Energy-fed commitment: a minimal model of random selection followed by reinforcement
Abstract
When a symmetric instability is crossed, fluctuations choose one of several equivalent branches. We study a minimal stochastic model of what can then make that choice progressively harder to undo. After selection, the stiffness of the selected state grows in proportion to the energy released each time the structure recovers from a perturbation; in this conservative model that energy equals, up to small and explicitly computed terms, the work absorbed from the perturbing agent. The model is a phenomenological closure with one coupling constant. That energy reinforces a branch already chosen, rather than choosing it, is an assumption of the model, which we state and do not derive. Its consequences are quantitative. The growth of commitment depends on how the structure is driven: geometric under displacement control, linear under energy control and sublinear under force control, so that committed states absorb more work per cycle under displacement control and less under force control. Reinforcement suppresses reversal exponentially; beyond a finite commitment the alternative minimum disappears and reversals become rare crossings of an irreversibility threshold. With unbounded reinforcement a choice is retained forever with positive probability under stated conditions; with saturating reinforcement retention is finite, with a lifetime that grows exponentially with the saturation level. Exact first-passage calculations agree with stochastic simulations; these verify the closure and its analysis but cannot test the physical postulate. We identify the experiments that could: protocols that separate absorbed energy from the number of perturbations, and driven steady states with nonzero housekeeping heat, in which heat and absorbed work differ.
Related
- A Minimal Theoretical Model for Morphodynamic Selection in Soft Matter Systems
- Observational selection effects on radio pulsars are minimal for masses, but significant for orbits and spins
- Reinforcement Learning in High-Energy Physics: A Survey from Accelerator Control to Theory Exploration
- A Comprehensive Interpretation of the LZ High-Energy Recoil Event: A Minimal U(1)B Dark Sector and Its Experimental Tests
- Cosmological vacuum selection in dynamical symmetry breaking at zero vacuum energy
BibTeX
@misc{abbas2026energyfed,
title = {{Energy-fed commitment: a minimal model of random selection followed by reinforcement}},
author = {Haidar Issa Abbas},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.29670},
eprint = {2610.29670},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29670},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Energy-fed commitment: a minimal model of random selection followed by reinforcement
AU - Haidar Issa Abbas
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/21
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.29670
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29670
AB - When a symmetric instability is crossed, fluctuations choose one of several equivalent branches. We study a minimal stochastic model of what can then make that choice progressively harder to undo. After selection, the stiffness of the selected state grows in proportion to the energy released each time the structure recovers from a perturbation; in this conservative model that energy equals, up to small and explicitly computed terms, the work absorbed from the perturbing agent. The model is a phenomenological closure with one coupling constant. That energy reinforces a branch already chosen, rather than choosing it, is an assumption of the model, which we state and do not derive. Its consequences are quantitative. The growth of commitment depends on how the structure is driven: geometric under displacement control, linear under energy control and sublinear under force control, so that committed states absorb more work per cycle under displacement control and less under force control. Reinforcement suppresses reversal exponentially; beyond a finite commitment the alternative minimum disappears and reversals become rare crossings of an irreversibility threshold. With unbounded reinforcement a choice is retained forever with positive probability under stated conditions; with saturating reinforcement retention is finite, with a lifetime that grows exponentially with the saturation level. Exact first-passage calculations agree with stochastic simulations; these verify the closure and its analysis but cannot test the physical postulate. We identify the experiments that could: protocols that separate absorbed energy from the number of perturbations, and driven steady states with nonzero housekeeping heat, in which heat and absorbed work differ.
ER -