Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 50 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0The Astronomical Journal

Enhancing the Interpretability of Radial Velocity Analysis Using Leave-one-out Cross Validation

  1. 1Arizona State University
  2. 2University of Chicago
  3. 3Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (IAA-CSIC)

Abstract

Radial velocity (RV) observations are reaching increasingly high precision, enabling the targeting of low-amplitude signals. Assessing results obtained at the limits of our capabilities requires understanding the relationship between data, models and inference. Leave-one-out cross validation (LOO-CV) has become an increasingly popular tool for interpretable model criticism in astronomical data analysis. In this work, we demonstrate how LOO-CV can provide insight into the RV analysis of exoplanetary systems through three case studies. We first investigate the anomalously high mass of HD 119130 b inferred from CARMENES RVs, later revised significantly downward after follow-up observations with other instruments. We show that this high mass was strongly driven by two individual measurements, whose removal significantly reduces the tension between data sets. Next, we use LOO-CV as a model selection tool for the GJ 4276 system. Here, LOO-CV prefers an eccentric single-planet model over a two-planet model, and identifies the orbital phases at which follow-up observations would best discriminate between them. Finally, we extend LOO-CV to models with correlated noise, applying it to the GJ 357 system, whose RVs are modeled with a Gaussian process. We find no predictive support for a fourth planetary signal that is moderately favored by the Bayesian evidence, strengthening the interpretation of a three-planet architecture previously reported in the literature. We provide practical guidance for implementing LOO-CV in RV analysis, together with an online tutorial. Such methods will become ever more important as future RV surveys push the limits of planet detection and characterization.

Related

  1. VELOcities of CEpheids (VELOCE) III. Reconstructing radial velocity curves of classical Cepheids
    Giordano Viviani, Richard I. Anderson
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsSolar & stellar physicsCrossref
  2. Radial velocity follow-up of astrometric substellar companions: 6 confirmed brown dwarfs and 13 impostor binaries Gaia
    Marcus L. Marcussen, Simon H. Albrecht, Kamil K. Kalinowski +7
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsSolar & stellar physicsCrossref
  3. Companions of hot Jupiters: Two decades of radial velocity monitoring with CORALIE
    Léna Parc, João P. Faria, François Bouchy +18
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsSolar & stellar physicsCrossref
  4. The GAPS programme at TNG. LXXIX. New mass constraints for the infant planets in the V1298,Tau system through a long-term radial-velocity monitoring with HARPS-N
    M. Damasso, P. Leonardi, L. Borsato +26
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsSolar & stellar physicsCrossref
  5. The Long-Term Radial Velocity Stability of the COS G130M/1291 Mode
    John Debes, David M. French, Leonardo A. Dos Santos +3
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textInstrumentation & methodsarXiv
BibTeX
@article{nixon2026enhancing,
  title = {{Enhancing the Interpretability of Radial Velocity Analysis Using Leave-one-out Cross Validation}},
  author = {Matthew C. Nixon and Ritvik Basant and Rafael Luque and Luis Welbanks and Pierrot Lamontagne},
  journal = {The Astronomical Journal},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3847/1538-3881/aeb013},
  url = {https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-3881/aeb013},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Enhancing the Interpretability of Radial Velocity Analysis Using Leave-one-out Cross Validation
AU  - Matthew C. Nixon
AU  - Ritvik Basant
AU  - Rafael Luque
AU  - Luis Welbanks
AU  - Pierrot Lamontagne
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/28
JO  - The Astronomical Journal
DO  - 10.3847/1538-3881/aeb013
UR  - https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-3881/aeb013
AB  - Radial velocity (RV) observations are reaching increasingly high precision, enabling the targeting of low-amplitude signals. Assessing results obtained at the limits of our capabilities requires understanding the relationship between data, models and inference. Leave-one-out cross validation (LOO-CV) has become an increasingly popular tool for interpretable model criticism in astronomical data analysis. In this work, we demonstrate how LOO-CV can provide insight into the RV analysis of exoplanetary systems through three case studies. We first investigate the anomalously high mass of HD 119130 b inferred from CARMENES RVs, later revised significantly downward after follow-up observations with other instruments. We show that this high mass was strongly driven by two individual measurements, whose removal significantly reduces the tension between data sets. Next, we use LOO-CV as a model selection tool for the GJ 4276 system. Here, LOO-CV prefers an eccentric single-planet model over a two-planet model, and identifies the orbital phases at which follow-up observations would best discriminate between them. Finally, we extend LOO-CV to models with correlated noise, applying it to the GJ 357 system, whose RVs are modeled with a Gaussian process. We find no predictive support for a fourth planetary signal that is moderately favored by the Bayesian evidence, strengthening the interpretation of a three-planet architecture previously reported in the literature. We provide practical guidance for implementing LOO-CV in RV analysis, together with an online tutorial. Such methods will become ever more important as future RV surveys push the limits of planet detection and characterization.
SN  - 0004-6256
SN  - 1538-3881
ER  -