Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,335 studies31 sourcesUpdated 54 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0ACS Omega

Comparative Assessment of Group Contribution Models for Estimating the Isobaric Heat Capacity of Ionic Liquids

  1. 1Universidade Federal do Ceará , , Campus do Pici, Bloco 709 , , ,
  2. 2Universidade Federal de Lavras, Campus Universitário , , , ,
  3. 3Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido , , Campus Leste. , , ,

Abstract

Eight widely used group-contribution models were evaluated for their ability to estimate the isobaric heat capacity (Cp) of ionic liquids (ILs). A curated database containing 9037 experimental data points for 142 ILs, covering eight cation families, temperatures from 190 to 524.87 K, and heat capacities from 93.0 to 1805.7 J·mol–1·K–1, was assembled to assess model performance under diverse conditions. Three main evaluation criteria were applied: predictive accuracy, functional-group flexibility, and ability to represent structural diversity of cation–anion combinations. Among the evaluated models, “GAR”, “SOR”, and “MIA” exhibited the best predictive accuracy, with overall % AARD values of 5.10%, 4.30%, and 4.22%, respectively. The “MIA” model is particularly suitable for imidazolium- and pyridinium-based ILs, relevant in industrial contexts. The “SAT” model also proved promising for CAMD applications due to its flexible atomic-contribution framework. Overall, the study offers practical guidance for selecting group-contribution methods when experimental data are unavailable.

Related

  1. Assessment of CO₂ adsorption capacity in Wollastonite using atomistic simulation
    Hamidréza Ramézani, Jena Jeong, Suresh K Bhatia +1
    Journal of CO2 UtilizationPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textMaterials & polymersTheoretical & computational chemistryHAL
  2. Assessment of Antioxidant Capacity, Phytochemical Phenolic Composition, Cholinesterase and α-Glucosidase Inhibitory Activities, and Antimicrobial Potential of Tribulus terrestris
    Ashwell R. Ndhlala, Emrah Dikici, Sevgi Altın +3
    Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral chemistryEurope PMC
  3. Mechanistic assessment and control of poloxamer activity: exploiting bulk hydration to maximise solubilisation capacity
    Roderick Stewart, Manveer Sandhu, Sunil Shah +2
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOrganic chemistryCrossref
  4. Non-Isobaric Is Not Enough: Gap-Merge Safety for Unambiguous Peptide Readout
    Laalini Bhogadi
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textPhysical chemistryChemRxiv
  5. Isothermal-Isobaric Molecular Dynamics with a Foundation Interatomic Potential in LAMMPS across NVIDIA and Intel GPUs
    Xiaoli Yan, Eliu Huerta
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPhysical chemistryarXiv
BibTeX
@article{araujo2026comparative,
  title = {{Comparative Assessment of Group Contribution Models for Estimating the Isobaric Heat Capacity of Ionic Liquids}},
  author = {Peterson Y. G. de Medeiros Araújo and Nathan S. Evangelista and Frederico R. do Carmo and Filipe X. Feitosa and Hosiberto B. de Sant’Ana},
  journal = {ACS Omega},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1021/acsomega.6c06472},
  url = {https://pubs.acs.org/acsodf/article/11/42/65463/5449461/Comparative-Assessment-of-Group-Contribution},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparative Assessment of Group Contribution Models for Estimating the Isobaric Heat Capacity of Ionic Liquids
AU  - Peterson Y. G. de Medeiros Araújo
AU  - Nathan S. Evangelista
AU  - Frederico R. do Carmo
AU  - Filipe X. Feitosa
AU  - Hosiberto B. de Sant’Ana
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/13
JO  - ACS Omega
DO  - 10.1021/acsomega.6c06472
UR  - https://pubs.acs.org/acsodf/article/11/42/65463/5449461/Comparative-Assessment-of-Group-Contribution
AB  - Eight widely used group-contribution models were evaluated for their ability to estimate the isobaric heat capacity (Cp) of ionic liquids (ILs). A curated database containing 9037 experimental data points for 142 ILs, covering eight cation families, temperatures from 190 to 524.87 K, and heat capacities from 93.0 to 1805.7 J·mol–1·K–1, was assembled to assess model performance under diverse conditions. Three main evaluation criteria were applied: predictive accuracy, functional-group flexibility, and ability to represent structural diversity of cation–anion combinations. Among the evaluated models, “GAR”, “SOR”, and “MIA” exhibited the best predictive accuracy, with overall % AARD values of 5.10%, 4.30%, and 4.22%, respectively. The “MIA” model is particularly suitable for imidazolium- and pyridinium-based ILs, relevant in industrial contexts. The “SAT” model also proved promising for CAMD applications due to its flexible atomic-contribution framework. Overall, the study offers practical guidance for selecting group-contribution methods when experimental data are unavailable.
SN  - 2470-1343
ER  -