Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 10 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

On the Gradient Heterogeneity Dynamics of Adversarially Robust Federated Regression

Abstract

Federated learning (FL) is intrinsically heterogeneous: honest clients may have different data-generating models. On top of that, adversarial clients can make heterogeneity even more pronounced by sharing arbitrary updates. Existing analyses typically control the interaction between statistical heterogeneity and adversarial behavior through gradient-dissimilarity conditions. However, the underlying bound is imposed a priori and may yield conservative guarantees even for least-squares regression. We instead derive the gradient heterogeneity from the statistical model of linear and nonlinear regression with fresh data samples at every round. Our bounds separate heterogeneity among the honest clients' ground-truth model parameters, finite-sample label noise, and initialization. We then demonstrate that, for any (f,κ)-robust aggregator with coefficient κ= O(f/n), where f is the number of adversarial clients and n the total number of clients (with f/n < 1/2), convergence holds after an explicit sample burn-in.

Related

  1. Statistical and Privacy Guarantees for Deep M-Regression via Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics
    Yeheng Ge, Jian Huang, Shuyuan Wu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Large Stepsizes Federated Learning on Logistic Regression with Linearly Separable Data: The Case of Heterogeneous Devices
    Hok Fong Wong, Hoi-To Wai, Chung-Yiu Yau
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  3. Hybrid Federated Learning for Multimodal Fusion under Missing Modalities and Site Heterogeneity
    Xiaofei Wu, Rongmei Liang, Jian Qing Shi
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Federated Time-to-Event Data Analysis Using Piecewise Exponential Regression in DataSHIELD.
    Bodil Svennblad, Benedicte Delcoigne, Paul Burton +1
    Statistics in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textStatisticsEurope PMC
  5. Federated Nonparametric Regression with Heterogeneous Clients
    Xiaoran Jiang, Anand N. Vidyashankar
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{toso2026gradient,
  title = {{On the Gradient Heterogeneity Dynamics of Adversarially Robust Federated Regression}},
  author = {Leonardo F. Toso and James Anderson and Nirupam Gupta and Rafael Pinot},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.25705},
  eprint = {2609.25705},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.25705},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - On the Gradient Heterogeneity Dynamics of Adversarially Robust Federated Regression
AU  - Leonardo F. Toso
AU  - James Anderson
AU  - Nirupam Gupta
AU  - Rafael Pinot
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/22
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.25705
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.25705
AB  - Federated learning (FL) is intrinsically heterogeneous: honest clients may have different data-generating models. On top of that, adversarial clients can make heterogeneity even more pronounced by sharing arbitrary updates. Existing analyses typically control the interaction between statistical heterogeneity and adversarial behavior through gradient-dissimilarity conditions. However, the underlying bound is imposed a priori and may yield conservative guarantees even for least-squares regression. We instead derive the gradient heterogeneity from the statistical model of linear and nonlinear regression with fresh data samples at every round. Our bounds separate heterogeneity among the honest clients' ground-truth model parameters, finite-sample label noise, and initialization. We then demonstrate that, for any (f,κ)-robust aggregator with coefficient κ= O(f/n), where f is the number of adversarial clients and n the total number of clients (with f/n < 1/2), convergence holds after an explicit sample burn-in.
ER  -