Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 6 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Approximate Universal Prediction under Interaction

Abstract

Bayesian mixtures, and Solomonoff induction in particular, provide an idealized model of prediction learned by minimizing population log loss, and they underlie universal agents such as AIXI. An agent that plans with an approximation of such a predictor decides where that predictor is evaluated, and a planner can be drawn toward branches on which its model is optimistic. We study which approximation guarantees survive this feedback. For normalized finite-horizon causal mixtures, the transfer coefficient factors into a policy likelihood ratio and task evidence available before each prediction, so task rarity and action-branch rarity can compound. Within one fixed universal mixture, infinitely many computable environments admit excess prediction error of order κη 2K(μ), where η is the training KL budget and κ measures policy coverage. This order is sharp, and for each target a computable predictor attains it at a suitable finite horizon, so computability alone does not remove the penalty. For bounded returns, value error is controlled by the probability of entering a poorly covered branch plus a square-root term in η. Both terms are necessary, and finite maximum coverage ratios are not required. Motivated by the mentor override of Golden Handcuffs, we derive margins for preserving deferral decisions and conditional KL budgets with an unavoidable inverse-history-probability penalty, and a counterexample separates agreement of deferral decisions from task-wise event avoidance. The guarantees apply to any predictor architecture that meets explicit population approximation and coverage conditions, which gives concrete targets for implementing idealized universal agents.

Related

  1. Universal recovery in approximate quantum error correction
    Dor Elimelech, Victor V. Albert, Alexander Barg
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. Approximate Solomonoff Induction: On the Robustness of Learned Universal Predictors
    Qian Li, Shang-Hua Teng
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Planar universal optimality, tiered: kernel-checked consequences, a non-uniqueness theorem, and a CVODE N-body consistency check for the Yukawa interaction
    Xavier Callens
    Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)PreprintCC BY8 citedNumerical analysis & scientific computingOpenAlex
  4. The Rytova-Keldysh interaction is a positive Gaussian mixture: kernel-checked admissibility for planar universal optimality and Keldysh-jellium Madelung energies of TMD Wigner lattices
    Xavier Callens
    Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)PreprintCC BY9 citedNumerical analysis & scientific computingOpenAlex
  5. Batch Universal Prediction via Conditional Additive Smoothing
    Marco Bondaschi, Michael Gastpar
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{suwandi2026approximate,
  title = {{Approximate Universal Prediction under Interaction}},
  author = {Richard Cornelius Suwandi},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.33842},
  eprint = {2610.33842},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33842},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Approximate Universal Prediction under Interaction
AU  - Richard Cornelius Suwandi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/24
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.33842
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33842
AB  - Bayesian mixtures, and Solomonoff induction in particular, provide an idealized model of prediction learned by minimizing population log loss, and they underlie universal agents such as AIXI. An agent that plans with an approximation of such a predictor decides where that predictor is evaluated, and a planner can be drawn toward branches on which its model is optimistic. We study which approximation guarantees survive this feedback. For normalized finite-horizon causal mixtures, the transfer coefficient factors into a policy likelihood ratio and task evidence available before each prediction, so task rarity and action-branch rarity can compound. Within one fixed universal mixture, infinitely many computable environments admit excess prediction error of order κη 2^K(μ), where η is the training KL budget and κ measures policy coverage. This order is sharp, and for each target a computable predictor attains it at a suitable finite horizon, so computability alone does not remove the penalty. For bounded returns, value error is controlled by the probability of entering a poorly covered branch plus a square-root term in η. Both terms are necessary, and finite maximum coverage ratios are not required. Motivated by the mentor override of Golden Handcuffs, we derive margins for preserving deferral decisions and conditional KL budgets with an unavoidable inverse-history-probability penalty, and a counterexample separates agreement of deferral decisions from task-wise event avoidance. The guarantees apply to any predictor architecture that meets explicit population approximation and coverage conditions, which gives concrete targets for implementing idealized universal agents.
ER  -