Perceived Crises and Preparedness Gaps in Operating Room Nursing: A Qualitative Study of Training Priorities With Nurses and Educators
Abstract
Background: The operating room (OR) is a complex, high-stress environment in which crisis situations place considerable demands on staff and compromise patient care. Despite the availability of crisis management training, existing research has predominantly relied on objective measures of effectiveness rather than examining nurses' perceived preparedness to manage crises. Aim: This study aims to explore nurses' perceptions of crisis management in the OR, specifically what they perceive as a crisis situation, and which crises they consider important but feel insufficiently prepared to manage. Examining these dimensions allows for the identification of crisis situations representing priority areas for OR nurses' training. Methods: This exploratory qualitative study used focus group interviews with certified nurse anaesthetists, perioperative nurses, and nurse educators from anaesthesia and perioperative nursing programmes. Seven focus groups were analysed using qualitative content analysis, using an inductive approach with limited quantification. Results: Five categories of crisis situations were identified: (1) interpersonal dynamics; (2) staffing and equipment constraints; (3) errors or incidents during the care process; (4) unexpected external events; and (5) deterioration in the patient's condition. Participants reported feeling least prepared to manage interpersonal conflicts, emotional demands, and unexpected external events. Conclusion: This study identifies two critical training gaps. First, while nurses receive substantial training in procedural and technical crisis management, they perceive a significant lack of nontechnical skills training, particularly regarding interpersonal dynamics. Second, training related to low-frequency, high-impact crises appears insufficient.
Related
- Barriers in operating proactive source reduction informed by an early warning system for dengue prevention: A qualitative study from end-user perspectives in Vietnam
- Perceived facilitators and barriers influencing lifestyle modification among adults with cardiovascular disease attending a cardiac clinic at a referral hospital in northern Tanzania: An exploratory qualitative study
- Consequences of COVID-19 infection on educators’ executive functions: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
- A new era in optimization of anti-infective therapy: Current challenges and priorities
- Clinical trial landscape and translational priorities for adoptive T-cell and NK-cell therapies in gynecologic malignancies
BibTeX
@article{redjem2026perceived,
title = {{Perceived Crises and Preparedness Gaps in Operating Room Nursing: A Qualitative Study of Training Priorities With Nurses and Educators}},
author = {Inas D Redjem and Arnaud Huaulmé and Pierre Jannin and Estelle Michinov},
journal = {Journal of Nursing Management},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1155/jonm/5539605},
url = {https://hal.science/hal-05678209v1},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Perceived Crises and Preparedness Gaps in Operating Room Nursing: A Qualitative Study of Training Priorities With Nurses and Educators
AU - Inas D Redjem
AU - Arnaud Huaulmé
AU - Pierre Jannin
AU - Estelle Michinov
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/14
JO - Journal of Nursing Management
DO - 10.1155/jonm/5539605
UR - https://hal.science/hal-05678209v1
AB - Background: The operating room (OR) is a complex, high-stress environment in which crisis situations place considerable demands on staff and compromise patient care. Despite the availability of crisis management training, existing research has predominantly relied on objective measures of effectiveness rather than examining nurses' perceived preparedness to manage crises. Aim: This study aims to explore nurses' perceptions of crisis management in the OR, specifically what they perceive as a crisis situation, and which crises they consider important but feel insufficiently prepared to manage. Examining these dimensions allows for the identification of crisis situations representing priority areas for OR nurses' training. Methods: This exploratory qualitative study used focus group interviews with certified nurse anaesthetists, perioperative nurses, and nurse educators from anaesthesia and perioperative nursing programmes. Seven focus groups were analysed using qualitative content analysis, using an inductive approach with limited quantification. Results: Five categories of crisis situations were identified: (1) interpersonal dynamics; (2) staffing and equipment constraints; (3) errors or incidents during the care process; (4) unexpected external events; and (5) deterioration in the patient's condition. Participants reported feeling least prepared to manage interpersonal conflicts, emotional demands, and unexpected external events. Conclusion: This study identifies two critical training gaps. First, while nurses receive substantial training in procedural and technical crisis management, they perceive a significant lack of nontechnical skills training, particularly regarding interpersonal dynamics. Second, training related to low-frequency, high-impact crises appears insufficient.
SN - 0966-0429
SN - 1365-2834
ER -