Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,125 studies31 sourcesUpdated 22 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Public Health

Chronic disease count and fall-related characteristics among community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study of recurrent falls and fall timing

  1. 1Department of Health Management, Neijiang Health Vocational College, Neijiang, Sichuan, China
  2. 2Department of Orthopedics, Neijiang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Neijiang, Sichuan, China

Abstract

Background: Chronic conditions and falls commonly co-occur in older populations. This study described fall occurrence, recurrent falls, and participant-level fall timing across chronic disease count groups in a single-city community sample.

Methods: This cross-sectional survey included 610 community-dwelling adults aged ≥60 years in Neijiang, Sichuan, China. Self-reported falls during the preceding 12 months were classified by occurrence and frequency; recurrent falls were defined as ≥2 falls. One participant-level fall-timing category was analyzed per faller. Chronic disease count was an unweighted sum of seven disease domains. Crude and minimally adjusted logistic regression described count associations. Disease-specific crude associations, post-LASSO models, and an equal-duration morning-versus-afternoon comparison were exploratory analyses.

Results: Overall, 303 participants (49.7%) reported falls and 96 (15.7%) reported recurrent falls. Fall occurrence was non-monotonic across count groups (52.9%, 42.2%, 47.8%, 56.6%, and 68.6% for 0, 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 diseases); corresponding recurrent-fall proportions were 9.6%, 12.9%, 16.5%, 19.7%, and 37.3%. The minimally adjusted OR for recurrent falls in the ≥4 group versus 0 was 4.85 (95% CI 2.06–11.46). The five-category timing distribution did not show clear evidence of an overall difference (Pearson p = 0.195). The morning/non-morning contrast had p = 0.024, and the equal-duration comparison included 203 fallers (108 morning and 95 afternoon; p = 0.011). Disease-specific estimates varied across diseases and outcomes. Post-LASSO findings remained exploratory.

Conclusion: Fall-related characteristics differed across chronic disease count groups in this Neijiang sample, particularly with respect to recurrent falls. Timing differences depended on the comparison used. These cross-sectional findings are hypothesis-generating and do not establish temporal or causal relationships. Prospective, multicenter studies are required.

Related

  1. Current situation and influencing factors of oral frailty among community-dwelling older adults with chronic diseases in China: a cross-sectional study
    Yuan Zhou, Gui-Meng Wang, Ji-Sook Kang
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCCrossref
  2. Factors associated with health-promoting lifestyles among community-dwelling older adults in Zigong, China: a cross-sectional study
    Siyao Zeng, Vorapoj Promasatayaprot, Sumattana Glangkan +1
    Physical activity and nutritionPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Association between duration of smoking cessation and depressive symptoms among community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study
    Kanon Abe, Sho Nakakubo, Takehiko Doi +4
    Environmental Health and Preventive MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPhysiologyJ-STAGE
  4. Quality of life among community-dwelling older adults receiving primary care in the Podkarpackie region (Poland): a cross-sectional study
    Małgorzata Dziechciaż, Natalia Kuczek-Gaweł, Krzysztof Goniewicz +3
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossref
  5. The association between illness perception and family functioning with good death expectations in community-dwelling older adults with chronic diseases
    Yixuan Liang, Yingchun Wang
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
BibTeX
@article{chen2026chronic,
  title = {{Chronic disease count and fall-related characteristics among community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study of recurrent falls and fall timing}},
  author = {Yu Chen and Junliang Zhou and Yuanyuan Cai and Jierong Li},
  journal = {Frontiers in Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1882689},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1882689},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Chronic disease count and fall-related characteristics among community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study of recurrent falls and fall timing
AU  - Yu Chen
AU  - Junliang Zhou
AU  - Yuanyuan Cai
AU  - Jierong Li
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/12
JO  - Frontiers in Public Health
DO  - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1882689
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1882689
AB  - Background: Chronic conditions and falls commonly co-occur in older populations. This study described fall occurrence, recurrent falls, and participant-level fall timing across chronic disease count groups in a single-city community sample.  Methods: This cross-sectional survey included 610 community-dwelling adults aged ≥60 years in Neijiang, Sichuan, China. Self-reported falls during the preceding 12 months were classified by occurrence and frequency; recurrent falls were defined as ≥2 falls. One participant-level fall-timing category was analyzed per faller. Chronic disease count was an unweighted sum of seven disease domains. Crude and minimally adjusted logistic regression described count associations. Disease-specific crude associations, post-LASSO models, and an equal-duration morning-versus-afternoon comparison were exploratory analyses.  Results: Overall, 303 participants (49.7%) reported falls and 96 (15.7%) reported recurrent falls. Fall occurrence was non-monotonic across count groups (52.9%, 42.2%, 47.8%, 56.6%, and 68.6% for 0, 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 diseases); corresponding recurrent-fall proportions were 9.6%, 12.9%, 16.5%, 19.7%, and 37.3%. The minimally adjusted OR for recurrent falls in the ≥4 group versus 0 was 4.85 (95% CI 2.06–11.46). The five-category timing distribution did not show clear evidence of an overall difference (Pearson p = 0.195). The morning/non-morning contrast had p = 0.024, and the equal-duration comparison included 203 fallers (108 morning and 95 afternoon; p = 0.011). Disease-specific estimates varied across diseases and outcomes. Post-LASSO findings remained exploratory.  Conclusion: Fall-related characteristics differed across chronic disease count groups in this Neijiang sample, particularly with respect to recurrent falls. Timing differences depended on the comparison used. These cross-sectional findings are hypothesis-generating and do not establish temporal or causal relationships. Prospective, multicenter studies are required.
SN  - 2296-2565
ER  -