Artificial Intelligence, Ethics, Academic and Research Integrity in Higher Education: A Bibliometric Analysis
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) offers considerable benefits to higher education, yet its adoption raises persistent concerns about ethics and academic and research integrity. Few studies have mapped this intersection bibliometrically. This study, therefore, analysed 213 journal articles published between 2015 and 2025 and indexed in Scopus and Web of Science, with record selection reported in accordance with PRISMA 2020. VOSviewer was used to examine publication trends, leading sources, highly cited studies, productive countries, keyword co-occurrence and the temporal evolution of themes. Output was negligible before 2023 and grew sharply thereafter. The United States, China and the United Kingdom led production, whereas African contributions remained limited. Of the 845 harmonised keywords, 20 met a minimum occurrence threshold of six (6) and formed four (4) interconnected clusters: AI research ethics and privacy; responsible generative AI and literacy; AI and academic integrity; and AI-enabled teaching and educational technology. Recent scholarship has shifted towards generative AI, AI literacy and educational technology, while research integrity remains under-examined relative to academic integrity. The findings underscore the need for institutional AI governance frameworks, AI-literacy development, and more empirical and African-led research.
Related
- Questionable mediated effect of artificial intelligence anxiety on academic burnout: A comment on Long et al. (2026)
- Mapping Artificial Intelligence for Personalised Learning based on Learning Style: Scopus-Based Bibliometric Analysis (2006-2026)
- Transparency, accountability, and scholarly integrity: A systematic narrative review of artificial intelligence governance frameworks in healthcare publication
- Causal Inference with Generative Artificial Intelligence: Application to Texts as Treatments
- The Akaike Information Criterion and Artificial Intelligence
BibTeX
@article{oguntona2026artificial,
title = {{Artificial Intelligence, Ethics, Academic and Research Integrity in Higher Education: A Bibliometric Analysis}},
author = {Olusegun Aanuoluwapo Oguntona and Chijioke Emmanuel Emere},
journal = {Journal of Information Systems and Informatics},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.63158/journalisi.v8i5.1763},
url = {https://doi.org/10.63158/journalisi.v8i5.1763},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Artificial Intelligence, Ethics, Academic and Research Integrity in Higher Education: A Bibliometric Analysis
AU - Olusegun Aanuoluwapo Oguntona
AU - Chijioke Emmanuel Emere
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/24
JO - Journal of Information Systems and Informatics
DO - 10.63158/journalisi.v8i5.1763
UR - https://doi.org/10.63158/journalisi.v8i5.1763
AB - Artificial intelligence (AI) offers considerable benefits to higher education, yet its adoption raises persistent concerns about ethics and academic and research integrity. Few studies have mapped this intersection bibliometrically. This study, therefore, analysed 213 journal articles published between 2015 and 2025 and indexed in Scopus and Web of Science, with record selection reported in accordance with PRISMA 2020. VOSviewer was used to examine publication trends, leading sources, highly cited studies, productive countries, keyword co-occurrence and the temporal evolution of themes. Output was negligible before 2023 and grew sharply thereafter. The United States, China and the United Kingdom led production, whereas African contributions remained limited. Of the 845 harmonised keywords, 20 met a minimum occurrence threshold of six (6) and formed four (4) interconnected clusters: AI research ethics and privacy; responsible generative AI and literacy; AI and academic integrity; and AI-enabled teaching and educational technology. Recent scholarship has shifted towards generative AI, AI literacy and educational technology, while research integrity remains under-examined relative to academic integrity. The findings underscore the need for institutional AI governance frameworks, AI-literacy development, and more empirical and African-led research.
SN - 2656-5935
SN - 2656-4882
ER -