Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 41 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Npj Emerging Contaminants

More than meets the eye: artificial eyelashes as an unrecognized source of microplastics and heavy metals

  1. 1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Canada

Abstract

Despite growing concern over microplastic pollution, leave-on cosmetic products such as artificial eyelashes remain largely unexplored as sources of microplastics and associated contaminants. Here, nine artificial eyelash products were characterized for polymer composition, heavy metal content, and fiber release under simulated environmental conditions. Three polymers were identified: PBT (55.56%), PET (33.33%), and PVC (11.11%). Metal profiles varied widely across samples, with several metals of toxicological concern (Al, Ba, Co, Cr, Cu, Pb, Sb, Zn) detected but not declared on product labels. Sb concentrations in band-removed strip lash fibers reached 111.89 ± 6.55 µg/g, exceeding Health Canada’s cosmetic limit by >22×. Sediment-mediated mechanical abrasion generated substantial secondary microfiber release from cluster-style lashes, with increasing sand loading accelerating release kinetics. Up to ~50% of fibers were released within 24 h under medium–high abrasion, reaching 22,293 fibers/g at complete fiber release. A separate analysis of 19 top-selling online retail listings identified fiber counts of 1,800–20,000 fibers/pack, with sales-based extrapolation estimating annual emissions exceeding 2 billion microplastic fibers. Our findings identify artificial eyelashes as an overlooked source of primary and secondary microplastics and metal contaminants, underscoring the need for improved regulation and sustainable product design to reduce environmental and public health risks.

Related

  1. Source characterization and ecological risk of heavy metals in urban dust from two Iranian cities
    Farid Ebrahimzadeh, Hesam Ahmady-Birgani, Reza Dahmardeh Behrooz +2
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionCrossref
  2. Deep-sea tailing discharges as a legacy source of trace metals and metalloids in sediments from the Cassidaigne canyon (Mediterranean Sea)
    Stéphanie Jacquet, Duc Huy Dang, Véronique Lenoble +5
    Marine Pollution BulletinPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textGeneral chemistryEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  3. Source Identification and Apportionment of Heavy Metals in Tobacco Farmland Soils via Positive Matrix Factorization and Geochemical Indices
    Wei Xi, YuanYe Ping, Haiyang Cai +1
    Polish Journal of Environmental StudiesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull text15 citedEnvironmental science & pollutionOpenAlex
  4. Microbial Inoculant‐Driven Degradation of Microplastics Associated With Garbage Environment and Assessment of Degradation Product Toxicity
    G.P. Avinash, S. Karthick Raja Namasivayam
    Biotechnology and BioengineeringPeer-reviewedLicence not stated7 citedEnvironmental science & pollutionOpenAlex
  5. Bioflocculation of polystyrene microplastics using dried Nostoc spp. biomass: laboratory performance, response modeling, and mechanistic assessment
    Fatemeh Keykha Akhar, Mohaddeseh Zahmatkesh Anbarani, Maryam Ameri +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Hydrology & soilsCrossref
BibTeX
@article{kreutz2026more,
  title = {{More than meets the eye: artificial eyelashes as an unrecognized source of microplastics and heavy metals}},
  author = {Jessica Kreutz and Ridwan Alabi and Olubukola S. Alimi},
  journal = {Npj Emerging Contaminants},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1038/s44454-026-00072-y},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s44454-026-00072-y},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - More than meets the eye: artificial eyelashes as an unrecognized source of microplastics and heavy metals
AU  - Jessica Kreutz
AU  - Ridwan Alabi
AU  - Olubukola S. Alimi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/31
JO  - Npj Emerging Contaminants
DO  - 10.1038/s44454-026-00072-y
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1038/s44454-026-00072-y
AB  - Despite growing concern over microplastic pollution, leave-on cosmetic products such as artificial eyelashes remain largely unexplored as sources of microplastics and associated contaminants. Here, nine artificial eyelash products were characterized for polymer composition, heavy metal content, and fiber release under simulated environmental conditions. Three polymers were identified: PBT (55.56%), PET (33.33%), and PVC (11.11%). Metal profiles varied widely across samples, with several metals of toxicological concern (Al, Ba, Co, Cr, Cu, Pb, Sb, Zn) detected but not declared on product labels. Sb concentrations in band-removed strip lash fibers reached 111.89 ± 6.55 µg/g, exceeding Health Canada’s cosmetic limit by >22×. Sediment-mediated mechanical abrasion generated substantial secondary microfiber release from cluster-style lashes, with increasing sand loading accelerating release kinetics. Up to ~50% of fibers were released within 24 h under medium–high abrasion, reaching 22,293 fibers/g at complete fiber release. A separate analysis of 19 top-selling online retail listings identified fiber counts of 1,800–20,000 fibers/pack, with sales-based extrapolation estimating annual emissions exceeding 2 billion microplastic fibers. Our findings identify artificial eyelashes as an overlooked source of primary and secondary microplastics and metal contaminants, underscoring the need for improved regulation and sustainable product design to reduce environmental and public health risks.
SN  - 3059-3719
ER  -