Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,230 studies31 sourcesUpdated 49 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Certified Adaptive List Decoding for Error-Correcting Codes

Abstract

Maximum-likelihood (ML) decoding of linear block codes is NP-hard, so neural decoders are evaluated by how closely they approach it. We observe that proving a candidate optimal can be far easier than finding it, and build a decoder that does both. We cast decoding as a search over an absorbing-state discrete diffusion model, whose sequential commitment of coordinates turns generation into a tree, and run a probability beam search over it. A dual bound from a linear-programming relaxation and a distance-based test, both derived from the code, then certify per frame that the current candidate is the global ML solution; because both are theorems, certified frames incur no accuracy-computation trade-off. Across $15$ codes and five operating points we certify up to 99.9% of frames, the two tests dividing the space as their derivations predict, one strong for sparse parity-check matrices and the other for codes with a large minimum distance. Certification also behaves as a per-frame reliability signal, with $96.7−100\%$ of all frame errors falling on uncertified frames. Against an exact ML reference at $5$ dB the decoder is within one standard deviation on three of the four codes where the reference is uncensored, and against four neural baselines it attains the best bit-error rate in $71$ of $75$ cells.

Related

  1. RPA Decoding with Few Subspace Projections for Correcting Structured Error Patterns in RM Codes
    Shiv Pratap Singh Rathore, Navin Kashyap
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  2. Four New Single-Error-Correcting Binary Codes
    Moshe Milshtein
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  3. Error-Correcting Weakly Constrained Codes: Constructions and Achievable Rates
    Prachi Mishra, Sidharth Jaggi, Navin Kashyap +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  4. The Exact Second Generalized Covering Radius of Binary Primitive Triple-Error-Correcting BCH Codes
    Isaac Barouch Essayag, Aryeh Lev Zabokritskiy
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  5. Random Non-Commutative Error-Correcting Codes
    Michael Best, Alexander Lubotzky
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{hwang2026certified,
  title = {{Certified Adaptive List Decoding for Error-Correcting Codes}},
  author = {Jaeho Hwang and Byung-Sun Won and Uiwon Hwang},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.27805},
  eprint = {2610.27805},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27805},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Certified Adaptive List Decoding for Error-Correcting Codes
AU  - Jaeho Hwang
AU  - Byung-Sun Won
AU  - Uiwon Hwang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/20
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.27805
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27805
AB  - Maximum-likelihood (ML) decoding of linear block codes is NP-hard, so neural decoders are evaluated by how closely they approach it. We observe that proving a candidate optimal can be far easier than finding it, and build a decoder that does both. We cast decoding as a search over an absorbing-state discrete diffusion model, whose sequential commitment of coordinates turns generation into a tree, and run a probability beam search over it. A dual bound from a linear-programming relaxation and a distance-based test, both derived from the code, then certify per frame that the current candidate is the global ML solution; because both are theorems, certified frames incur no accuracy-computation trade-off. Across $15$ codes and five operating points we certify up to 99.9% of frames, the two tests dividing the space as their derivations predict, one strong for sparse parity-check matrices and the other for codes with a large minimum distance. Certification also behaves as a per-frame reliability signal, with $96.7−100\%$ of all frame errors falling on uncertified frames. Against an exact ML reference at $5$ dB the decoder is within one standard deviation on three of the four codes where the reference is uncensored, and against four neural baselines it attains the best bit-error rate in $71$ of $75$ cells.
ER  -