Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 17 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0The European Journal of Public Health

Evaluation of Slovenian National Cancer Control Programme – Guiding the Way Forward

Abstract

Issue/problem: Slovenia is ending the third 5-year period of National Cancer Control Programme (NCCP). Evaluation is important for learning lessons and setting future goals.

Description of the problem: Basic three entities should be covered in evaluation, covering structural, process and outcome indicators to identify strengths and shortcomings. Slovenian NCCP 2022-2026 did not have clear set of indicators for monitoring at the beginning, but developed them during the operational period covering governance of NCCP and monitoring of all areas of actions to achieve the three strategic goals of the NCCP. Results of evaluation of the 5-years period will be presented.

Results: In the field of governance all structures were established with designation of responsible authority, coordination team and wide array of involved experts. Inefficient transfer of information, overburden of staff, and not sufficient involvement of other sectors were observed. Funding for the coordination activities was stable but no specific monitoring of funding for cancer services was in place. All NCCP structures were functioning throughout the period with slight limitations due to changes in leadership positions and insufficient administrative support to the experts. Some novel approaches to collaboration in the field of oncology care and research have started. Present and future staffing, infrastructure and technology/digitalization challenges have been identified. Collaboration with patients was divers and during the whole period of action. Monitoring and feedback mechanisms of all activities in the NCCP were in place. Overall cancer burden monitoring has been in place for decades in Slovenia, but new monitoring specific for quality of cancer care and patient reported outcomes has been established.

Lessons: Monitoring and evaluation of NCCP is crucial for assessing performance and identifying challenges for setting future goals.

Key messages: • Slovenia is ending the third 5-year period of National Cancer Control Programme (NCCP). Evaluation is important for learning lessons and setting future goals.

• Monitoring and evaluation of National Cancer Control Programme is crucial for assessing performance, identifying challenges and setting future goals. 5-years evaluation in Slovenia will be presented.

Related

  1. Mixed-methods evaluation of a rights-based intervention to reduce long-term segregation in mental health services: the HOPE(S) National Programme in England.
    Alina Haines-Delmont, Kathryn Fradley, Dineesha Georgeena Rajan +1
    BMJ openPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMCCrossref
  2. Embedding health equity in Austria’s new public health-oriented national cancer control programme
    F Trauner, W Seebacher, C Einwögerer +5
    The European Journal of Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textOncologyPMCEurope PMC
  3. Trends in Household Salt Iodization and Program Monitoring under the National Iodine Deficiency Disorders Control Programme in Birbhum, West Bengal, India: 2020-2022.
    Manoj Ghosh, Jayita Pal, Priya Debnath +7
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEndocrinology & metabolismEurope PMC
  4. Qualitative Evaluation of Ireland’s National Infant RSV Immunisation Programme
    K Brown, J Finucane, P O’L orcain +5
    The European Journal of Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPMCEurope PMC
  5. Evaluation of Iraq's national plan for hepatitis B control: identifying gaps and strategies for improvement.
    Mohammed A Jalal, Manoochehr Karami, Mahshid Namdari +3
    BMC public healthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull text1 citedEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{dvornik2026evaluation,
  title = {{Evaluation of Slovenian National Cancer Control Programme – Guiding the Way Forward}},
  author = {A Dvornik and S Tomšič and A Duratović Konjević and B Mihevc Ponikvar and J Žgajnar},
  journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1877},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1877},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Evaluation of Slovenian National Cancer Control Programme – Guiding the Way Forward
AU  - A Dvornik
AU  - S Tomšič
AU  - A Duratović Konjević
AU  - B Mihevc Ponikvar
AU  - J Žgajnar
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - The European Journal of Public Health
DO  - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1877
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1877
AB  - Issue/problem: Slovenia is ending the third 5-year period of National Cancer Control Programme (NCCP). Evaluation is important for learning lessons and setting future goals.  Description of the problem: Basic three entities should be covered in evaluation, covering structural, process and outcome indicators to identify strengths and shortcomings. Slovenian NCCP 2022-2026 did not have clear set of indicators for monitoring at the beginning, but developed them during the operational period covering governance of NCCP and monitoring of all areas of actions to achieve the three strategic goals of the NCCP. Results of evaluation of the 5-years period will be presented.  Results: In the field of governance all structures were established with designation of responsible authority, coordination team and wide array of involved experts. Inefficient transfer of information, overburden of staff, and not sufficient involvement of other sectors were observed. Funding for the coordination activities was stable but no specific monitoring of funding for cancer services was in place. All NCCP structures were functioning throughout the period with slight limitations due to changes in leadership positions and insufficient administrative support to the experts. Some novel approaches to collaboration in the field of oncology care and research have started. Present and future staffing, infrastructure and technology/digitalization challenges have been identified. Collaboration with patients was divers and during the whole period of action. Monitoring and feedback mechanisms of all activities in the NCCP were in place. Overall cancer burden monitoring has been in place for decades in Slovenia, but new monitoring specific for quality of cancer care and patient reported outcomes has been established.  Lessons: Monitoring and evaluation of NCCP is crucial for assessing performance and identifying challenges for setting future goals.  Key messages: • Slovenia is ending the third 5-year period of National Cancer Control Programme (NCCP). Evaluation is important for learning lessons and setting future goals.  • Monitoring and evaluation of National Cancer Control Programme is crucial for assessing performance, identifying challenges and setting future goals. 5-years evaluation in Slovenia will be presented.
SN  - 1101-1262
SN  - 1464-360X
ER  -