Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 8 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Latent-Space No-Arbitrage Geometry of Generative Models for Implied Volatility Surfaces

Abstract

Generative models for implied volatility surfaces must produce outputs that satisfy static no-arbitrage constraints. We study these constraints in latent space. For a fixed generator, we assign each latent code a scalar margin determined by the no-arbitrage conditions of the generated surface. The codes with nonnegative margin form the admissible latent set. We establish conditions under which strictly admissible codes remain admissible under small perturbations and the boundary of the admissible set is characterized by zero margin. For regular boundary components, we formulate a level-set equation whose local dynamics are directed toward the zero-margin set. The analysis treats the generator as a map from latent variables to surfaces and is therefore not restricted to a particular architecture. It applies to variational autoencoders, generative adversarial networks, and other generative models with a deterministic realization map. Numerical tests recover known boundaries in analytic examples. Experiments with a variational autoencoder trained on Heston surfaces show that similar reconstruction errors can correspond to different admissible regions and that the latent prior may be concentrated inside such a region. The computed boundary can also be used to modify latent codes that generate violating surfaces.

Related

  1. Compiling and forecasting implied volatility surfaces via survey sampling, tempered inverse-probability sequence learning, and causal activity clocks
    Deepak Bastola, Eli Prushansky
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  2. A Geometry-Aware Residual Correction of Hagan's SABR Implied Volatility Formula
    Adil Reghai, Lama Tarsissi, Gérard Biau +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Yet another asymptotic formula for implied volatility
    Masaaki Fukasawa
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textProbabilityarXiv
  4. Basket implied volatility skew and stickiness
    Masaaki Fukasawa, Jun Maeda, Tatsuya Ogiwara
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textProbabilityarXiv
  5. Asymptotically-informed neural networks for Black-Scholes implied volatility computation
    Samira Amiriyan, Youness Boutaib
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{wang2026latentspace,
  title = {{Latent-Space No-Arbitrage Geometry of Generative Models for Implied Volatility Surfaces}},
  author = {Jing Wang and Shuaiqiang Liu and Cornelis Vuik},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.00332},
  eprint = {2609.00332},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00332},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Latent-Space No-Arbitrage Geometry of Generative Models for Implied Volatility Surfaces
AU  - Jing Wang
AU  - Shuaiqiang Liu
AU  - Cornelis Vuik
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/01
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.00332
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00332
AB  - Generative models for implied volatility surfaces must produce outputs that satisfy static no-arbitrage constraints. We study these constraints in latent space. For a fixed generator, we assign each latent code a scalar margin determined by the no-arbitrage conditions of the generated surface. The codes with nonnegative margin form the admissible latent set. We establish conditions under which strictly admissible codes remain admissible under small perturbations and the boundary of the admissible set is characterized by zero margin. For regular boundary components, we formulate a level-set equation whose local dynamics are directed toward the zero-margin set. The analysis treats the generator as a map from latent variables to surfaces and is therefore not restricted to a particular architecture. It applies to variational autoencoders, generative adversarial networks, and other generative models with a deterministic realization map. Numerical tests recover known boundaries in analytic examples. Experiments with a variational autoencoder trained on Heston surfaces show that similar reconstruction errors can correspond to different admissible regions and that the latent prior may be concentrated inside such a region. The computed boundary can also be used to modify latent codes that generate violating surfaces.
ER  -