Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
178,970 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Orthogonal Projections and Assouad Dimension: Resolving Fraser's Questions

Abstract

We examine two questions on exceptional orthogonal projections for Assouad dimension. Let 1≤ k<d and 1≤ q<d. For a set F contained in a q-dimensional subspace W⊂Rd and containing a nonempty relatively open subset of W, we compute both the Hausdorff and packing dimensions of the exceptional k-planes as $k(d-k)-|q-k|-1$. In particular, a square in R3 has a one-dimensional set of exceptional plane projections. This disproves the bound k(d−1−k) in Question 17.8.1 of Fraser's book as stated, for every 2≤ k<d. The planar packing question, Question 17.8.2, is already answered affirmatively by Wu's countability theorem. Using that theorem, we also describe the distinction between planar sets of Assouad dimension at most $1$ and those of dimension greater than $1$ when they are embedded in higher-dimensional spaces. The computations use elementary Grassmannian geometry; we make no claim of a new planar projection theorem or of an optimal bound for arbitrary higher-dimensional sets.

Related

  1. Holomorphic motions, Assouad dimension and quasiconformal mappings
    Katheryn Menssen, Malik Younsi
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  2. On the Assouad dimension of Weierstrass function graphs
    Efstathios Konstantinos Chrontsios Garitsis
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsDynamical systemsarXiv
  3. The Assouad Dimension of Graphs: An Affirmative Answer to Fraser's Question
    Binyan Yu, Bilel Selmi, Jia Liu +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  4. A bounded Borel set in the plane none of whose orthogonal projections is Borel
    Dmitrii Krokhalev
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  5. A new convergence proof for an iterative scheme for elliptic Cauchy problems based on alternating orthogonal projections
    Abhijit Guchhait, Adrian Muntean, Martin Lind
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{selmi2026orthogonal,
  title = {{Orthogonal Projections and Assouad Dimension: Resolving Fraser's Questions}},
  author = {Bilel Selmi},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.23295},
  eprint = {2610.23295},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23295},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Orthogonal Projections and Assouad Dimension: Resolving Fraser's Questions
AU  - Bilel Selmi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/16
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.23295
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23295
AB  - We examine two questions on exceptional orthogonal projections for Assouad dimension. Let 1≤ k<d and 1≤ q<d. For a set F contained in a q-dimensional subspace W⊂R^d and containing a nonempty relatively open subset of W, we compute both the Hausdorff and packing dimensions of the exceptional k-planes as $k(d-k)-|q-k|-1$. In particular, a square in R^3 has a one-dimensional set of exceptional plane projections. This disproves the bound k(d−1−k) in Question 17.8.1 of Fraser's book as stated, for every 2≤ k<d. The planar packing question, Question 17.8.2, is already answered affirmatively by Wu's countability theorem. Using that theorem, we also describe the distinction between planar sets of Assouad dimension at most $1$ and those of dimension greater than $1$ when they are embedded in higher-dimensional spaces. The computations use elementary Grassmannian geometry; we make no claim of a new planar projection theorem or of an optimal bound for arbitrary higher-dimensional sets.
ER  -