Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 12 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0arXiv

Controlling writhe in stellarator optimization

  • Tobias M. Schuett
  • Sophia A. Henneberg
Open at sourcePDFDOICite

Abstract

The writhe of a closed curve measures its coiling, and for a ribbon along it, writhe is the contribution to the linking number not due to twist. In stellarators, large writhe implies large helical excursion and has previously been either an uncontrolled outcome in optimization, or fixed beforehand by the choice of the coordinate system. We present a simple method to target the underlying writhe of the plasma boundary during optimization. Our method calculates writhe and linking number directly from the underlying elliptical boundary of the stellarator. It therefore does not require any properties of the MHD equilibrium solve, such as the true magnetic axis, making it fast to evaluate and smooth to differentiate. Examples for quasi-helically symmetric stellarators show that this target works well in practice.

Related

  1. An In-depth Study of Stochastic Stellarator Coil Optimization
    Vincenzo Gallegos, Evan Laljit, Julianne Stratton +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textPlasma physicsarXiv
  2. AI-Accelerated Gyrokinetic Predictions of Turbulent Transport for Stellarator Design Optimization and Experimental Planning
    R. Michael Churchill, Matt Landreman, Jong Youl Choi +10
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textPlasma physicsarXiv
  3. Towards Stellarator Geometry Optimisation for Nuclear Fusion
    Tobias Weißberg, Moritz Heep, Zorah Lähner +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPlasma physicsarXiv
  4. A New Degree of Freedom in Stellarator Coil Design
    Sophia A. Henneberg, Annika Zettl
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPlasma physicsarXiv
  5. Analytic non-axisymmetric 3D MHD equilibria without stellarator symmetry
    Opal Issan, Jonathan Citrin, Matt Landreman +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full text1 citedPlasma physicsarXiv

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@misc{schuett2026controlling,
  title = {{Controlling writhe in stellarator optimization}},
  author = {Tobias M. Schuett and Sophia A. Henneberg},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.18190},
  eprint = {2610.18190},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.18190},
  note = {CC BY-NC-SA 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Controlling writhe in stellarator optimization
AU  - Tobias M. Schuett
AU  - Sophia A. Henneberg
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/13
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.18190
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.18190
AB  - The writhe of a closed curve measures its coiling, and for a ribbon along it, writhe is the contribution to the linking number not due to twist. In stellarators, large writhe implies large helical excursion and has previously been either an uncontrolled outcome in optimization, or fixed beforehand by the choice of the coordinate system. We present a simple method to target the underlying writhe of the plasma boundary during optimization. Our method calculates writhe and linking number directly from the underlying elliptical boundary of the stellarator. It therefore does not require any properties of the MHD equilibrium solve, such as the true magnetic axis, making it fast to evaluate and smooth to differentiate. Examples for quasi-helically symmetric stellarators show that this target works well in practice.
ER  -