Nutrition and Depression: A Narrative Review of Biological Mechanisms and Evidence from Observational Studies and Clinical Trials
- 1Department of Food and Nutrition, College of Science and Convergence Technology, Seoul Women’s University, Seoul 01797, Republic of Korea
- 2Major in Food and Nutrition, School of Bio-Health Convergence, Sungshin Women’s University, Seoul 01133, Republic of Korea
Abstract
Depression is one of the most prevalent and disabling psychiatric disorders worldwide and has a heterogeneous pathophysiology involving interacting neurobiological, neuroimmune, and metabolic processes. Alterations in neurotransmission, neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, gut–brain communication, hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis dysregulation, and immunometabolic homeostasis may provide biological links between nutrition and depression. This narrative review examines current evidence linking nutrition and depression across mechanistic, observational, and clinical levels. Regarding dietary patterns, observational evidence generally associates greater adherence to the Mediterranean diet with more favorable depression-related outcomes, while evidence for the DASH diet remains more limited. In contrast, Western dietary patterns and greater consumption of ultra-processed foods are associated with higher risks of depression-related outcomes. Individual nutrients, including omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, vitamin D, vitamin C, folate, vitamin B12, vitamin B6, and essential minerals, have also been investigated in relation to depression, but findings from supplementation studies vary across nutrients, study populations, and baseline nutritional status. However, much of the evidence linking nutritional factors with depression is observational and does not establish causality. Clinical trials of nutrient supplementation and dietary interventions have reported potential benefits in some populations, but findings remain heterogeneous, and large prevention trials have also reported null results. Differences in baseline nutritional status, depression phenotype, and metabolic and inflammatory profiles may partly contribute to this heterogeneity. Future well-designed clinical trials, together with advances in multi-omics and precision approaches, may help identify individuals most likely to benefit from targeted nutritional strategies.
Related
- Ultra-Processed Foods in Early Life: Biological Mechanisms, Developmental Programming and Childhood Obesity—A Narrative Review
- Rhythmic dance interventions and dance/movement therapy for depression and anxiety: a structured narrative review of clinical evidence, candidate mechanisms, and implementation considerations
- Apical Periodontitis and Blood–Brain Barrier Compromise: Biological Mechanisms and Current Evidence—A Narrative Review
- Magnesium in Skin Aging, Wound Healing, and Some Specific Dermatologic Disorders: A Narrative Review on Biological Mechanisms, Clinical Evidence, and Therapeutic Perspectives
- Body Weight, Body Composition, Nutrition, and Sex in Gastric Cancer: Epidemiological Associations and Surgical Outcomes—A Narrative Review
BibTeX
@article{shin2026nutrition,
title = {{Nutrition and Depression: A Narrative Review of Biological Mechanisms and Evidence from Observational Studies and Clinical Trials}},
author = {Sunhye Shin and Chan Yoon Park},
journal = {Nutrients},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/nu18213479},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/18/21/3479},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Nutrition and Depression: A Narrative Review of Biological Mechanisms and Evidence from Observational Studies and Clinical Trials
AU - Sunhye Shin
AU - Chan Yoon Park
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/23
JO - Nutrients
DO - 10.3390/nu18213479
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/18/21/3479
AB - Depression is one of the most prevalent and disabling psychiatric disorders worldwide and has a heterogeneous pathophysiology involving interacting neurobiological, neuroimmune, and metabolic processes. Alterations in neurotransmission, neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, gut–brain communication, hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis dysregulation, and immunometabolic homeostasis may provide biological links between nutrition and depression. This narrative review examines current evidence linking nutrition and depression across mechanistic, observational, and clinical levels. Regarding dietary patterns, observational evidence generally associates greater adherence to the Mediterranean diet with more favorable depression-related outcomes, while evidence for the DASH diet remains more limited. In contrast, Western dietary patterns and greater consumption of ultra-processed foods are associated with higher risks of depression-related outcomes. Individual nutrients, including omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, vitamin D, vitamin C, folate, vitamin B12, vitamin B6, and essential minerals, have also been investigated in relation to depression, but findings from supplementation studies vary across nutrients, study populations, and baseline nutritional status. However, much of the evidence linking nutritional factors with depression is observational and does not establish causality. Clinical trials of nutrient supplementation and dietary interventions have reported potential benefits in some populations, but findings remain heterogeneous, and large prevention trials have also reported null results. Differences in baseline nutritional status, depression phenotype, and metabolic and inflammatory profiles may partly contribute to this heterogeneity. Future well-designed clinical trials, together with advances in multi-omics and precision approaches, may help identify individuals most likely to benefit from targeted nutritional strategies.
SN - 2072-6643
ER -