Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYPlant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.)

Cold Plasma‐Mediated Seed Priming: Plant Stress Responses and Potential Ecological Implications

  1. 1Department of Biology, College of Science Shiraz University Shiraz Iran

Abstract

Cold plasma (CP) is being investigated as a non‐thermal seed treatment because studies have reported effects on germination, early seedling growth, plant responses to stress, and seed‐borne microorganisms. These effects have been linked to the generation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS and RNS), changes in seed‐surface characteristics, and alterations in physiological and biochemical processes within the plant. However, the response to treatment is not always consistent. It depends on factors such as plant species, plasma source, exposure time, and treatment intensity, while excessive exposure may adversely affect seed performance. Research to date suggests that CP may help improve crop establishment and modify plant responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. However, whether these effects lead to broader ecological benefits remains unclear. Relatively little is known about how CP treatment affects plant–microbe interactions, soil microbial communities, plant community structure, or ecosystem functioning under field conditions. It is also uncertain whether treatment‐induced responses persist across generations or involve stress memory and epigenetic regulation. These possibilities require direct experimental evidence rather than inference from short‐term physiological responses. This review examines current findings on the effects of CP on seed germination, pathogen suppression, and plant responses to environmental stress. It considers the mechanisms proposed to explain these effects, the variation observed across experimental systems, and the extent to which existing evidence supports the conclusions drawn. Potential ecological implications and unresolved evolutionary questions are also discussed. An important limitation of the current literature is its reliance on laboratory and controlled‐environment experiments, alongside a shortage of long‐term field studies and multigenerational investigations. As a result, the wider ecological consequences of CP seed treatment cannot yet be established with confidence. Addressing this gap will require more consistent treatment protocols, validation under field conditions, and studies that examine whether physiological and molecular responses are accompanied by measurable changes in plant performance, biological interactions, and ecosystem processes. Such evidence will be essential for determining both the practical value of CP seed treatment and its longer‐term environmental implications.

Related

  1. Sodium–Glucose Cotransporter 2-Mediated Glucose Uptake Contributes to Glycogen Accumulation in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Implications for Clear Cell Morphology and Potential Therapeutic Relevance
    Yujiro Nagata, Ikko Tomisaki, Takuo Matsukawa +10
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossrefEurope PMC
  2. Radiation therapy synergizes with mRNA vaccination to overcome microglia-mediated suppression of dendritic cell migration and T cell priming in glioblastoma
    A. J. Wisdom, Z. J. Rogers, F. Chatterjee +19
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textOncologybioRxiv
  3. Priming of CD8+ T cells by peripheral dendritic cells exacerbates tau-mediated neurodegeneration
    Hao Hu, Peter Bor‐Chian Lin, Carisa Zeng +28
    Nature NeurosciencePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full text5 citedNeurosciencePhysiologyPMCOpenAlex
  4. β-Glucan–mediated macrophage priming enhances macrophage activation and host defense against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection
    Firoz Ahmad, Mohd Khubaib, Rolee Sharma
    Frontiers in MicrobiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textInfectious diseaseCrossrefEurope PMC
  5. Bacterial immune priming and Wolbachia-mediated dengue blocking in Aedes albopictus mosquitoes
    Abdullah A. Alomar, Dongmin Kim, Barry W. Alto +1
    PLOS Neglected Tropical DiseasesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMicrobiologyZoology & animal behaviourPLOSPMC
BibTeX
@article{karimi2026cold,
  title = {{Cold Plasma‐Mediated Seed Priming: Plant Stress Responses and Potential Ecological Implications}},
  author = {Javad Karimi and Saeideh Arbabi},
  journal = {Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.)},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1002/pei3.70228},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13722913},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Cold Plasma‐Mediated Seed Priming: Plant Stress Responses and Potential Ecological Implications
AU  - Javad Karimi
AU  - Saeideh Arbabi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
JO  - Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.)
DO  - 10.1002/pei3.70228
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13722913
AB  - Cold plasma (CP) is being investigated as a non‐thermal seed treatment because studies have reported effects on germination, early seedling growth, plant responses to stress, and seed‐borne microorganisms. These effects have been linked to the generation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS and RNS), changes in seed‐surface characteristics, and alterations in physiological and biochemical processes within the plant. However, the response to treatment is not always consistent. It depends on factors such as plant species, plasma source, exposure time, and treatment intensity, while excessive exposure may adversely affect seed performance. Research to date suggests that CP may help improve crop establishment and modify plant responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. However, whether these effects lead to broader ecological benefits remains unclear. Relatively little is known about how CP treatment affects plant–microbe interactions, soil microbial communities, plant community structure, or ecosystem functioning under field conditions. It is also uncertain whether treatment‐induced responses persist across generations or involve stress memory and epigenetic regulation. These possibilities require direct experimental evidence rather than inference from short‐term physiological responses. This review examines current findings on the effects of CP on seed germination, pathogen suppression, and plant responses to environmental stress. It considers the mechanisms proposed to explain these effects, the variation observed across experimental systems, and the extent to which existing evidence supports the conclusions drawn. Potential ecological implications and unresolved evolutionary questions are also discussed. An important limitation of the current literature is its reliance on laboratory and controlled‐environment experiments, alongside a shortage of long‐term field studies and multigenerational investigations. As a result, the wider ecological consequences of CP seed treatment cannot yet be established with confidence. Addressing this gap will require more consistent treatment protocols, validation under field conditions, and studies that examine whether physiological and molecular responses are accompanied by measurable changes in plant performance, biological interactions, and ecosystem processes. Such evidence will be essential for determining both the practical value of CP seed treatment and its longer‐term environmental implications.
SN  - 2575-6265
ER  -