry
- Methane and ethane adsorption on calcite surfaces: effects of surface morphology from molecular dynamics and 3D-RISM
- Assessment of CO₂ adsorption capacity in Wollastonite using atomistic simulation
BibTeX
@article{grimaud2026methane,
title = {{Methane as a surrogate for krypton for adsorption capacity evaluation}},
author = {C. Grimaud and B. Coasne and A. Mesbah and D. Farrusseng and C. Daniel},
journal = {Adsorption - Journal of the International Adsorption Society},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1007/s10450-026-00699-8},
url = {https://hal.science/hal-05838783v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Methane as a surrogate for krypton for adsorption capacity evaluation
AU - C. Grimaud
AU - B. Coasne
AU - A. Mesbah
AU - D. Farrusseng
AU - C. Daniel
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/26
JO - Adsorption - Journal of the International Adsorption Society
DO - 10.1007/s10450-026-00699-8
UR - https://hal.science/hal-05838783v1
AB - Krypton is scarce, costly, and periodically experiences supply shortages, motivating the search for alternative probe molecules. Methane, which shares many physicochemical properties with krypton—such as kinetic diameter, polarizability, boiling point, and a lack of quadrupole moment—presents itself as a promising and more accessible surrogate. This study addresses whether methane can be used as a substitute for krypton for adsorption studies. Here, we demonstrate that across several representative adsorbents—including activated carbon, a zeolite, and flexible as well as rigid metal-organic frameworks—the adsorption-desorption isotherms of methane and krypton are remarkably similar in both shape and magnitude over a wide range of conditions. Comparative analysis reveals that differences in maximum adsorption capacities and affinity parameters between methane and krypton are minor, generally within experimental uncertainty, and that the qualitative adsorption mechanisms—including phase transitions in flexible MOFs—are consistently captured by both probes. To the best of our knowledge at the exception of H 2 isotopes, we show for the first time that same adsorption capacity data can be obtained with two different adsorbates.
SN - 0929-5607
SN - 1572-8757
ER -