Patient perception of dry eye disease and treatment: a multinational, cross-sectional, digital survey
9 affiliations
- 1Wzroq Eye Clinic, Warsaw, Poland
- 2Optegra Eye Health Care Clinic, Warsaw, Poland
- 3Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
- 4Earlam and Christopher, Taunton, UK
- 5King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- 6Bausch + Lomb, Bridgewater, New Jersey, US
- 7University Eye Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
- 8Hôpital Bicêtre APHP, Paris-Saclay University, Bicêtre, France
- 9Quinze-Vingts National Vision Hospital, Paris, France
Abstract
Aims: Despite the prevalence and burden of dry eye disease (DED), there are potential gaps in diagnosis, professional assessment and treatment engagement. To better understand individuals’ perspective of dry eye, a multinational survey was conducted to ask about symptoms, interactions with healthcare professionals (HCPs) and treatments.
Methods: Two cohorts were recruited to complete an online survey during 2025 in five countries (France, Germany, Poland, Saudi Arabia and the UK), one representing the general population and the other people with dry eye. No formal diagnosis of DED was required. Data were descriptive, and no inferential statistical analyses were conducted or formal between-country comparisons were made.
Results: Survey data were collected from 5152 participants (2580 from the general population and 2572 with dry eye) across the five countries. In the general population, 14–39% (lowest country response to highest country response) reported experiencing regular dry eye. HCP-diagnosed DED was reported by 13–25% of the general population and 39–61% of the population with dry eye. For participants who had visited an HCP about dry eye, most were not under active treatment by a doctor for dry eye (44–76%); ≥50% of initial discussions with HCPs about dry eye were during an appointment for a different reason. For those that had not consulted an HCP, the most frequent reason was that they did not consider their problem severe enough (32–49%).
Conclusions: The survey data indicated a gap between self-reported dry eye symptoms and self-reported HCP diagnosis and opportunities for improved awareness and knowledge among people with dry eye. Improvements in patient knowledge and better HCP understanding of patients’ needs could optimise outcomes and shift treatment to a personalised, patient-centric approach.
Related
- Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease and associated risk factors among medical students in the MENA region: a multinational cross-sectional study
- Multidimensional Clinical Deterioration in Interstitial Lung Disease: Longitudinal Concordance of Frailty, Patient-Reported Outcomes, and Lung Function in a Multinational European Registry Cohort Study
- Clinical History and Burden of Gaucher Disease Type 3: A Cross‐Sectional Multinational Study
- Association between latent profiles of disease risk perception and health-promoting behaviors among adult offspring of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study
- Shared Decision-Making and Decision Support in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review of Models, Treatment Pathways, and Patient-Centered Outcomes
BibTeX
@article{wozniak2026patient,
title = {{Patient perception of dry eye disease and treatment: a multinational, cross-sectional, digital survey}},
author = {Piotr A Wozniak and Elisabeth M Messmer and Sarah Farrant and Muhammad Ahad and Robert Ryan and Ertugrul Akbas and Stephanie C Joachim and Marc Labetoulle},
journal = {BMJ Open},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2026-121198},
url = {https://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-121198},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Patient perception of dry eye disease and treatment: a multinational, cross-sectional, digital survey
AU - Piotr A Wozniak
AU - Elisabeth M Messmer
AU - Sarah Farrant
AU - Muhammad Ahad
AU - Robert Ryan
AU - Ertugrul Akbas
AU - Stephanie C Joachim
AU - Marc Labetoulle
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/26
JO - BMJ Open
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2026-121198
UR - https://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-121198
AB - Aims: Despite the prevalence and burden of dry eye disease (DED), there are potential gaps in diagnosis, professional assessment and treatment engagement. To better understand individuals’ perspective of dry eye, a multinational survey was conducted to ask about symptoms, interactions with healthcare professionals (HCPs) and treatments. Methods: Two cohorts were recruited to complete an online survey during 2025 in five countries (France, Germany, Poland, Saudi Arabia and the UK), one representing the general population and the other people with dry eye. No formal diagnosis of DED was required. Data were descriptive, and no inferential statistical analyses were conducted or formal between-country comparisons were made. Results: Survey data were collected from 5152 participants (2580 from the general population and 2572 with dry eye) across the five countries. In the general population, 14–39% (lowest country response to highest country response) reported experiencing regular dry eye. HCP-diagnosed DED was reported by 13–25% of the general population and 39–61% of the population with dry eye. For participants who had visited an HCP about dry eye, most were not under active treatment by a doctor for dry eye (44–76%); ≥50% of initial discussions with HCPs about dry eye were during an appointment for a different reason. For those that had not consulted an HCP, the most frequent reason was that they did not consider their problem severe enough (32–49%). Conclusions: The survey data indicated a gap between self-reported dry eye symptoms and self-reported HCP diagnosis and opportunities for improved awareness and knowledge among people with dry eye. Improvements in patient knowledge and better HCP understanding of patients’ needs could optimise outcomes and shift treatment to a personalised, patient-centric approach.
SN - 2044-6055
SN - 2044-6055
ER -