Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
178,970 studies31 sourcesUpdated 22 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SASRM Journal of Research in Dental Sciences

Evaluating the efficacy of a single preemptive dose of ketorolac or paracetamol for managing orthodontic procedure pain in adolescents – A randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Background: Orthodontic pain is an expected consequence of orthodontic tooth movement and may affect patient compliance and quality of life. Preemptive analgesia has been proposed as a strategy to reduce procedure-related discomfort. Aim: The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a single preemptive oral dose of ketorolac or paracetamol in reducing pain associated with routine orthodontic archwire activation compared with placebo. Materials and Methods: This double-blind, crossover randomized controlled trial included 50 adolescents undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment. Participants received ketorolac (10 mg), paracetamol (500 mg), and placebo at three separate appointments in randomized order with a 1-month washout period. Pain was assessed using a Visual Analog Scale after activation at 0, 6, 24, and 48 h. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used for analysis. Results: Pain levels varied significantly over time (P < 0.001), peaking at 24 h. No significant difference was observed among ketorolac, paracetamol, and placebo groups (P > 0.05). The younger patients (14 and 15 years) experienced lower discomfort immediately after the procedure compared to older (16 and 17 years) age groups. Individuals with McLaughlin–Bennett–Trevisi (MBT) brackets experienced significantly more discomfort than those with self-ligating brackets. Conclusion: A single preemptive dose of ketorolac or paracetamol does not provide superior pain relief compared with placebo during orthodontic archwire activation. Hence, routine preemptive dosage of analgesia is not warranted.

Related

  1. Comparative evaluation of the antipyretic and analgesic efficacy and safety of a fast-release paracetamol 650 mg formulation vs. conventional paracetamol formulations in adults with acute febrile or febrile-pain conditions: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
    Susobhan Mondal, S. K. Ashik Ikbal, Sumit Agrawal +11
    Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. A Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of Three Different Mouthwashes on Salivary pH in Patients Undergoing Fixed Orthodontic Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Sruthi Jeevagan, Sathi Rami Reddy Mora, Mohamed Rahmankhan N +3
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Evaluating the implementation of the Diabetes Body Project in a clinical cohort of Australian adolescents with type 1 diabetes
    Emma L. Fisher, Kirrilly M. Pursey, Lucy Leigh +2
    Frontiers in endocrinologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEndocrinology & metabolismEurope PMC
  4. Evaluating a shared decision engagement system in the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program: a multi-level randomized controlled trial
    Sarah T Hawley, Kelley M Kidwell, Reshma Jagsi +10
    JNCI Cancer SpectrumPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textOncologyPMC
  5. Associations between behavioral intervention dose and outcomes in children and adolescents with obesity: meta-regression of randomized clinical trials
    Yakun Liu, Xiaoyan Shi, Tingwen Chen +4
    BMC MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
BibTeX
@article{joshi2026evaluating,
  title = {{Evaluating the efficacy of a single preemptive dose of ketorolac or paracetamol for managing orthodontic procedure pain in adolescents – A randomized controlled trial}},
  author = {Yatishkumar S. Joshi and Disha Limbraj Khandade and Suresh K. Kangane and Pravinkumar S. Maroore and Ganesh Dange and Arsalan Shaikh and Swathilekshmi Nair},
  journal = {SRM Journal of Research in Dental Sciences},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.4103/srmjrds.srmjrds_18_26},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.4103/srmjrds.srmjrds_18_26},
  note = {CC BY-NC-SA},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Evaluating the efficacy of a single preemptive dose of ketorolac or paracetamol for managing orthodontic procedure pain in adolescents – A randomized controlled trial
AU  - Yatishkumar S. Joshi
AU  - Disha Limbraj Khandade
AU  - Suresh K. Kangane
AU  - Pravinkumar S. Maroore
AU  - Ganesh Dange
AU  - Arsalan Shaikh
AU  - Swathilekshmi Nair
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - SRM Journal of Research in Dental Sciences
DO  - 10.4103/srmjrds.srmjrds_18_26
UR  - https://doi.org/10.4103/srmjrds.srmjrds_18_26
AB  - Background: Orthodontic pain is an expected consequence of orthodontic tooth movement and may affect patient compliance and quality of life. Preemptive analgesia has been proposed as a strategy to reduce procedure-related discomfort. Aim: The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a single preemptive oral dose of ketorolac or paracetamol in reducing pain associated with routine orthodontic archwire activation compared with placebo. Materials and Methods: This double-blind, crossover randomized controlled trial included 50 adolescents undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment. Participants received ketorolac (10 mg), paracetamol (500 mg), and placebo at three separate appointments in randomized order with a 1-month washout period. Pain was assessed using a Visual Analog Scale after activation at 0, 6, 24, and 48 h. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used for analysis. Results: Pain levels varied significantly over time (P < 0.001), peaking at 24 h. No significant difference was observed among ketorolac, paracetamol, and placebo groups (P > 0.05). The younger patients (14 and 15 years) experienced lower discomfort immediately after the procedure compared to older (16 and 17 years) age groups. Individuals with McLaughlin–Bennett–Trevisi (MBT) brackets experienced significantly more discomfort than those with self-ligating brackets. Conclusion: A single preemptive dose of ketorolac or paracetamol does not provide superior pain relief compared with placebo during orthodontic archwire activation. Hence, routine preemptive dosage of analgesia is not warranted.
SN  - 2772-5243
SN  - 2772-5251
ER  -