Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
184,584 studies31 sourcesUpdated 37 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Public Health

My daughter knows over 21 people that have died from drug overdose or suicide: cross-sector rural provider perspectives on adverse childhood experiences

  1. 1Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Missouri

Abstract

Background: Cumulative exposure to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) is associated with an increased risk of substance use, overdose, and suicide. Rural children are more likely to experience most ACEs. There is limited literature contextualizing rural individuals’ experiences with ACEs. Public Health 3.0 calls for multisector partner engagement to generate collective impact. The purpose of this study was to evaluate rural providers’ perspectives on challenges and recommendations for ACEs mitigation in their community from a cross-sector context.

Participants and setting: Participants were 74 providers enrolled in an online ACEs training. Participants lived and/or worked in five rural Missouri counties with high drug overdose death rates.

Methods: This was a conventional content analysis of written responses to structured discussion prompts from three training modules. Analysis included familiarization, inductive identification of major codes, and refinement of codes, followed by independent coding by two authors until consensus, and reporting major patterns. Artificial intelligence supported preliminary code development. An adapted Sequential Intercept Model (SIM) framework organized challenges and recommendations by setting.

Results: Results included personal stories about how ACEs impacted their communities through overdose, suicide, homelessness, unemployment, and adverse health effects. Settings included schools, government, healthcare, daycares, criminal justice, Extension, fire departments, libraries, and nonprofits. Participants recommended expanding the ACEs definition to include satanic abuse, bullying, incest, war, genocide, military family stressors, and death of a loved one. Intervention recommendations included whole-family interventions, community-wide training, trauma-informed training, expanded access to treatment, classes in prison/jails, and fostering positive childhood experiences.

Conclusion: Community voice is necessary to contextualize setting-specific insights that inform development of upstream interventions appropriate for and tailored to the community. Participants identified both strategies that could be incorporated into everyday practice—including empathy, listening, providing judgment-free and safe spaces, providing food for children experiencing hunger, encouraging positive childhood experiences, mentoring, and connecting individuals with resources for food, shelter, clothing, and mental health—and broader structural changes that may require policy-level action. The adapted SIM organizes these concepts.

Related

  1. Barriers to Effective Type 2 Diabetes Care in a Conflict-Affected Region of Syria: A Qualitative Study of Health Care Provider Perspectives
    Bashar Shehab, Attila Sárváry
    Diabetes, Obesity, and Cardiometabolic CAREPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textEndocrinology & metabolismPMC
  2. A decade of implementing comprehensive child development services in Northwest Iran: a qualitative study of provider perspectives on barriers and facilitators
    Mehrdad Amir-Behghadami, Jafar Sadegh Tabrizi, Seifollah Heidarabadi
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  3. Knowledge and experiences of overdose among formerly incarcerated people living with HIV and hazardous opioid use in South Africa: A qualitative study
    Urvisha Bhoora, Yangxi An, Sarah Pollock +6
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMicrobiologyEpidemiology & public healthPLOSEurope PMCPMC
  4. A qualitative study of care management challenges in patients with multiple sclerosis from patient, family caregiver and healthcare provider perspectives
    Somayeh Azimpour, Nasrollah Alimohammadi, Fatemeh Nazari +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossref
  5. A qualitative evaluation of provider decision-making and patient experiences with 1-step and 2-step gestational diabetes (GDM) screening
    Srija Gogineni, Stephanie Sirna, Shreya Chitnavis +7
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Obstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsCrossref
BibTeX
@article{douglas2026daughter,
  title = {{My daughter knows over 21 people that have died from drug overdose or suicide: cross-sector rural provider perspectives on adverse childhood experiences}},
  author = {Ashley E. Douglas and Julie M. Kapp},
  journal = {Frontiers in Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1891916},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1891916/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - My daughter knows over 21 people that have died from drug overdose or suicide: cross-sector rural provider perspectives on adverse childhood experiences
AU  - Ashley E. Douglas
AU  - Julie M. Kapp
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/28
JO  - Frontiers in Public Health
DO  - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1891916
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1891916/full
AB  - Background: Cumulative exposure to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) is associated with an increased risk of substance use, overdose, and suicide. Rural children are more likely to experience most ACEs. There is limited literature contextualizing rural individuals’ experiences with ACEs. Public Health 3.0 calls for multisector partner engagement to generate collective impact. The purpose of this study was to evaluate rural providers’ perspectives on challenges and recommendations for ACEs mitigation in their community from a cross-sector context.  Participants and setting: Participants were 74 providers enrolled in an online ACEs training. Participants lived and/or worked in five rural Missouri counties with high drug overdose death rates.  Methods: This was a conventional content analysis of written responses to structured discussion prompts from three training modules. Analysis included familiarization, inductive identification of major codes, and refinement of codes, followed by independent coding by two authors until consensus, and reporting major patterns. Artificial intelligence supported preliminary code development. An adapted Sequential Intercept Model (SIM) framework organized challenges and recommendations by setting.  Results: Results included personal stories about how ACEs impacted their communities through overdose, suicide, homelessness, unemployment, and adverse health effects. Settings included schools, government, healthcare, daycares, criminal justice, Extension, fire departments, libraries, and nonprofits. Participants recommended expanding the ACEs definition to include satanic abuse, bullying, incest, war, genocide, military family stressors, and death of a loved one. Intervention recommendations included whole-family interventions, community-wide training, trauma-informed training, expanded access to treatment, classes in prison/jails, and fostering positive childhood experiences.  Conclusion: Community voice is necessary to contextualize setting-specific insights that inform development of upstream interventions appropriate for and tailored to the community. Participants identified both strategies that could be incorporated into everyday practice—including empathy, listening, providing judgment-free and safe spaces, providing food for children experiencing hunger, encouraging positive childhood experiences, mentoring, and connecting individuals with resources for food, shelter, clothing, and mental health—and broader structural changes that may require policy-level action. The adapted SIM organizes these concepts.
SN  - 2296-2565
ER  -